Kirkstall Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 6,226
- Location
- St Helens. Formally Manchester
- Team supported
- Manchester City
That’s brilliant
The UN say it’s not a war crime when Russia targets civilians a horrendous crime
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Thread starter feedmpenzaandhewillscore
- Start date
The UN say it’s not a war crime when Russia targets civilians a horrendous crime
sure, but you will have to look long and hard to find less propaganda than in the football forum war reporting. You'll get banned easily for no other reason than displaying slightest ability to think for yourself. So I'd advice people to go elsewhere for reality check on what's really going on behind the propaganda. I hope the war will end with a peaceful negotiation before it escalates to nuclear world war. You cannot beat a nuclear power without first enduring a nuclear war. It's an inevitable logical fact.The propaganda from both sides is overwhelming and I would think both sides have taken enormous losses in personnel , that can only go on for so long and with winter not far over the horizon a stalemate is approaching.
grunge
Well-Known Member
sure, but you will have to look long and hard to find less propaganda than in the football forum war reporting. You'll get banned easily for no other reason than displaying slightest ability to think for yourself. So I'd advice people to go elsewhere for reality check on what's really going on behind the propaganda. I hope the war will end with a peaceful negotiation before it escalates to nuclear world war. You cannot beat a nuclear power without first enduring a nuclear war. It's an inevitable logical fact.
Strange how Russia has lost plenty of wars and not nuked anyone yet.
yes, that's fecking strange. You are a champion of logic, here is a medal for you.Strange how Russia has lost plenty of wars and not nuked anyone yet.
So, according to your logic, Russia would not use it's full millitary power against a perceved threat if attacked by NATO because it pulled out of Afganistan?
Does that go for the usa also? It will not use nuclear weapons ever because it also pulled out / flead afganistan, leaving weaponry for billions to the millitant muslims?
Well, to sort out any confusion, russia have been very clear that nuclear weapons will be used if they need to. Dont you want to live? Or are you living for and of war?
this is exactly why war is to big to discuss in a football forum. So much pure nonsense.
Last edited:
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,013
Don’t remember Afghanistan nuking the USSR when they beat them in the 1980s.sure, but you will have to look long and hard to find less propaganda than in the football forum war reporting. You'll get banned easily for no other reason than displaying slightest ability to think for yourself. So I'd advice people to go elsewhere for reality check on what's really going on behind the propaganda. I hope the war will end with a peaceful negotiation before it escalates to nuclear world war. You cannot beat a nuclear power without first enduring a nuclear war. It's an inevitable logical fact.
The Stockport Iniesta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 9,684
Russia in Afghanistan. America in Vietnam.sure, but you will have to look long and hard to find less propaganda than in the football forum war reporting. You'll get banned easily for no other reason than displaying slightest ability to think for yourself. So I'd advice people to go elsewhere for reality check on what's really going on behind the propaganda. I hope the war will end with a peaceful negotiation before it escalates to nuclear world war. You cannot beat a nuclear power without first enduring a nuclear war. It's an inevitable logical fact.
Billy Joel could have used that line.
me neither, maybe it didn't happen?Don’t remember Afghanistan nuking the USSR when they beat them in the 1980s.
In which case I assume that you will not reply to this message and never be seen or heard from in this thread again.yes, that's fecking strange. You are a champion of logic, here is a medal for you.
So, according to your logic, Russia would not use it's full millitary power against a perceved threat if attacked by NATO because it pulled out of Afganistan?
Does that go for the usa also? It will not use nuclear weapons ever because it also pulled out / flead afganistan, leaving weaponry for billions to the millitant muslims?
Well, to sort out any confusion, russia have been very clear that nuclear weapons will be used if they need to. Dont you want to live? Or are you living for and of war?
this is exactly why war is to big to discuss in a football forum. So much pure nonsense.
Its a rare thing for me as a guest on this forum to have a direct go at anyone...but you Sir are a cock.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
If you bought a car from someone for cash and the car never turned up, would you buy another one off him the week after?sure, but you will have to look long and hard to find less propaganda than in the football forum war reporting. You'll get banned easily for no other reason than displaying slightest ability to think for yourself. So I'd advice people to go elsewhere for reality check on what's really going on behind the propaganda. I hope the war will end with a peaceful negotiation before it escalates to nuclear world war. You cannot beat a nuclear power without first enduring a nuclear war. It's an inevitable logical fact.