Shootings in Paris

west didsblue said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
Wibble.

False flags my arse fella.

In the same way you urge us all to start to understand the issues surrounding this one big mess, you do the same and acknowledge you have some fucking idiots going around murdering innocent people all over the world in the so called name of your prophet!

He has many times on this very thread.

yea mate may be the only people who speak the truth in this world are the likes of bush , blair , nethanyahou etc and channels like fox cnn etc as per the terrorist they are as much muslim as much as i am a christian , jew or an atheist , you know how i can say that because i know the teachings of islam, For crtics of islam i think the history of islamic history begain post 9/11 ,Here is a bit of an insight.

<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age_of_Jewish_culture_in_Spain" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age ... e_in_Spain</a>
The golden age of Jewish culture in Spain coincided with the Middle Ages in Europe, a period of Muslim rule throughout much of the Iberian Peninsula. During intermittent periods of time, Jews were generally accepted in society and Jewish religious, cultural, and economic life blossomed[/b].

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/spain_1.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions ... in_1.shtml</a>

Islamic Spain (711-1492)

Islamic Spain was a multi-cultural mix of Muslims, Christians and Jews. It brought a degree of civilization to Europe that matched the heights of the Roman Empire and the Italian Renaissance. (so much for a religion of hate )

<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in ... amic_world</a>
Scientists within the Muslim ruled areas were of diverse ethnicities. Many were Persians,[2][3][4][5] others were Arabs, Assyrians and Kurds.[4] and Egyptians. They were also from diverse religious backgrounds. Most were Muslims,[6][7][8] but there were also some Christians,[9] Jews[9][10] and irreligious.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/feb/01/islamic-science" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010 ... ic-science</a>
What is only now becoming clear (to many in the west) is that during the dark ages of medieval Europe, incredible scientific advances were made in the Muslim world.What the medieval scientists of the Muslim world articulated so brilliantly is that science is universal, the common language of the human race.(so much of a 1400 year old backward religion)

if your more interested watch this bbc documentary for a good viewing <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL41gX0fJng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL41gX0fJng</a>
you would be surprised .


not even a one reply so far on the above content by people who are always looking to bash islam unless you deny the above as well,anyhow the point i do wana make is , isis ,al qaeda boko horam ,etc are not islam or anywhere close to islam,i can say this because i am a follower of islam,how could people consider it a part of islam when you dont know islam?how could you judge something when you dont know something ? would you like your lives to be judged by a person who doesnt know about you or your values?it would be cynical to say the least

Here is an article to give you some more insight

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comment/history-tells-us-that-europe-and-islam-can-coexist" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comme ... an-coexist</a>
In the aftermath of the Paris attacks, western observers have had harsh words to say about European Muslim communities. Ann Coulter, the right-wing pundit declared on Fox News that, maybe, it was a time for a “pause in Muslim immigration” to Europe. Pegida, a German group, has intensified its campaign against what is sees as the “Islamisation” of Germany. Meanwhile, Panorama, the UK current affairs programme, recently aired a show titled The Battle for British Islam. Everywhere, it seems, the question of how Islam and Europe can coexist is being raised.

A few years ago, I published a book called The ‘Other’ Europeans: Muslims of Europe. It took several years to write, but it only scratches the surface of the Muslim European story. It’s commonplace to talk about the input of Muslim Spain to European history. There is much to teach about that period, not least the contribution of Spanish and Portuguese Muslims to Europe’s Renaissance.

But there is far more Muslim influence to see in European history. While some politicians have been keen to define contemporary European society as rooted in only a Judeo-Christian framework, even the most cursory reviews of history would disavow that perception.

In southern Europe, Muslim Spain is well known, but Muslim Sicily is not. It was ruled by Muslim leaders for more than 150 years, beginning in the 9th century.

Roger I conquered Sicily at the end of the 11th century, and unlike other parts of Europe, where the Christian Reconquista meant an end to the existence of Muslim communities (and often Jews as well), Roger and his successor, Roger II, continued to rule over Muslim communities for many decades.

In northern and eastern Europe, Muslim communities have existed for centuries. The Tatar communities of Lithuania, for example, date back to at least the 14th century, when the Lithuanian Duke Witold took many Tatars as prisoner. Even after these Lithuanian Tatars lost their language, Islam continued to be a force of unity for them, through to the present day.

In Poland, there were many more Muslims – a 1631 census listed more than 100,000.

More than a century later, many of their ancestors swore on the Quran to fight for Polish independence in 1795, and opposed the Russians in 1830 and 1863 during the uprisings – a history that earned them respect and a favoured place in the country.

