Sergio Aguero

[uncle charlie wilson]

Don't need him? He's better than any of your strikers mate as his previous 2 season goal record shows.

I rate Drogba higher, last season he contracted Malaria which is the definition of a freak occurrence.

As for Torres, this season is his judgement day.

All that aside, we don't need him, we have 4 centre forwards with Drogba being the oldest. We're about to get Lukaku. There just isn't any justification to spend £50m on another player we don't need.

Besides, even if AVB decided to get another top striker, why would it be Tevez when Aguero is on the open market for less money, better age, no baggage and frankly a better player? Should that thought cross his mind, it'd be more likely to be Aguero than Tevez. But again, the position has enough depth already.

So much fuckwittery in this post.

Tevez is the highest goalscorer in the Prem the past two seasons, it doesn't matter who you 'rate', as a striker Tevez has been the best in the PL. You didn't need Torres, infact it probably hampered your title challenge and cost your manager his job yet you dropped your pants and spunked the best part of what it would now cost to get Tevez on a striker who scored one goal... assisted by a puddle.

Fact is as good as Drogba was/is he's got few years at the top remaining, Anelka similar and with Chelsea's ability to play him in every position bar striker, i get the impression he's not a long term answer. Sturridge may have the ability but he's yet to break into the Chelsea ranks fully and Torres, well... let's see. He's not looked anything like the striker he became at Liverpool for the best part of 18 months.

In summary: Tevez would walk into the Chelsea side, infact he'd walk into pretty much any side in the world.

Tbh, I think your post contains marginally more fuckwittery.

 

[Castiel]

So much fuckwittery in this post.

Tevez is the highest goalscorer in the Prem the past two seasons, it doesn't matter who you 'rate', as a striker Tevez has been the best in the PL. You didn't need Torres, infact it probably hampered your title challenge and cost your manager his job yet you dropped your pants and spunked the best part of what it would now cost to get Tevez on a striker who scored one goal... assisted by a puddle.

Fact is as good as Drogba was/is he's got few years at the top remaining, Anelka similar and with Chelsea's ability to play him in every position bar striker, i get the impression he's not a long term answer. Sturridge may have the ability but he's yet to break into the Chelsea ranks fully and Torres, well... let's see. He's not looked anything like the striker he became at Liverpool for the best part of 18 months.

In summary: Tevez would walk into the Chelsea side, infact he'd walk into pretty much any side in the world.

So am I to understand if the positions were reversed you'd support a £50m bid for a player with so much personal baggage that he can't stick around for more than two seasons when you have just spent £50m on a striker six months earlier with two young strikers trying to break through already in your squad?

Personally, I'd call that "fuckwittery."

Its not at all a question of Tevez's ability, its a question of what we need, and the point I made about the position already having sufficient depth therefore absolutely ruling out the possibility of Chelsea bidding for Tevez stands. If you had read that rather than spring to conclusions you'd have realised that.

To clarify the other huge assumption you made, I rate Drogba higher for Chelsea, because he has been the stable of our attack with the team built around him for years. Tevez would not do a better job for us than he does.

Oh and by the way, Drogba was the top scorer in 2009/10 with 29 so you're slightly off there. Tevez was 4th.

 

[Ticket For Schalke]

So much fuckwittery in this post.

Tevez is the highest goalscorer in the Prem the past two seasons, it doesn't matter who you 'rate', as a striker Tevez has been the best in the PL. You didn't need Torres, infact it probably hampered your title challenge and cost your manager his job yet you dropped your pants and spunked the best part of what it would now cost to get Tevez on a striker who scored one goal... assisted by a puddle.

Fact is as good as Drogba was/is he's got few years at the top remaining, Anelka similar and with Chelsea's ability to play him in every position bar striker, i get the impression he's not a long term answer. Sturridge may have the ability but he's yet to break into the Chelsea ranks fully and Torres, well... let's see. He's not looked anything like the striker he became at Liverpool for the best part of 18 months.

In summary: Tevez would walk into the Chelsea side, infact he'd walk into pretty much any side in the world.

So am I to understand if the positions were reversed you'd support a £50m bid for a player with so much personal baggage that he can't stick around for more than two seasons when you have just spent £50m on a striker six months earlier with two young strikers trying to break through already in your squad?

Personally, I'd call that "fuckwittery."

Its not at all a question of Tevez's ability, its a question of what we need, and the point I made about the position already having sufficient depth therefore absolutely ruling out the possibility of Chelsea bidding for Tevez stands. If you had read that rather than spring to conclusions you'd have realised that.

To clarify the other huge assumption you made, I rate Drogba higher for Chelsea, because he has been the stable of our attack with the team built around him for years. Tevez would not do a better job for us than he does.

Oh and by the way, Drogba was the top scorer in 2009/10 with 29 so you're slightly off there. Tevez was 4th.

Signs of decline then maybe in Drogba, Still managed to play 36 games last season with only 11 scored.

 

[Castiel]

Signs of decline then maybe in Drogba, Still managed to play 36 games last season with only 11 scored.

He is getting old. But like I said, last season being his worst coincided with him getting a particularly nasty disease in Malaria. I think thats why we're bringing in Lukaku anyway. His career as a top level striker has two seasons left in it at the very most.

 

[sbm]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA3bBxJF5u4[/youtube]

Interesting observations from Hunter, particularly his balanced views regarding the prospects of Aguero to City.

 

[Ticket For Schalke]

Signs of decline then maybe in Drogba, Still managed to play 36 games last season with only 11 scored.

He is getting old. But like I said, last season being his worst coincided with him getting a particularly nasty disease in Malaria. I think thats why we're bringing in Lukaku anyway. His career as a top level striker has two seasons left in it at the very most.

Big gamble Lukaku, not done much other than score a few in Belgium.

 

[Castiel]

Big gamble Lukaku, not done much other than score a few in Belgium.

Roman's in a gambling mood this summer it seems. Thats football, we took a gamble on a 20 year old Robben for £12m and I think that turned out pretty well. You'll be taking a risk on Aguero (albeit lesser as his quality is undeniable) but I'd bet he'll be sensational in the Prem.

 

[Ticket For Schalke]

Big gamble Lukaku, not done much other than score a few in Belgium.

Roman's in a gambling mood this summer it seems. Thats football, we took a gamble on a 20 year old Robben for £12m and I think that turned out pretty well. You'll be taking a risk on Aguero (albeit lesser as his quality is undeniable) but I'd bet he'll be sensational in the Prem.

Lol i was just winding you up, waiting for you to do what all fans do, reverse it on us regarding our team, gooney does it alot ;)

 

[Tevez City]

Is this thread about Sergio Aguero or Chelsea strikers ?

 

[the goats backside]

MEN backtracked on us not going for Aguero while Tevez still here, like we didnt already know