supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,843
I think thats a bit unfair to the SA pack replacements.
The scrum has two purposes:
either to get secure ball, getting quick ball while half the players are in one place giving space elsewhere, etc
or to force the opponent scrum into conceding a penalty - this can be either to deliberately stymie the first point or just because they're overpowered.
SA bring four scrummaging props - England's replacements couldn't acclimatise to their opposition. England going back to the old men of Marler and Cole probably says a lot about their replacements; I've not really thought that Sinckler could take on the best props.
Behind the front row, Chessum is a big lump but rarely seems to have a notable effect, and Vunipola hasn't looked like an elite player for some years (and allowing for the long injury).
I also don't think that taking Mitchell off for Care at scrumhalf helped. Unless it was injury, why take the 9 off with half an hour to go?
I think they have to stop giving so many scrum penalties. They are often incredibly difficult to call and we don't want a game dominated by scrum penalties, we want attractive attacking rugby which South Africa are capable of playing. England made them turn to the set piece, but errors started to creep in late on.