a week before the Russian elections would be a fine time to take out Putins Bridge,give Russians something to think on.From "The Analyst":
UPDATE 2-3 FEBRUARY
It’s been a bad week for the Russians - a really bad week.
The depth and scale of the assault on Crimea expanded yesterday as more detail emerged about the missile strikes across the peninsula, particularly on the airbase north of Sevastopol.
The death of a commanding general was just one result. What became clear was that the S-400 systems designed to protect the peninsula have failed in their jobs - largely because the Ukrainians destroyed all of the early warning radars the Russians stationed on the peninsula, then sank the corvette that was trying to provide some kind of early warning cover. That forced the
S-400’s into using their own radars and revealing themselves.
That in turn made them vulnerable to decoy missiles that they quickly engaged and HARM’s followed forcing the S-400’s to switch off as Storm Shadows blasted the airfield and it’s command centre as well as the central command bunkers at Yevapatoria.
The failure of the S-400 to do its job because of the risk to itself has become the subject of widespread criticism in the Russian milblogs. Much of its problem is its such a valuable system they can’t afford to lose, but it it’s also a lack of close range anti-air that works. The Pantsir is not very good if there is even one available.
The battles around Novomikhailivka north east of Vuhledar have been going on for some time. Russia managed at high cost to reach the defence lines on the southern edge of the village - but the cost over several long cold weeks has been increasingly high. It’s now all come to an end with a Ukrainian counter attack that drove them all the way back to their start lines. Further Russian attempts to try the same thing further round to the south resulted in mass casualties and even more equipment losses - almost all at the hands of drones and mines. Again, this is being seen as another example of command failure by Russian milblogs which have become very vocal on these two subjects.
Their frustration is that no matter what they try, progress is either incredibly costly or non-existent and the price paid isn’t even close to offering what might callously be described as value. There is also a growing push back at the death toll. Now verging on 400,000 after two years it’s starting to resonate at home.
Every death affects roughly ten people back home directly and another ten indirectly. 400,000 x 20 means that some 8 million Russians have a relationship with someone who died on the front and it’s probably twice that in reality. They may not be willing to ask the questions that need asking, but discontent simmers. Even more so when the state doesn’t pay up compensation or acknowledge those deaths in the first place with any sense of urgency or decency.
Add to all these woes the EU funding agreement for Ukraine, Sweden likely to fully join NATO very soon as Hungary stops dragging its feet, the fact that while the frontlines are barely moving Ukraine has utterly humiliated Russia in Crimea this week, and it’s all looking like a war Russia just can’t win.
The Crimea humiliation is seriously upsetting to Russians generally. They see Crimea as a stolen land that they got back - it’s the warm holiday heartland of their family histories back to the soviet era. Even Navalny said he would never give it back. To find it’s becoming progressively untenable, that its strategic value is actually becoming a burden, is hard to understand or believe.
For centuries he who holds Crimea effectively controls the Black Sea.
Modern weapons have changed that situation. Ukrainian imagination and flexibility combined with those weapons has given them effective command of the waters and skies over the eastern Black Sea without as much as having a single viable warship to their name. It’s a hard pill for the Russians to swallow. It’s also why peace without the return of Crimea remains unthinkable to both sides.
Slava Ukraini !