M18CTID said:
Wilf Wild 1937 said:
The truth is both countries really are "better together". Administering a small but split island would be highly costly
compared to what we have now especially in terms of defence spending. Imo Scotland would be hit worse but
rUK wouldn't do well out of the breakup. The countries united in 1707 because it was in both their best interests.
It still is.
I agree. It's worked pretty well for over 300 years and I don't see any need to change things now. This isn't the same as giving Hong Kong back to the Chinese or Ireland getting independence. Despite all the banter, England and Scotland have been allies for over 3 centuries and the alliance has been a largely successful one.
Worked well for who though? Not the Scots and thats the problem from their perspective couple of examples
8.9% of the UK population paying 9.9% of the UK tax take
uk government wants to spend £52 billion on a high speed train link whereas there are still a large number of train lines in Scotland running on diesel
A UK Government (Not voted for by Scotland) introduced University fees which Scotland managed to resist for their own population.
UK government wants to renew Trident missile which will cost between £15 and £20 billion. The scots don't even want it and want the subs removing from their country.........
Good luck to the Scots today 'cos whatever way the vote turns out it looks as though they will be independent soon enough