Serious question relating to us and FFP(update P17)

jake28 said:
ped said:
i have just read ricki lambert "the owner is very ambitious he wants to take this club into the champs legue"HOW?

In fairness Southampton did vote against it though.
they didnt,city,swansea ,fulham wba ,qpr ,villa ,reading abstained,
 
ped said:
jake28 said:
ped said:
i have just read ricki lambert "the owner is very ambitious he wants to take this club into the champs legue"HOW?

In fairness Southampton did vote against it though.
they didnt,city,swansea ,fulham wba ,qpr ,villa ,reading abstained,
They did. QPR voted in favour iirc.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
ped said:
jake28 said:
In fairness Southampton did vote against it though.
they didnt,city,swansea ,fulham wba ,qpr ,villa ,reading abstained,
They did. QPR voted in favour iirc.
<br /><br />-- Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:25 pm --<br /><br />
ped said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
ped said:
they didnt,city,swansea ,fulham wba ,qpr ,villa ,reading abstained,
They did. QPR voted in favour iirc.
fair enough my information came from karen brady quotes, she could be mistaken,
 
I'm no cynic said:
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk

Some interesting reading here. City's net spend on transfers this season is £15m. Last year it was £57m. The three years before that totalled net spending in excess of £100m annually, and the season before that [Thaksin's year], it was £59m. Our spending has been pulled in sharply over the past two years, and with a hike in turnover, the expected departure of two of our non-featuring high earners, plus the possible sale of a few others, the books are beginning to look quite healthy.

If City are confident of reaching the UEFA target, then reaching the EPL version of FFP should be quite a doddle.
Yes but the team is worse than last year and going backwards while our main rivals are buying the best player in the league! Forget the future, FFP has already beaten us this season.
 
Let's not be under any illusion - even if Van Persie had signed for the rags without FFP ruining our bid for him, without FFP we would have gone and bought a Falcao or Cavani this January to replace Balotelli. We simply can't do this anymore and it fucking stinks of corruption.
 
Shaelumstash said:
I'm no cynic said:
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk

Some interesting reading here. City's net spend on transfers this season is £15m. Last year it was £57m. The three years before that totalled net spending in excess of £100m annually, and the season before that [Thaksin's year], it was £59m. Our spending has been pulled in sharply over the past two years, and with a hike in turnover, the expected departure of two of our non-featuring high earners, plus the possible sale of a few others, the books are beginning to look quite healthy.

If City are confident of reaching the UEFA target, then reaching the EPL version of FFP should be quite a doddle.
Yes but the team is worse than last year and going backwards while our main rivals are buying the best player in the league! Forget the future, FFP has already beaten us this season.

We beat our selves - Dembelle and we bought Rodwell and Garcia

Maicon please
Let AJ go and bought Sinclair

We spent 50 Nillion but regarldess of what and who we bought QPR, today West Ham and Pool there is no excuse for the lack of effort and committment
 
Johnsonontheleft said:
Let's not be under any illusion - even if Van Persie had signed for the rags without FFP ruining our bid for him, without FFP we would have gone and bought a Falcao or Cavani this January to replace Balotelli. We simply can't do this anymore and it fucking stinks of corruption.

Nope both Atleti and Napoli wouldn't sell in January and both players are loyal enough to stick around until the end of the season nothing to do with FFP.
 
dctid said:
Shaelumstash said:
I'm no cynic said:
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk

Some interesting reading here. City's net spend on transfers this season is £15m. Last year it was £57m. The three years before that totalled net spending in excess of £100m annually, and the season before that [Thaksin's year], it was £59m. Our spending has been pulled in sharply over the past two years, and with a hike in turnover, the expected departure of two of our non-featuring high earners, plus the possible sale of a few others, the books are beginning to look quite healthy.

If City are confident of reaching the UEFA target, then reaching the EPL version of FFP should be quite a doddle.
Yes but the team is worse than last year and going backwards while our main rivals are buying the best player in the league! Forget the future, FFP has already beaten us this season.

We beat our selves - Dembelle and we bought Rodwell and Garcia

Maicon please
Let AJ go and bought Sinclair

We spent 50 Nillion but regarldess of what and who we bought QPR, today West Ham and Pool there is no excuse for the lack of effort and committment
Well AJ was shite, admittidly far better than Sinclair, but still shite. Garcia awful, Rodwell a crock, Maicon a stop gap, no one to replace Balotelli. All in all, our transfer dealings since we won the league have been nothing short of an abomination. Down to appalling transfer dealings by Marwood, and the fact we have had to slash the wage bill because of FFP
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.