Seat Counters - 2024/25

Maybe its just because I live in Ireland and getting over to see City is a novelty, and it would be different if I was a season ticket holder, but I'm amazed at the amount of times I read on here and on X about fans who have tickets for home matches but don't go cos they can't be arsed or because of the weather.
 
If Forest hadn’t taken all 3 tiers of the away end. (Credit to them), I think City would have discounted tickets being sold in the South Stand L3 like they did against Brentford last season.
That’s right, Tim. Clearly, there is wider problems about ticketing and the efficacy of the group, but this is a win for City Matters.

We asked (Mark Todd in particular) that returned tickets from the visiting allocation be capped at £30. The Club have agreed and that should be policy from now on.
 
That’s right, Tim. Clearly, there is wider problems about ticketing and the efficacy of the group, but this is a win for City Matters.

We asked (Mark Todd in particular) that returned tickets from the visiting allocation be capped at £30. The Club have agreed and that should be policy from now on.
While a positive it is a double edge for those who can't go selling on ticket exchange being undercut. So I can see how it benefits the club too.
 
That’s right, Tim. Clearly, there is wider problems about ticketing and the efficacy of the group, but this is a win for City Matters.

We asked (Mark Todd in particular) that returned tickets from the visiting allocation be capped at £30. The Club have agreed and that should be policy from now on.
Thanks Alex
 
All the bullshit labels we get like Emptihad etc is because nobody at City has ever thought empty seats in the South Stand in full view of tv cameras was worth addressing.

There are 100 reasons why selling cheap kids season tickets behind the goal might be empty for midweek games - but ffs City sort it.

I know this wasn’t the case last night but can never get my head around why for some games the away team returns the top tier in the north stand which is then full of blues, yet there is a group on 20 empty seats behind the goal in full view of the tv cameras.

Last night somebody should have sole responsibility to make sure those blocks are full.
 
That’s right, Tim. Clearly, there is wider problems about ticketing and the efficacy of the group, but this is a win for City Matters.

We asked (Mark Todd in particular) that returned tickets from the visiting allocation be capped at £30. The Club have agreed and that should be policy from now on.
Whilst that is a benefit to the fans purchasing the £30 tickets, I don't think it helps fill the rest of the stands and possibly discourages it too whole people wait for the cheaper tickets to become available.
Plus, I'd rather have the 3rd tier of the away end empty rather than parts of the rest of the ground purely for aesthetic purposes.
 
-“It's only Forrest”
Never really understood that statement, do people actually go to watch other teams?
So all the no shows last night, will be back to watch the rags next game!
I agree mate..I go to watch City.. regardless of the opposition..yeah it's good when we play the so called bigger games but at the end of the day whether it's Madrid or Macclesfield it's City we go to watch
 
Whilst that is a benefit to the fans purchasing the £30 tickets, I don't think it helps fill the rest of the stands and possibly discourages it too whole people wait for the cheaper tickets to become available.
Plus, I'd rather have the 3rd tier of the away end empty rather than parts of the rest of the ground purely for aesthetic purposes.
I think fans buying last minute tickets across the South Stand for the Brentford game got the £30 tickets too. There’s always going to be pros and cos with every ticket decision that’s made if we scrutinise in very fine detail. If the overall impact is positive that’s good enough for me.
 
Last edited:
Whilst that is a benefit to the fans purchasing the £30 tickets, I don't think it helps fill the rest of the stands and possibly discourages it too whole people wait for the cheaper tickets to become available.
Plus, I'd rather have the 3rd tier of the away end empty rather than parts of the rest of the ground purely for aesthetic purposes.
I take your point, but I think a lot of this could be solved if the Club didn’t have incredibly high matchday prices to start with. If Forest had returned the upper tier, for example, there would have been around a £15-20 gap between what City fans were paying in neighbouring blocks in South Level 3. That’s before you consider the £35 membership to begin with.

I think it’s also fair to say that most matchday members don’t have the liberty of waiting for cheaper tickets, given the Club’s All Games on Sale policy. A reversion to the old system, or at least one that released tickets a few months in advance, would probably be much fairer for members.
 
I take your point, but I think a lot of this could be solved if the Club didn’t have incredibly high matchday prices to start with. If Forest had returned the upper tier, for example, there would have been around a £15-20 gap between what City fans were paying in neighbouring blocks in South Level 3. That’s before you consider the £35 membership to begin with.
As I said in an earlier post the individual match day prices don't affect me as I'm a season ticket holder as well as an foc but I took think the match day prices are ridiculous.
The club need to see it from the perspective of our fan base who are predominantly working class people often with families and facing rising cost of living expenses.
I'm sure if they lowered the match day ticket prices and made it much more affordable for parents to take their children to games it would be beneficial in the long term..after all we have a fairly aging fan base and the kids are our fans of the future..the ones who will replace us when we aren't able to go to games anymore because of age/ health etc.
The £35 membership should be lowered to a nominal amount or scrapped altogether.
By the way I'm not having a pop at you Alex..it's the hierarchy who set the ridiculous prices I'm not happy with.
 
I think fans buying last minute tickets across the South Stand for the Brentford game got the £30 tickets too. There’s always going to be pros and cos with every ticket decision that’s made if we scrutinise in very fine detail. If the overall impact is positive that’s good enough for me.
It’s only the tickets in the away section that are reduced to £30. So those in 315/316/317 etc still pay the higher amount.
 
It’s only the tickets in the away section that are reduced to £30. So those in 315/316/317 etc still pay the higher amount.
Thanks for the info Buckshaw Blue. I know most of the SSL3 tickets are resold away from the official ticket exchange so apart from the very biggest games, tickets can be picked up for around £30 on the face value ticket pages.
 
As I said in an earlier post the individual match day prices don't affect me as I'm a season ticket holder as well as an foc but I took think the match day prices are ridiculous.
The club need to see it from the perspective of our fan base who are predominantly working class people often with families and facing rising cost of living expenses.
I'm sure if they lowered the match day ticket prices and made it much more affordable for parents to take their children to games it would be beneficial in the long term..after all we have a fairly aging fan base and the kids are our fans of the future..the ones who will replace us when we aren't able to go to games anymore because of age/ health etc.
The £35 membership should be lowered to a nominal amount or scrapped altogether.
By the way I'm not having a pop at you Alex..it's the hierarchy who set the ridiculous prices I'm not happy with.
I don't think the £35 membership is a big deal, it gets you a £5 discount on tickets plus 10% off in the shop and food and drink. I pay it,go to about 6 or 7 games don't buy much from the shop,but probably get a few pounds back through that ,but usually buy a drink sometimes a pie,so I get more than my £35 back,over a season.
 
I don't think the £35 membership is a big deal, it gets you a £5 discount on tickets plus 10% off in the shop and food and drink. I pay it,go to about 6 or 7 games don't buy much from the shop,but probably get a few pounds back through that ,but usually buy a drink sometimes a pie,so I get more than my £35 back,over a season.
Fair enough mate..but if a family of 4 buy a membership it's £140 before they even buy a ticket.
I guess if you go to 7 games it pays for itself but still unfair expecting families to pay for individual membership..maybe £50 for a family of up to four would be fairer
 
Fair enough mate..but if a family of 4 buy a membership it's £140 before they even buy a ticket.
I guess if you go to 7 games it pays for itself but still unfair expecting families to pay for individual membership..maybe £50 for a family of up to four would be fairer
Yes, maybe there should be a familly membership, though think childrens membership is cheaper, From memory which may be off my sons when he was under 18 was £20.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top