No historical overview of Muslims in Europe would be complete without considering the long period of Ottoman administration in the south-east of Europe. But there are other, less well-recorded chapters of history as well.

Take the UK, where the historical links are extensive. Records indicate that the king of England in the 13th century had considerable contact with the Sharif of Morocco – with some reports that at one point, he wrote to the Sharif discussing marriage with his daughter.

Another historian notes that for his role in the Magna Carta rebellion, an Englishman who is recorded as “Master de London” was banished. When he returned to Europe, he had converted to Islam, and was instrumental in spreading his new-found faith on the continent.

Even during the 19th and 20th centuries, many well-known converts to Islam can be found in the UK. The most famous of these in the Victorian era was Abdullah Quilliam, who was even recognised by the then Ottoman Sultan. Quilliam was quintessentially English, as were the members of the community of believers he led. There were others still, such as Murad Rais, formerly Peter Lyle, an Admiral in Nelson’s fleet in the 19th century. There is scarcely a country in Europe today that does not have such individuals in its history books, if one looks deep enough.

The same remains in contemporary history. Yusuf Islam, the musician formerly known as Cat Stevens, converted in the 1980s. Lord Stanley of Alderly, Lord Headley, Lord Khalida Hamilton-Buchanan – those are just a few of the members of the House of Lords in the UK who converted to Islam.

Director of Research at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, Bruno Guiderdoni, is another noted Muslim on the continent, as is the famed Cambridge University lecturer, Timothy Winter, recognised throughout the Muslim world for his wisdom.

The temptation is strong, particularly after a tragedy such as the Charlie Hebdo attack, to recreate our realities as so separate, between Muslim and non-Muslim, the West and Muslim communities. But that’s simply not historically accurate.

There is a long and vibrant history that is dynamic and very real, that shows these communities were – and are – intertwined.

When the likes of right-wing Dutch politician Geert Wilders, for example, says he wants “less Islam” in Europe, he is denying his own heritage and history. For, indeed, without Islam, writing our history as Europeans would be very difficult indeed.

Dr HA Hellyer is an associate fellow of the Royal United Services Institute in London, and the Centre for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC


Wibble

Not sure what wibble means. I'm guessing it means this post does not fit in with my one eyed narrative and agenda therefore i'll make a stupid comment and ignore it.
 
Citizen in Pakistan said:
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?

Sky news was reported saying blood has been put there <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20</a>
what i dont understand is after the lies you have been sponken though i really appreciate how people in uk stood up against the war in iraq ,why do you continue to belive everything which main stream media says,why cant you just may be think on the other lines,people ignore the fact that "who benifits from it ? " even if you disregard that,why not just think there is something more to it

The reporter in the vid is quite right, the blood must have been put there. It certainly wasn't there when the body was removed.
B6vyXlTCQAI5cQ-.jpg:large
I'd love to hear an explanation for it.
 
kinkladz-ade said:
There were two muslim heros in all this too. One of the police officers who was shot dead and this chap who saved lives in the jewish supermarket:

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/15/paris-supermarket-hero-to-be-given-citizenship-5023892/

This was posted earlier but worth a read if you missed it last time.

At a time when it's too easy to stereotype and generalise I found these to be poignant quotes from a good human being:

‘I helped Jews. We’re all brothers,’

‘It’s not a question of Jews, Christians or Muslims. We’re all in the same boat.’

Well done Lassana.

It was also refreshing to see the French people had petitioned to allow him to receive French citizenship in recognition for his bravery. At a time where I'm sure the Muslim community could be viewed as public enemy no. 1 by some people, I'm comforted to know there are reasonable human beings who are not tarring all Muslims with the same brush. Even in France where this all happened.
 
ArdwickBlue said:
kinkladz-ade said:
There were two muslim heros in all this too. One of the police officers who was shot dead and this chap who saved lives in the jewish supermarket:

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/15/paris-supermarket-hero-to-be-given-citizenship-5023892/

This was posted earlier but worth a read if you missed it last time.

At a time when it's too easy to stereotype and generalise I found these to be poignant quotes from a good human being:

‘I helped Jews. We’re all brothers,’

‘It’s not a question of Jews, Christians or Muslims. We’re all in the same boat.’

Well done Lassana.

