Go on….
no i just believe it is not a mess with no argument, that's all. I think his argument is quite clear. Not saying it's amazingly written, that was all.
Last edited:
Go on….
Couldn't agree more.Putin is the dangerous wildcard for sure, but no point making it easier for him to justify.
Get real....
no i just believe it is not a mess with no argument, that's all. I think his argument is quite clear. Not saying it's amazingly written, that was all.
Apart from anyone reading this forumCan’t we send in undercover the SAS with orders to destroy that convoy just sitting there waiting
let‘s do something undercover quick no one would no
you are a military genius and i claim my £5,Can’t we send in undercover the SAS with orders to destroy that convoy just sitting there waiting
let‘s do something undercover quick no one would no
I dont need to hes a compulsive liar!Well he’s said it at PMQs so do you have proof he’s lying?
I'm sure they are already ' helping ' .Can’t we send in undercover the SAS with orders to destroy that convoy just sitting there waiting
let‘s do something undercover quick no one would no
The pc term is advisingI'm sure they are already ' helping ' .
When we go to kill, we kill those who aren’t like us. When we go to save, we save those who are like us. It’s designed to generate indifference to the suffering of the “other side” and sympathy for those on “our side”. Racism, no - horrible, yes.
Russia has “justified” killing those like them (Ukrainians) by painting them out to be nazis (so different). It’s not racism. If we were bombing the Ukrainians we’d be making them out to be savages or summit.