Shamima Begum

Are you the forum's visiting professor of law?

Article 15 of the 1948 universal Declaration of Human Rights. " Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality"

she still has a nationality that she's already chosen so the above does not apply
 
Good grief. Is that all you have?
And here I was thinking you were an intelligent man.
Poor judgement on my part, no need to apologise, you've just shown your level.
No. There’s loads to say, but it’s not worth conversing with you any further.

Thanks for the chat. No doubt we’ll chat again when the inevitable happens and she returns here to be tried, like grown up countries do.

Until then, bask in the final couple of years of our utterly shite government.

Over and out,
 
Lol, yeah, I’m a huge terrorist sympathiser. So much so that I want her to return home and face trial for her antics.
From the statements you have made I have no reason not to believe you.

Further when you describe terrorist organization members actions as "antics" just says everything about what your viewpoint of terrorists is.
 
From the statements you have made I have no reason not to believe you.

Further when you describe terrorist organization members actions as "antics" just says everything about what your viewpoint of terrorists is.
Do you really believe that, or have you misinterpreted my posts?

All I want is for her to be tried for her antics/crimes (add whatever extra word that you want here), like all other countries do to abide by international law.
 
Article 15 of the 1948 universal Declaration of Human Rights. " Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality"

she still has a nationality that she's already chosen so the above does not apply

Citation? She never made a choice.

So there are three parties to the dispute (in general, not the legal hearings in the UK)

The UK

Begum

Bangladesh

Two of the three claim she was never a dual national or a citizen of Bangladesh and never made an application.

It’s at least in dispute, if it wasn’t it wouldn't be subject to current legal proceedings.
 
Last edited:
No. There’s loads to say, but it’s not worth conversing with you any further.

Thanks for the chat. No doubt we’ll chat again when the inevitable happens and she returns here to be tried, like grown up countries do.

Until then, bask in the final couple of years of our utterly shite government.

Over and out,
Amen to that fella. Sorry if I came across as a bit of a twat, but like you, I speak my mind, nothing personal.
Im sad you don't think I'm worth conversing with.
We are all blues, and have our views.
I'll willingly buy you a pint next time you're down for a game.
No hard feelings mate, life is too short
 
Amen to that fella. Sorry if I came across as a bit of a twat, but like you, I speak my mind, nothing personal.
Im sad you don't think I'm worth conversing with.
We are all blues, and have our views.
I'll willingly buy you a pint next time you're down for a game.
No hard feelings mate, life is too short
Same. It doesn’t always come across right anyway. I’ve got another guy thinking I like the woman!
 
Citation? She never made a choice.

So there are three parties to the dispute (in general, not the legal hearings in the UK)

The UK

Begum

Bangladesh

Two of the three claim she was never a dual national or a citizen of Bangladesh and never made an application.

It’s at least in dispute, if it wasn’t it wouldn't be subject to current legal proceedings.

Under Bangladeshi law anyone born by parents born in Bangladesh is Bangladeshi automatically. She had a dormant dual citizenship so it doesn't matter what Begum or Bangladesh says. International law has not been broken in this case.
 
Citation? She never made a choice.

So there are three parties to the dispute (in general, not the legal hearings in the UK)

The UK

Begum

Bangladesh

Two of the three claim she was never a dual national or a citizen of Bangladesh and never made an application.

It’s at least in dispute, if it wasn’t it wouldn't be subject to current legal proceedings.
I think you'll find she was automatically a Bangladeshi citizen the second she was born and doesn't have to apply until she's 21.So if she want's a nationality she better get writing but I'm pretty certain she's unwanted.
 
Under Bangladeshi law anyone born by parents born in Bangladesh is Bangladeshi automatically. She had a dormant dual citizenship so it doesn't matter what Begum or Bangladesh says. International law has not been broken in this case.

You seem too certain to be a law professor, mate. Oxbridge?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top