Russian invasion of Ukraine

[ChicagoBlue]

What putin needs is China to threaten an invasion of the Republic of China, give the yanks something else to be busy cunts about.

“Busy cunts”?

I thought that was spelled “global savior for 17th & 18th century empires”?

My bad.

 

[ChicagoBlue]

I’m sure there’s a tactical reason for placing an aircraft carrier and strike group into the Med, but I can’t for the life of me think what it is when dealing with Russia? Just one of the thousands of thermonuclear weapons in their armoury would solve that ‘small problem’ should they get into conflict.

I just can’t see any situation where the US would get into a conventional war with Russia without escalation to tactical nukes and the inevitable big boys, so I don’t see the point of deploying an aircraft carrier and support group.

I’m admittedly about as ‘Civvy’ as it gets, so happy to be educated by someone who can tell me what strategic/political value they think it will provide?

You answered the question numerous times, but then skipped over it in order to get scary about nukes!

“AIRCRAFT carrier”

Control the skies over Ukraine, if invited, patrol the Black Sea, project power and see over the horizon.

The Black Sea is essential to Russia and Ukraine “almost” owns access to the northern Black Sea.

Crimea changed that, and with Ukraine, Crimea, and a friendly and compliant Turkey, it gives Russia COMPLETE control over the Black Sea, access to the Eastern Med & their new Middle Eastern seaport buddy in Syria!

Russia is doing in the “west” what China is doing in the South China Sea/Taipei/Philippines & Far East…pushing their boundaries OUT to protect from US and their Allies hemming them IN.

There are 2 Siperpowrrs in the world and a Wannabee. The Wannabee revolves around one man and his Soviet obsession. I worry less about him than the other one, which has designs on not being hemmed on by the Japan/South Korea/Taipei “oriental curtain” that hems them in. Take Taipei and they negate the southern islands of Japan being an informal blockade and can project their “new and improved” world’s fastest growing Navy into the Philippines Sea and deep water Pacific…that the US currently owns.

Get rid of Duterte and the Philippines becomes up for grabs. If China grabs it, then their power projection into the Pacific becomes very, very expensive to even attempt to replicate or address….and we all know the Royal Navy, Oz or NZ, ain’t getting that job done!

Step back and you see THE major geopolitical HOTSPOTS of the world being fought over without firing a weapon YET.

The question now is whether there is ENOUGH TRADE AND DIPLOMACY IN THE WORLD to stop these two Superpowers from taking what they feel they both deserve and need for their future protection AND power projection?

Xi Jinping (July 2021)

“The Chinese people will never allow any foreign forces to bully us. Anyone who dares to try will have their heads bashed bloody against a Great Wall of Steel.”

Hmmm, not much room for interpretation there…

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

You answered the question numerous times, but then skipped over it in order to get scary about nukes!

“AIRCRAFT carrier”

Control the skies over Ukraine, if invited, patrol the Black Sea, and see over the horizon.

And if needed, fight in the deep whilst not intervening on sovereign soil.

 

[urban genie]

It fucking doesn’t need that. My wife is Taiwanese, most of her family are there and she needs to pop back for a couple of weeks soon. Communist pricks can stay the fuck out of Taiwan.

Well it obviously doesn't need that or any other tension in the south china seas.

The point was if it ain't the ukraine then it's normally the middle east or taiwan america will be send battleships and threaten sanctions.

They have a few "go to" places globally they percieve danger and take turns to worry about invasion or conflict in each of them.

 

[BobKowalski]

I’m sure there’s a tactical reason for placing an aircraft carrier and strike group into the Med, but I can’t for the life of me think what it is when dealing with Russia? Just one of the thousands of thermonuclear weapons in their armoury would solve that ‘small problem’ should they get into conflict.

I just can’t see any situation where the US would get into a conventional war with Russia without escalation to tactical nukes and the inevitable big boys, so I don’t see the point of deploying an aircraft carrier and support group.

I’m admittedly about as ‘Civvy’ as it gets, so happy to be educated by someone who can tell me what strategic/political value they think it will provide?

It‘s about showing unity and strength. Or bluff and counter bluff. Russia builds up troops on the border and makes demands. NATO counters with a show of unity and strength. Russia are looking for weakness and division - I expect they thought they would get weakness and division, instead, bar a few missteps which you will always get in the beginning, they are getting the opposite, indeed they are pushing countries like Finland and Sweden, who declined to join NATO, into the NATO camp.

Whatever Putin is trying to achieve here, it doesn't seem to be working.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Well it obviously doesn't need that or any other tension in the south chima seas.

The point was if it ain't the ukraine then it's normally the middle east or taiwan america will be send battleships and threatwn sanctions.

They have a few "go to" places globally then take turns to worry about invasion

A big issue is that if Putin decides to try and take Ukraine, and NATO take no action, NATO will look weak and China may just decide to take Taiwan, and then Japan.

Sounds like a real life game of Risk, one move may trigger another.

 

[BobKowalski]

I’d suggest that Germany are looking at it from a commercial point of view as they’ve worked very hard to get this far with their partnerships. One could go so far to suggest that this is why Russia are pushing it so far, to ensure NordStream2 is brought online therefore bypassing the Ukraine and having direct influence on European countries.

Looks like they’ve already influenced Germany.

Germany’s position is looking increasingly isolated. Because of history, there is a tendency to shy away from confrontation and Nordstream is definitely a factor.

The Germans may come off the sidelines a little bit, but at the moment they are not even a minor player in this and I doubt if many countries in Europe are even listening to them.

 

[ChicagoBlue]

And if needed, fight in the deep whilst not intervening on sovereign soil.

Not in the Black Sea!

“Vigil” was about the Atlantic Fleet and Baltics, not the Black Sea, or even the Med, IMHO. ;-)

Deep Blue? That’s the China fight!

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Germany’s position is looking increasingly isolated. Because of history, there is a tendency to shy away from confrontation and Nordstream is definitely a factor.

The Germans may come off the sidelines a little bit, but at the moment they are not even a minor player in this and I doubt if many countries in Europe are even listening to them.

They have been incessant in their need to get this going which also gives them a huge influence.

Putin really does have influence in Europe, and we’ve brought it on ourselves.

 

[ChicagoBlue]

Germany’s position is looking increasingly isolated. Because of history, there is a tendency to shy away from confrontation and Nordstream is definitely a factor.

The Germans may come off the sidelines a little bit, but at the moment they are not even a minor player in this and I doubt if many countries in Europe are even listening to them.

The longer we can jawbone this into the Spring, the less Nordstream becomes a watershed issue.

America has disliked, and warned against, Nordstream, as it is a geopolitical weapon. However, Germany is Germany, and the U.S. can only jawbone them so much. The sooner Germany gets their solar, wind, nuke future squared away, the better!