pantalon violet again said:I want a yes vote so I can watch it go tits up
How long will it be before a campaign starts to rejoin the union? I give it ten years :-).
pantalon violet again said:I want a yes vote so I can watch it go tits up
Skashion said:Passports won't be needed IF you have the same immigration policy. Ireland, in order to be in the common travel area, has always had an immigration policy which is virtually identical to ours. An independent Scotland will therefore need either border controls, or will have no right to determine its own immigration policy.ayrshire_blue said:Blue Hefner said:If they vote 'yes' when do they actually become independent? How long is the transition period to sort things out?
2016 (I think March of that year).
Passports won't be needed, as is the case between Ireland and Northern Ireland/IOM and mainland UK etc.
And we'll use the £.
You can use the pound, but it won't be in a currency union because the UK will not want to be a lender of last resort to an economy it has no control over. Also, you cannot join the EU if you go down the sterlingisation route because it requires you to have a central bank.
Salmond is trying to convince you that you can have your cake and eat it as well.
hgblue said:pantalon violet again said:I want a yes vote so I can watch it go tits up
How long will it be before a campaign starts to rejoin the union? I give it ten years :-).
nobody can eat fifty eggs said:If Scotland vote yes does that mean our token Jockies will go back home to bonny?
Hope so ;-)
JULES said:They will use the GBP but have no control on interest rates or any lender of last resort so if things go tits up they are in serious trouble. I lot of them really have no idea just what they are voting for. It is turkey's voting for Christmas.
Salmond has done a great job of whipping them up into a nationalistic frenzy. However with Salmond it is all about ideology and ideologists do not not have any care or concern for the consequences that a 'Yes' vote will entail.
A country gets the government it deserves...
Gabriel said:Ancient Citizen said:I very much doubt that. Spain is and always has been, vehemently anti secessionist and it would take monumental bribes from Brussels to calm them down, something that they would probably feel is way too much trouble. In common with others on here, I cannot understand how the Jocks are thinking of taking such a monumental decision, when currency, EU membership, defence etc; questions have not been answered at all.Gabriel said:As Barroso himself stated on Andy Marr's show, when pushed hard, it would be difficult for Scotland to rejoin the EU. However, he never said it would be impossible. Moreover, with a political perspective that is more in tune with other EU Members than say, England, I suspect Scotland would not be kept out of the fold for too long. As the centre of horse trading par excellence, Brussels would likely see deals cut to satisfy all parties.
However, now that it looks like they'll be getting even more concessions if they vote no, I fervently hope the yes vote wins by a landslide.
Part of being in the European Union is stomaching unpalatable decisions, and Spain really isn't in the strongest position to oppose Scottish entry. At heart, the EU prefers to include rather than exclude, so Scotland would probably be more welcome than unwelcome. For Eurocrats, there would also be the added piquancy of having Scotland in the EU at a time when England is considering a position of self-isolation. On the matter of defence, I posted a link earlier which sets out potential scenarios, though I agree the immediate currency matter remains the most nettlesome. Perhaps the 'Jocks' simply want to determine their own destiny henceforth.
ayrshire_blue said:Nail on the head mate. Your last sentence pretty much sums it up. It's never going to be a decision taken without any risks. But the fact of the matter is it's neither going to be a utopia nor go completely tits up. I'm prepared to take the risk of being slightly worse off in the short term for the benefit to future generations in the longer term. I'm prepared to do it, but that still doesn't mean I think we will be any worse off at all.
"Papa why are we living in a country which has lots of rich people who keep getting richer and lots of poor people who keep getting poorer"
"Because I voted no 50 years ago".
metalblue said:ayrshire_blue said:Nail on the head mate. Your last sentence pretty much sums it up. It's never going to be a decision taken without any risks. But the fact of the matter is it's neither going to be a utopia nor go completely tits up. I'm prepared to take the risk of being slightly worse off in the short term for the benefit to future generations in the longer term. I'm prepared to do it, but that still doesn't mean I think we will be any worse off at all.
"Papa why are we living in a country which has lots of rich people who keep getting richer and lots of poor people who keep getting poorer"
"Because I voted no 50 years ago".
Do you honestly think that mate? The vote will be too close to not change the landscape forever, if you vote no the next time the independence debate comes up is when/if we get the EU referendum. example; Scotland wants to stay in, England doesn't.
Scotland is ill prepared for it now but Salmond will be under no doubt the policy areas he needs concrete for his next stab at the debate if a no vote prevails.