Fuzzmaster101
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,735
tommytheblue said:lastmanback said:my idea of counter attack is not 1 player making a run on his own, while the whole midfield watch on beside
the defenders, counter attack does not exist in the mancini set up. 4 defenders, 3 defensive midfielders and the forwards
covering for shit full backs. counter attack does not happen to successfully in this formation. imo
we counter attacked a few times..and looked good doing so. It was defensive lapses that cost us the game.
i dont think you really know what your talking about...
Oh come on! Defensive lapses? That's poor. You seriously think the only reason we lost was because of a couple of defesive lapses. If that's the case how did the ball get in our half in the first place? You're simplifying the game of football a bit there aren't you. Yes there were lapses but there were also numerous attacks by united which eventually caused those lapses. There was also very little happening in our midfield to take pressure off our defense. there were long periods where Ushited were in posession and when we eventually got the ball we were unable to successfully play the ball out of trouble and gave it back to them.
I don't want to slag off our team I thought they played their hearts out but you can't just sweep away a disappointing result like that with a simple defensive lapses excuse. They could easily have scored more and I thought Boyata, Richards and Kompany all had excellent games so there must have been more to the loss than your simplified reason.