Shootings in Paris

johnmc said:
ArdwickBlue said:
johnmc said:
No. No need as I know what the universal answer will be.

Nice swerve though.

That's a shame, I was willing to join in. ;-o

I edited my post above, no swerve intended.

Fair play. I've never known anyone who has such a keen interest in religion without themselves being religious. So, on a serious note, you must see good and bad in every religion and given you are interested in all religions you must know that given all the different theories they all can't be correct and likely therefore than none are and religion is merely a vehicle.

Now you have. Nice to meet you. I'm sure there are many of us out there. Many non religious students even study Theology, weird eh.?

I don't necessarily see good and bad in every religion per se. Although looking at some of it through modern westernised eyes. It is enough to raise an eyebrow or two but that is why I have spoken about moderation so much in previous posts.

Obviously those who take religion to the extreme and use it to hurt others should be dealt with swiftly. I do see this as vital for human cohesion in the future.

I am yet to meet a single fanatical religious person from any faith in all my years on earth. I wouldn't mix with somebody who would deliberately go out of their way to offend somebody for their beliefs. Or use their beliefs as a reason to hurt others (the extremists). Freedom of speech is essential to a free and democratic society. I would just hope we could show some restraint and not lampoon others just because it is legal to do so.

Do you now admit I said "I wasn't aware of any definitive evidence, that is universally accepted, of somebody being born gay?." I never once said it was somebody's choice to be gay?.

I guess you must do as you have failed to show me where I have said otherwise (even though you accused me of this on more than one occasion.)
 
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?
 
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?
Not really filmed on a mobile check footage from WW! and WW2 of men shot blood doesn't always spurt every where, what would be the point in faking it,I for one wouldn't fancy putting this theory to the officers nearest and dearest.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?

Sky news was reported saying blood has been put there <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20</a>
what i dont understand is after the lies you have been sponken though i really appreciate how people in uk stood up against the war in iraq ,why do you continue to belive everything which main stream media says,why cant you just may be think on the other lines,people ignore the fact that "who benifits from it ? " even if you disregard that,why not just think there is something more to it
 
Citizen in Pakistan said:
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?

Sky news was reported saying blood has been put there <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20</a>
what i dont understand is after the lies you have been sponken though i really appreciate how people in uk stood up against the war in iraq ,why do you continue to belive everything which main stream media says,why cant you just may be think on the other lines,people ignore the fact that "who benifits from it ? " even if you disregard that,why not just think there is something more to it
Are you saying that the French cop didn't die but was spirited away?
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?

Sky news was reported saying blood has been put there <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20</a>
what i dont understand is after the lies you have been sponken though i really appreciate how people in uk stood up against the war in iraq ,why do you continue to belive everything which main stream media says,why cant you just may be think on the other lines,people ignore the fact that "who benifits from it ? " even if you disregard that,why not just think there is something more to it
Are you saying that the French cop didn't die but was spirited away?

Sponken away. Don't be thick.
 
It appears to me that the final shot missed. Now I think of myself if I was the policeman, do I continue to move or try my best to play dead? Possibly he decided to stay still but ultimately died from blood loss from the earlier shots that hit him to the body.
 
TangerineSteve17 said:
It appears to me that the final shot missed. Now I think of myself if I was the policeman, do I continue to move or try my best to play dead? Possibly he decided to stay still but ultimately died from blood loss from the earlier shots that hit him to the body.
Maybe he did but he was still murdered, nevertheless.
 
ArdwickBlue said:
johnmc said:
ArdwickBlue said:
That's a shame, I was willing to join in. ;-o

I edited my post above, no swerve intended.

Fair play. I've never known anyone who has such a keen interest in religion without themselves being religious. So, on a serious note, you must see good and bad in every religion and given you are interested in all religions you must know that given all the different theories they all can't be correct and likely therefore than none are and religion is merely a vehicle.

Now you have. Nice to meet you. I'm sure there are many of us out there. Many non religious students even study Theology, weird eh.?

I don't necessarily see good and bad in every religion per se. Although looking at some of it through modern westernised eyes. It is enough to raise an eyebrow or two but that is why I have spoken about moderation so much in previous posts.

Obviously those who take religion to the extreme and use it to hurt others should be dealt with swiftly. I do see this as vital for human cohesion in the future.

I am yet to meet a single fanatical religious person from any faith in all my years on earth. I wouldn't mix with somebody who would deliberately go out of their way to offend somebody for their beliefs. Or use their beliefs as a reason to hurt others (the extremists). Freedom of speech is essential to a free and democratic society. I would just hope we could show some restraint and not lampoon others just because it is legal to do so.

Do you now admit I said "I wasn't aware of any definitive evidence, that is universally accepted, of somebody being born gay?." I never once said it was somebody's choice to be gay?.

I guess you must do as you have failed to show me where I have said otherwise (even though you accused me of this on more than one occasion.)

Nice to meet you too. In my eyes, the very sentence "I'm not aware of any definitive evidence" is the same as saying you are unsure and you couldn't commit either way. Again in my eyes, this notion is ludicrous. The very fact that many people have hidden their homosexuality out of shame shows its not a choice people make freely. But that's my opinion and we will leave that there if you want with specific regard to that subject.

Connected but not on the exact sanme topic is you not committing to your own view as there is the absence of studies and a universally accepted view. I find that comment from a religious student like yourself fairly strange. Is there a universally accepted view with regards religion. Are any of the mainstream religions bourne out of absolute fact?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.