Scott Sinclair (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
waspish said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
waspish said:
Why don't fans judge payers after they'd played for us?

Because I've seen him play

It's funny that I've watched every city game last 20 years and I haven't seen Scott Sinclair play for city

Ok. From now on no one in the transfer forum is allowed to comment on potential signings because we've never seen them play for City. Luke chadwick? Might be good cos no one's ever seen him play for city. Danny shittu? Might be good cos no one's ever seen him play for city etc
 
I got used to the idea of us playing hardball, then coming back in January to get him. Show clubs we won't get messed around or held to ransom.

Disappointed that he's signing for this reason, but this minor annoyance aside, footballing wise this is a decent signing
 
mansour's tow ropes said:
Benarbia said:
Maicon & Sinclair, does that mean we've moved backwards

in terms of signing big names yes, but if they are an improvement on savic and johnson respectively, then no

Is sinclair better than Johnno though? I don't think he is. Johnno was a **** I suppose but that's about it

Looks like we're stagnating whilst others have strengthened, or at least not moving forward enough
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Might as well drive our title to trafford now

when-someone-wont-stop-talking-about-their-problems.gif
 
Sweet addition to the squad. Dzeko will be thinking..............

Crosses from the bye line sir?

the-fast-show_001745_1_MainPicture.jpg
<br /><br />-- Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:03 am --<br /><br />
mcfc2607 said:
Колобок said:
mansour's tow ropes said:
in terms of signing big names yes, but if they are an improvement on savic and johnson respectively, then no
since when is Maicon not a big name in football?!!
Since when has maicon signed

Maicon hasn't signed, but to say he's not a 'name' is ridiculous even for this forum.
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
waspish said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Because I've seen him play

It's funny that I've watched every city game last 20 years and I haven't seen Scott Sinclair play for city

Ok. From now on no one in the transfer forum is allowed to comment on potential signings because we've never seen them play for City. Luke chadwick? Might be good cos no one's ever seen him play for city. Danny shittu? Might be good cos no one's ever seen him play for city etc

I see your point, just annoys me fans saying a player is rubbish or not good enough. If city thought that he wasn't good enough why are they buying him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.