It was also refreshing to see the French people had petitioned to allow him to receive French citizenship in recognition for his bravery. At a time where I'm sure the Muslim community could be viewed as public enemy no. 1 by some people, I'm comforted to know there are reasonable human beings who are not tarring all Muslims with the same brush. Even in France where this all happened.

obviously not all muslims are the enemy and I don't think anyone is saying that they are despite all the protestations on here which imply that they are

but murdering extremist islamist jihadist scum,(and those that support them) obviously are the enemy in what is clearly a war without borders

unless of course you are on the other side of the fence and consider it OK to murder innocent civilians because of nasty cartoons and your so called prophets apparently incredibly thin skin

scum like that probably felt that Lee Rigby 'got what was coming to him' as well and that innocent people deserved to die on 9/11 and 7/7 etc etc etc etc etc etc etc......
 
Balti said:
ArdwickBlue said:
kinkladz-ade said:
There were two muslim heros in all this too. One of the police officers who was shot dead and this chap who saved lives in the jewish supermarket:

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/15/paris-supermarket-hero-to-be-given-citizenship-5023892/

This was posted earlier but worth a read if you missed it last time.

At a time when it's too easy to stereotype and generalise I found these to be poignant quotes from a good human being:

‘I helped Jews. We’re all brothers,’

‘It’s not a question of Jews, Christians or Muslims. We’re all in the same boat.’

Well done Lassana.

It was also refreshing to see the French people had petitioned to allow him to receive French citizenship in recognition for his bravery. At a time where I'm sure the Muslim community could be viewed as public enemy no. 1 by some people, I'm comforted to know there are reasonable human beings who are not tarring all Muslims with the same brush. Even in France where this all happened.

obviously not all muslims are the enemy and I don't think anyone is saying that they are despite all the protestations on here which imply that they are

but murdering extremist islamist jihadist scum,(and those that support them) obviously are the enemy in what is clearly a war without borders

unless of course you are on the other side of the fence and consider it OK to murder innocent civilians because of nasty cartoons and your so called prophets apparently incredibly thin skin

scum like that probably felt that Lee Rigby 'got what was coming to him' as well and that innocent people deserved to die on 9/11 and 7/7 etc etc etc etc etc etc etc......

You may not have heard but I have stated several times on this thread,

I am not religious.


I am struggling to understand why you would comment on a nice post about a nice news story which offers a certain level of perspective on what's been discussed on here and turn it in to another negative rant about Islam as a whole?.

Maybe you should click on the link and read the article (again if you've already read it) as it would seem it's message has been lost on you somewhat.

2 billion people were not guilty of 9/11, 7/7, the murder of Lee Rigby or what happened in Paris.

Unfortunately bloodthirsty men have always hidden behind religion to justify atrocities against others right throughout human history.

If they didn't use religion as an excuse to wage war they would find something else to justify it, let's say weapons of mass destruction for example. This is how secular countries often find themselves waging war quite happily despite the omission of religion being present.
 
foxy said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
BlueHammer85 said:
I hate the usual conspiracy theories after every major news story. But this one is bugging me a little ...
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-uncensored-footage-paris-terror-attack-raises-serious-questions/200732/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-unce ... ns/200732/</a>

Why is there no blood at all ? I get it's not Hollywood, but even if the bullet hit him elsewhere the footage would show blood ?

Sky news was reported saying blood has been put there <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3v8pqosC20</a>
what i dont understand is after the lies you have been sponken though i really appreciate how people in uk stood up against the war in iraq ,why do you continue to belive everything which main stream media says,why cant you just may be think on the other lines,people ignore the fact that "who benifits from it ? " even if you disregard that,why not just think there is something more to it

Blood or no blood he was still fucked murdered by fucking cowards
Exactly. What the fuck is all this nonsense about whether there is any blood or not? It seems the false flag fanatics are determined to believe none of this ever happened, no cartoonists murdered, no policemen murdered, no car chases, no Jewish folk slaughtered, it all must be a figment of our collective imaginations.
 
ArdwickBlue said:
I am struggling to understand why you would comment on a nice post about a nice news story which offers a certain level of perspective on what's been discussed on here and turn it in to another negative rant about Islam as a whole?.

I'm not. He's not the only one on this forum who has an incredibly obvious and thinly veiled hatred that has been exposed in this thread.

Ancient Citizen said:
Exactly. What the fuck is all this nonsense about whether there is any blood or not? It seems the false flag fanatics are determined to believe none of this ever happened, no cartoonists murdered, no policemen murdered, no car chases, no Jewish folk slaughtered, it all must be a figment of our collective imaginations.

You haven't watched the video. He was absolutely not shot in the head during that time. You can see it miss him.

This isn't about whether it was a false flag or not it is about whether he was shot in the head on a piece of footage and he was absolutely not shot in the head on that footage. What happened otherwise from this is irrelevant to the larger discussion. You can ignore the commentary from around it if you want, and just view the footage.

