You don't do debate mate. I dont agree with anything you have written but don't care enough about your opinion to make the effort to respond to you as you will just rant like you did in your last post. Have a good one.We’re having a debate. How’s it a rant?
I think this means that you cannot come back to my points and therefore agree?
I have come to the conclusion that I don't really care much or agree with most of the stuff that you write. I think I will leave it at that. Have a good one.
You don't do debate mate. I dont agree with anything you have written but don't care enough about your opinion to make the effort to respond to you as you will just rant like you did in your last post. Have a good one.
A federal system would put decision making nearer to where it had effect. Would not the bleating of nationalists be silenced?Or rename the lot and call it something else like Great Nirvana, but nationalists on all sides would cringe at that plan. They don't want to be together the politicians in all the home nations want power in their own neck of the woods. In reality the little people the average Jack and Jill just want to get on with their lives without listening to the constant bleating of the power hungry nationalists on all sides.
A federal system would put decision making nearer to where it had effect. Would not the bleating of nationalists be silenced?
That would be true, had Scotland voted Yes in 2014, most called for a rerun of the vote and the SNP gained their biggest majority for half a century.
But fundamentally they lost in 2014 and many will vote SNP without supporting independence, because they’re the only viable centrist party in Scotland.
I think my work here is done.
No mate, i just dont want to take hours arguing the toss with someone whose mind is already made up. Thats called futility. If I respected your views then I might be tempted to put the effort in.Again, this just smacks of “shit I don’t have a response to this as it’s correct”.
Enjoy your day.
No you can't but you can counter the arguments of the nationalists and offer, the growing support amongst some unionists that voted no last time and are having second thoughts, an alternative to full independence.If we were all one country it would be silenced even more, no matter what the eventuality there are still going to be dissidents we can't keep everyone happy bud.
A fair point,but that's not really what's happening here is it?at the time of the last vote they were told leaving the union meant losing their right to be in the eu and I believe they voted accordingly.The mandate from the Scottish people was set in 2014 and I don’t believe in rerunning referenda until one side gets what they wish. It’s terribly irresponsible and thrusts whole geographical regions into being unstable.
Well I'm not a fan of theirs either but they do have just cause and mandate to hold another voteThe SNP and their followers are but a blip in the history of the UK and I’ll be damned if their nationalist, English hating, detail lacking screeches break up the union.
I see no merit in breaking up the union,but I see absolutely none in the denial of democracyNow if you want to debate the merits of breaking up the union, I’m here for you
Mrs Merkel said the other day that Brexit showed the need for EU to listen more to the people. In our case, however, Cameron was hopelessly under prepared and couldn't articulate our doubts and fears.No you can't but you can counter the arguments of the nationalists and offer, the growing support amongst some unionists that voted no last time and are having second thoughts, an alternative to full independence.
That is one argument put forward about brexit after all that if the EU had been more flexible Cameron wouldn't have lost the referendum may not even have had one.