Ohrodneyrodney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2007
- Messages
- 2,193
So why was the decision overturned if it wasnt clear cut
Go figure.
So why was the decision overturned if it wasnt clear cut
Fixed.So that would surely be a corner then if its wasn't City.
I think Otamendi has enough time to react and the ball is heading into the corner. He makes a fist and diverts the ball. If that was reversed I'd absolutely want a penalty.
My issue is how VAR was used tonight. How can the ref not have a monitor but the Schalke bench have?
The var officials had to be positive that the ref had made an obvious error.Go figure.
The handball is clear for me. The shots going in and Otamendi diverts the ball. The second penalty is a needless pull by Fernandinho.
We're fortunate that Schalke aren't very good.
Of course it's a great result, but it wasn't a great performance.
You need to watch the shit that Walton comes out with to justify the 2nd pen, its embarrassing
Well it should mean no v.a.r.
But your pount re you 'think' Otamendi had enough time, is the very reason it shiuldn't be a v.a.r. decision.
You can easily be wrong, therefore nothing to overturn.