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEvlKKm6og[/video]

Any person who has been anywhere near an AK-47 knows the power it has and at that range there is no chance at all that his head is even going to be in one piece. I'm reminded of an interesting article by Clarkson where he had the chance to shoot one and said he was shocked by the power of it and that he took a railway sleeper in half with it from 15m away.

Again, I'm not interested in the furore surrounding it and more that the media who claimed that that was the moment he was shot in the head are absolutely wrong.
 
Citizen in Pakistan said:
Citizen in Pakistan said:
Wibble.

False flags my arse fella.

In the same way you urge us all to start to understand the issues surrounding this one big mess, you do the same and acknowledge you have some fucking idiots going around murdering innocent people all over the world in the so called name of your prophet!

He has many times on this very thread.

yea mate may be the only people who speak the truth in this world are the likes of bush , blair , nethanyahou etc and channels like fox cnn etc as per the terrorist they are as much muslim as much as i am a christian , jew or an atheist , you know how i can say that because i know the teachings of islam, For crtics of islam i think the history of islamic history begain post 9/11 ,Here is a bit of an insight.

<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age_of_Jewish_culture_in_Spain" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age ... e_in_Spain</a>
The golden age of Jewish culture in Spain coincided with the Middle Ages in Europe, a period of Muslim rule throughout much of the Iberian Peninsula. During intermittent periods of time, Jews were generally accepted in society and Jewish religious, cultural, and economic life blossomed[/b].

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/spain_1.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions ... in_1.shtml</a>

Islamic Spain (711-1492)

Islamic Spain was a multi-cultural mix of Muslims, Christians and Jews. It brought a degree of civilization to Europe that matched the heights of the Roman Empire and the Italian Renaissance. (so much for a religion of hate )

<a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in ... amic_world</a>
Scientists within the Muslim ruled areas were of diverse ethnicities. Many were Persians,[2][3][4][5] others were Arabs, Assyrians and Kurds.[4] and Egyptians. They were also from diverse religious backgrounds. Most were Muslims,[6][7][8] but there were also some Christians,[9] Jews[9][10] and irreligious.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/feb/01/islamic-science" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010 ... ic-science</a>
What is only now becoming clear (to many in the west) is that during the dark ages of medieval Europe, incredible scientific advances were made in the Muslim world.What the medieval scientists of the Muslim world articulated so brilliantly is that science is universal, the common language of the human race.(so much of a 1400 year old backward religion)

if your more interested watch this bbc documentary for a good viewing <a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL41gX0fJng" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL41gX0fJng</a>
you would be surprised .[/quote]


not even a one reply so far on the above content by people who are always looking to bash islam unless you deny the above as well,anyhow the point i do wana make is , isis ,al qaeda boko horam ,etc are not islam or anywhere close to islam,i can say this because i am a follower of islam,how could people consider it a part of islam when you dont know islam?how could you judge something when you dont know something ? would you like your lives to be judged by a person who doesnt know about you or your values?it would be cynical to say the least

Here is an article to give you some more insight

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comment/history-tells-us-that-europe-and-islam-can-coexist" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/comme ... an-coexist</a>
In the aftermath of the Paris attacks, western observers have had harsh words to say about European Muslim communities. Ann Coulter, the right-wing pundit declared on Fox News that, maybe, it was a time for a “pause in Muslim immigration” to Europe. Pegida, a German group, has intensified its campaign against what is sees as the “Islamisation” of Germany. Meanwhile, Panorama, the UK current affairs programme, recently aired a show titled The Battle for British Islam. Everywhere, it seems, the question of how Islam and Europe can coexist is being raised.

A few years ago, I published a book called The ‘Other’ Europeans: Muslims of Europe. It took several years to write, but it only scratches the surface of the Muslim European story. It’s commonplace to talk about the input of Muslim Spain to European history. There is much to teach about that period, not least the contribution of Spanish and Portuguese Muslims to Europe’s Renaissance.

But there is far more Muslim influence to see in European history. While some politicians have been keen to define contemporary European society as rooted in only a Judeo-Christian framework, even the most cursory reviews of history would disavow that perception.

In southern Europe, Muslim Spain is well known, but Muslim Sicily is not. It was ruled by Muslim leaders for more than 150 years, beginning in the 9th century.

Roger I conquered Sicily at the end of the 11th century, and unlike other parts of Europe, where the Christian Reconquista meant an end to the existence of Muslim communities (and often Jews as well), Roger and his successor, Roger II, continued to rule over Muslim communities for many decades.

