metalblue said:
ayrshire_blue said:
Nail on the head mate. Your last sentence pretty much sums it up. It's never going to be a decision taken without any risks. But the fact of the matter is it's neither going to be a utopia nor go completely tits up. I'm prepared to take the risk of being slightly worse off in the short term for the benefit to future generations in the longer term. I'm prepared to do it, but that still doesn't mean I think we will be any worse off at all.
"Papa why are we living in a country which has lots of rich people who keep getting richer and lots of poor people who keep getting poorer"
"Because I voted no 50 years ago".
Do you honestly think that mate? The vote will be too close to not change the landscape forever, if you vote no the next time the independence debate comes up is when/if we get the EU referendum. example; Scotland wants to stay in, England doesn't.
Scotland is ill prepared for it now but Salmond will be under no doubt the policy areas he needs concrete for his next stab at the debate if a no vote prevails.
I honestly think Scotland, and indeed you guys up north, will continue to become worse off in the result of a no vote. Westminster lie to us on a regular basis so I've no doubt they're continuing to do so at the moment.
I've heard a lot of those in the no camp who are of the same opinion as you mate. I.e. vote No just now with a view to a yes vote further down the line. I'm just in the way of thinking that if independence will eventually be gained then why not now?
Of course you could say there's unanswered questions, but there's always going to be unanswered questions in such an event until it actually happens. Questions which are impossible to answer at the moment as 100% fact.
There's a difference between that and being ill prepared though.
What we do know is that while independence might not have some answers, Westminster certainly do and they're not looking good.