Totally agree.Peter Walton’s explanation of the offside rule makes absolutely no sense at all. We see thousands of offsides given from free kicks against players “who haven’t committed an offence yet”. If that’s the trigger then the thousands of offsides given are all wrong.
It will be maligned until the process becomes completely transparent and audible
Well according to the set rules it is valid. It's a dumb rule or at least how it's used but the referee had no other option. Ask the referee forum about it.
But you don’t know they weren’t. On ours, the ball remained in play afterwards and will have been reviewed in real time as play went on. The only time the game is stopped is when the ball is out during a review.Funny how every non-decision which wasn't given and could have benefitted us if reviewed, wasn't sent to VAR. Peter Walton "the expert former ref" voices his opinion with which everyone disagrees.
Walton is a tit. Schalke player offside and interfereing with play regardless of what that simpleton says.Peter Walton’s explanation of the offside rule makes absolutely no sense at all. We see thousands of offsides given from free kicks against players “who haven’t committed an offence yet”. If that’s the trigger then the thousands of offsides given are all wrong.