I had a look on the RAWK CL thread this morning.

Fuck - but they really hate us

What is piss funny is that they scream that nobody should be bothered or care about us - especially them as they are a proper club with history

And they make these comments in pages and pages of bitter posts
Fuck `em mc.
Lets go out and win the PL again this season and give the arrogant twats something to really cry about.
 
Last edited:
This is taken from the rule book.....The VAR will only intervene if he thinks the referee has missed a direct red card offence, not a yellow or second yellow. However, there are three instances when the VAR can advise a referee to issue a caution. 1) If, on reviewing a penalty it turns out there is simulation. 2) If, on reviewing an awarded goal, it turns out a player has deliberately handled the ball to score. 3) If, in dismissing a player, it is proved they have been provoked into retaliating, the player who initiated the incident could get booked.
i bow to your knowledge
 
Great comeback. A lot was stacked against us last night but the lads pulled through. Loved Zinchenkos reaction to Leroy’s free kick & from one camera angle it looked like Danilo was the first up in the bench celebrating Sterling’s winner. Says so much about our team spirit & togetherness. A small step closer to the quad.....Bring on Sunday
 
Otamendi committed a handball. He tried to get his arm out of the way but didn’t succeed. If the exact same happened to us at the other end of the pitch we’d be screaming for a penalty. Anyone who argues differently is an out and out happy clapper.

And anyone who denies VAR procedure was flawed to fcuk is a contrary arsehole.
 
I actually believe VAR will be prove to be a benefit but serious wrinkles need to be ironed out. In particular we need clarity and CONSISTENCY on:

- The circumstances when it can be invoked: clear and obvious errors or marginal decisions?
- The sanction (if any) for players calling for VAR?
- Whose decision is final?

The Ota penalty was patently in the debatable rather than obvious category. Quite a few on here thought it was an offence under the rules. Lots thought it wasn’t. Anybody saying it was clear cut is romancing. Had the ref given it first time, it would have been easier to stomach than awarding it through an invalid procedure.

Will UEFA be big enough to admit that, in hindsight, it was invalid? Will they fcuk as like.
 
So just reading Mark Halsey’s view On the incident in the paper at work

He says no way was the handball deliberate and he would not have given it
 
How can it possibly be deliberate hand ball if hes moving his hand away. Incredible.

Almost as bad as that one a few years back, I forget his name but he hits a snapshot a few yards away from Micah Richards and it bounces up and hits his thigh then his arm. Pen given. I couldn't believe it.

EDIT: lol, found it, https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/16743259

Should I be surprised.

Making me angry thinking about it now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.