Saurez [FA release investigation findings]

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I have had cause to read a handful of legal judgments in the course of my working life and one thing in particular that has struck me with them is the temperate use of language when dishing out criticism. For example if the Appeal Court says that a Judge in a lower court reached a decision that "based on the facts before us we would not have arrived at" this translates as : "he has fucked up on an epic scale".

On that basis,the use of the terms 'unconvincing' and 'inconsistent' in relation to his evidence is nothing but a condemnation of Suarez as a lying little shit.

 

[dom]

I have had cause to read a handful of legal judgments in the course of my working life and one thing in particular that has struck me with them is the temperate use of language when dishing out criticism. For example if the Appeal Court says that a Judge in a lower court reached a decision that "based on the facts before us we would not have arrived at" this translates as : "he has fucked up on an epic scale".

On that basis,the use of the terms 'unconvincing' and 'inconsistent' in relation to his evidence is nothing but a condemnation of Suarez as a lying little shit.

I noticed that too. One thing that seems to mark out Suarez's general comportmet as a player and as a person is dishonesty.

A totla shitbag who should be getting banned for being a diving twunt on a scale that make Ronaldo look like a Quaker elder

 

[PSmyth07]

Twitter is great for moments like this.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

One thing that seems to mark out Suarez's general comportmet as a player and as a person is dishonesty.

It's very late in the day, but this is my favourite Bluemoon quote of 2011.

Happy New Year, dom.

 

[squirtyflower]

I have had cause to read a handful of legal judgments in the course of my working life and one thing in particular that has struck me with them is the temperate use of language when dishing out criticism. For example if the Appeal Court says that a Judge in a lower court reached a decision that "based on the facts before us we would not have arrived at" this translates as : "he has fucked up on an epic scale".

On that basis,the use of the terms 'unconvincing' and 'inconsistent' in relation to his evidence is nothing but a condemnation of Suarez as a lying little shit.

i took that as read

 

[AlthamBlue]

Suarez report does not address vital question - how can you be racist when you are foreign anyway?

Do'h.

Somebody didn't actually say that did they?

 

[give & go]

dippers need to man up now, he said it 7 times

he said it 7 times
he said it 7 times
luis saurez said it 7 times

lying diving git

8 games not enough

 

[PSmyth07]

Suarez report does not address vital question - how can you be racist when you are foreign anyway?

Do'h.

Somebody didn't actually say that did they?

Yup, got it off Twitter. :D

 

[AlthamBlue]

Do'h.

Somebody didn't actually say that did they?

Yup, got it off Twitter. :D

Oh dear. Their delusion knows no bounds.

 

[MSP]

No doubt that prick used racist insults but if Liverpool decide to go on court it's gonna be interesting...