gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
There’s plenty of Oxbridge cunts whose arses I’ve kicked :-)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Shamima Begum
- Thread starter SuperstarNeilC
- Start date
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Fry’s ad-lib of that line led to Atkinsons somewhat surprised rejoinder of “Well quite”.Oxford’s an absolute dump.
In my humble opinion, ‘Goes forth‘ has to be one of the very best set of comedy episodes ever written and performed.
Saddo that I am, I watch it every couple of years, and it’s as funny today as it was then.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
There’s plenty of Oxbridge cunts whose arses I’ve kicked :-)
I have no doubt you have.
A place that produces 3rd rate vaccines and 3rd rate politicians but plenty of 1st rate arseholes.
I don’t think he’d have to personally pay tbh.Like I said, if you are prepared to pay for the repatriation of a known terrorist sympathiser and then pay for her incarceration then you obviously have more money than me.
I wouldn’t really begrudge my taxpayer money being used to give her a fair trial. That’s how civilised societies should operate.I don't think anyone would pay, that was the point. But collectively we will pay, like it or not.
Not, in my case.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
Anybody else want a refund for paying for Ian Huntley and Rosemary West's bed and board?
dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
Are they dark-skinned?Anybody else want a refund for paying for Ian Huntley and Rosemary West's bed and board?
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Quite right.I wouldn’t really begrudge my taxpayer money being used to give her a fair trial. That’s how civilised societies should operate.
Considering we’ve got over 400 actual fighters back in this country (and tried some, at least) suggests that this is nothing more than politicking on a grand scale. Those fighters are either wandering around now, or will be released one day and our politicians are seriously suggesting she’s more dangerous than any of them?
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
Are they dark-skinned?
How about Peter Sutcliffe?
Yes you're right, I can't really argue against that, but I will.I wouldn’t really begrudge my taxpayer money being used to give her a fair trial. That’s how civilised societies should operate.
What on earth are you talking about?
She's a terrorist sympathiser with 3 kids, and you advocate her return to the UK so she can be tried and convicted and imprisoned at our cost?
Leave her where she is, I don't see anything wrong with that. She was more than happy to go and join isis, and you think that's OK?
Ban me if you want I don't give a fuck, but welcoming terrorists back to our shores is just wrong and you need to have a fucking re-think
(Don't ban me)
I think she should face the consequences of her actions, in a British court as a British citizen.Yes you're right, I can't really argue against that, but I will.
What on earth are you talking about?
She's a terrorist sympathiser with 3 kids, and you advocate her return to the UK so she can be tried and convicted and imprisoned at our cost?
Leave her where she is, I don't see anything wrong with that. She was more than happy to go and join isis, and you think that's OK?
Ban me if you want I don't give a fuck, but welcoming terrorists back to our shores is just wrong and you need to have a fucking re-think
(Don't ban me)
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,379
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
I don't think anyone is suggesting welcoming her back, just bringing her back to face trial.Yes you're right, I can't really argue against that, but I will.
What on earth are you talking about?
She's a terrorist sympathiser with 3 kids, and you advocate her return to the UK so she can be tried and convicted and imprisoned at our cost?
Leave her where she is, I don't see anything wrong with that. She was more than happy to go and join isis, and you think that's OK?
Ban me if you want I don't give a fuck, but welcoming terrorists back to our shores is just wrong and you need to have a fucking re-think
(Don't ban me)
Bigga
Well-Known Member
As a taxpayer, i'd rather not pay for her repatriation, trial, and subsequent imprisonment.
As a taxpayer I'd rather not pay for bombs sold to other countries, paying for fraudulent firms that are pally with the Gov and subsidising big business to fleece me.
But bringing back a silly girl to charge her is pushing the boundaries of decency...?
The mindset of people on this thread that have this argument against the woman, based upon the above, is beyond crazy.
I think you're probably right.I think she should face the consequences of her actions, in a British court as a British citizen.
But a part of me doesn't want this woman back on British soil, because of her actions.
I concede though, you are absolutely correct.
Sometimes my emotions get the better of me, especially when it comes to the subject in hand, for reasons best kept to myself.
I thank you for the debate, I'll bow out of this one now.
Cheers ric
Plays By Sense Of Smell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 12,081
I'm impressed by your self-discipline.I absolutely am!
If I could I'd get less done than if I had an Xbox.
goalmole
Well-Known Member
She didn't have Bangladeshi nationality, she has a tenuous link to Bangladeshi nationality through a parent or grandparent, I don't know which.I believe she had dual nationality before being stripped of British nationality so technically she's not British but Bangladeshi, how many are arguing about her repatriation there I wonder.
Much the same as the English lads who end up playing for the Republic of Ireland football team.
If I'm not mistaken, the Bangladeshi government have refused to recognise any entitlement she might have to Bangladeshi nationality.
So that makes her as British as you, me or anyone else with a British passport.
The British government can't just wash her hands of her.
A case in some international court would be interesting.
goalmole
Well-Known Member
Pointless?I neither read the mail or support farage (not saying you accused me of either)
But it seems to me that dragging this woman through the courts and putting her in prison would be a bit pointless, and costly.
Giving people a fair trial before pronouncing judgement and sentence is what makes us the society and nation we are.
It's what stops the weak being thrown into dungeons on the whim of the powerful (in this case a Home Secretary) because it might suit them politically.
Some of the "let her rot" brigade need to think through the ultimate consequences of what they are advocating.
Last edited: