Russian invasion of Ukraine

[jaseirai]

What are the sanctions on these entities do we know could be the 18 the UK have applied can be hitting harder than the 490 the EU have applied doe's anyone have any insight.

He’s no idea and fails to mention EU country’s purchases of Russian oil and gas is directly funding the war. That’s what matters not houses in Belgravia or yachts in Bermuda.

 

[Phil1]

He’s no idea and fails to mention EU country’s purchases of Russian oil and gas is directly funding the war. That’s what matters not houses in Belgravia or yachts in Bermuda.

You Tories do like to stick together.

 

[JASR]

You Tories do like to stick together.

Oligarchwashing

 

[hello]

May be significant, may not...

Probably to collect the twats that got thrown out of the UN for being kgb.

 

[urban genie]

Just to clarify, your post was only moderated because it’s against the forum rules to copy & paste entire articles for copyright reasons. I even sought out the source of the article and added a link to your post, rather than just deleting it. I’d hardly class that as censorship tbf.

Think he is more about the pile on that followed instead of healthy debate on the perspective given in the article.

 

[wolviedinho]

Remind us, what were those good points?

I am not trolling through his posts to make a point. All I am saying is opposing viewpoints adds to the overall discussion. The topic is quite contentious at the moment and emotions high.

I have enjoyed the debate whether he is right or wrong.

 

[domalino]

I am not trolling through his posts to make a point. All I am saying is opposing viewpoints adds to the overall discussion. The topic is quite contentious at the moment and emotions high.

I have enjoyed the debate whether he is right or wrong.

So you said he made good points without actually knowing what they were or being able to recall any of them?

The reason So many asked what the good points were is because he didn’t make any good points, he just regurgitated Kremlin nonsense that’s long since been disproved.

There are loads of topics under the umbrella of this war and what it means that do have good points on both sides and there is no easy answer, but rascals got near unanimous rejection not because only one opinion is allowed but because his was so bad.

 

[KS55]

Obviously you weren't around in Britain in the late 40s.

Well I was actually. That gov achieved much on the social front, but economically zilch.
Your reply is not a serious answer.

 

[jaseirai]

I agree Abramovich's assets should be seized here, what else are Europe doing that we aren't apart from continuing to buy Russias oil and gas to fund Putins war. I don't really get the correlation between sanctions the UK are applying and refugee access TBH.

The Germans are supplying useless missiles from the Cold War. As generous as always.

Anti-aircraft missiles Germany offered Ukraine don't work

Soviet-era missiles were declared obsolete in 2014 and have become corroded in storage

www.telegraph.co.uk

"A classified military document obtained by Spiegel magazine reads: “Owing to the obsolescence of the rocket motor, the Strela missile is no longer safe to handle, so it can no longer be fired.”

The wooden boxes in which the missiles are stored are reportedly so mouldy that when they were last inspected in November troops had to wear protective equipment"

 

[wolviedinho]

So you said he made good points without actually being able to recall any of those points?

Lol I could not be bothered looking through his posts. If I find the time then maybe I will get back to you @domalino.

Russia bad = All agree, collective pat on the back.
Russia good = Pile on the traitor.

Does that sum it up? :)