BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,942
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Your argument is entirely rational. But we're dealing with an irrational dictator, losing, or at least not making any progress in a war which is probably existential for him.Sure, but there's no evidence to support your opinion, and a lot that very clearly refutes it.
Nuclear blackmail has served Putin very well - Nato would long ago have entered the war without it.
Nuclear use by Putin has the opposite consequence; there's no way it would not engender a massive response, even if conventional.
Then there's the fact that it probably wouldn't work militarily. The front line is 100s of miles long and he can hardly nuke the whole of it. And his poorly equipped and trained troops are hardly in position to act with the discipline and material necessary to win on an irradiated battlefield.
But it's simpler that that.
We know how Putin reacts to losing on the battlefield, because he's shown us several times. He claims to be winning, changes his definition of victory, blames everyone else and continues regardless.
Unless Ukraine marches on Moscow, any should this change?
In truth - I think that deployment of nukes is maybe 30% likely or so - but for me - it's really conceivable that he'd use them.