Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
20 years breaking rocks followed by execution was something a work colleague suggested for some horrendous crimes.As I thought I made clear, I was referring to having any sympathy for how people like this (fo the crime, do the time, but come out very very old after life has moved on) “feel.”
I’d didn’t suggest personal umbrage at the poster, merely the sentiment, which i expressly stated.
This has been taken as some personal affront, as if I’m more outraged than anyone else. How could I even know if I was?
Rather, it was a declaration that the murderer’s feelings are irrelevant and that society has no use for him.
Whether he gets a capital death sentence, a whole life (death) sentence, or a swift “just desserts” death sentence inside, I honestly don’t care. I think it should be the latter.
Personally, I think Britain should reinstate the Death Penalty and all ”special circumstance” murder cases should be put before a panel of Judges, not jurors.
The CPS, based on evidence, could decide whether a case was deemed a “special circumstance” case, based on such things, laid out in law, as extensive planning, cruel punishment or torture before death, sexual assault prior to death, post-mortem abuse of the corpse, abuse of public office or status, etc…
Once deemed thus, the course is set. Trial, with penalty of death as sentence, if found guilty.
This would fit the bill I reckon.