In northern and eastern Europe, Muslim communities have existed for centuries. The Tatar communities of Lithuania, for example, date back to at least the 14th century, when the Lithuanian Duke Witold took many Tatars as prisoner. Even after these Lithuanian Tatars lost their language, Islam continued to be a force of unity for them, through to the present day.

In Poland, there were many more Muslims – a 1631 census listed more than 100,000.

More than a century later, many of their ancestors swore on the Quran to fight for Polish independence in 1795, and opposed the Russians in 1830 and 1863 during the uprisings – a history that earned them respect and a favoured place in the country.

No historical overview of Muslims in Europe would be complete without considering the long period of Ottoman administration in the south-east of Europe. But there are other, less well-recorded chapters of history as well.

Take the UK, where the historical links are extensive. Records indicate that the king of England in the 13th century had considerable contact with the Sharif of Morocco – with some reports that at one point, he wrote to the Sharif discussing marriage with his daughter.

Another historian notes that for his role in the Magna Carta rebellion, an Englishman who is recorded as “Master de London” was banished. When he returned to Europe, he had converted to Islam, and was instrumental in spreading his new-found faith on the continent.

Even during the 19th and 20th centuries, many well-known converts to Islam can be found in the UK. The most famous of these in the Victorian era was Abdullah Quilliam, who was even recognised by the then Ottoman Sultan. Quilliam was quintessentially English, as were the members of the community of believers he led. There were others still, such as Murad Rais, formerly Peter Lyle, an Admiral in Nelson’s fleet in the 19th century. There is scarcely a country in Europe today that does not have such individuals in its history books, if one looks deep enough.

The same remains in contemporary history. Yusuf Islam, the musician formerly known as Cat Stevens, converted in the 1980s. Lord Stanley of Alderly, Lord Headley, Lord Khalida Hamilton-Buchanan – those are just a few of the members of the House of Lords in the UK who converted to Islam.

Director of Research at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, Bruno Guiderdoni, is another noted Muslim on the continent, as is the famed Cambridge University lecturer, Timothy Winter, recognised throughout the Muslim world for his wisdom.

The temptation is strong, particularly after a tragedy such as the Charlie Hebdo attack, to recreate our realities as so separate, between Muslim and non-Muslim, the West and Muslim communities. But that’s simply not historically accurate.

There is a long and vibrant history that is dynamic and very real, that shows these communities were – and are – intertwined.

When the likes of right-wing Dutch politician Geert Wilders, for example, says he wants “less Islam” in Europe, he is denying his own heritage and history. For, indeed, without Islam, writing our history as Europeans would be very difficult indeed.

Dr HA Hellyer is an associate fellow of the Royal United Services Institute in London, and the Centre for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC[/quote]

lol
 
Damocles said:
ArdwickBlue said:
I am struggling to understand why you would comment on a nice post about a nice news story which offers a certain level of perspective on what's been discussed on here and turn it in to another negative rant about Islam as a whole?.

I'm not. He's not the only one on this forum who has an incredibly obvious and thinly veiled hatred that has been exposed in this thread.

Ancient Citizen said:
Exactly. What the fuck is all this nonsense about whether there is any blood or not? It seems the false flag fanatics are determined to believe none of this ever happened, no cartoonists murdered, no policemen murdered, no car chases, no Jewish folk slaughtered, it all must be a figment of our collective imaginations.

You haven't watched the video. He was absolutely not shot in the head during that time. You can see it miss him.

This isn't about whether it was a false flag or not it is about whether he was shot in the head on a piece of footage and he was absolutely not shot in the head on that footage. What happened otherwise from this is irrelevant to the larger discussion. You can ignore the commentary from around it if you want, and just view the footage.

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEvlKKm6og[/video]

Any person who has been anywhere near an AK-47 knows the power it has and at that range there is no chance at all that his head is even going to be in one piece. I'm reminded of an interesting article by Clarkson where he had the chance to shoot one and said he was shocked by the power of it and that he took a railway sleeper in half with it from 15m away.

Again, I'm not interested in the furore surrounding it and more that the media who claimed that that was the moment he was shot in the head are absolutely wrong.
Ok, fine, it does indeed look like the shot missed, maybe it did. So, the fine details of how the poor bloke was murdered have been unfortunately misconstrued. Does it matter? At first glance everyone would think the same, but he's probably been killed by the original shots he took. Again, what is the point being made, did this maniac in black not kill him at all, or is there are suggestion that it's all staged?
 
Ancient Citizen said:
Ok, fine, it does indeed look like the shot missed, maybe it did. So, the fine details of how the poor bloke was murdered have been unfortunately misconstrued. Does it matter? At first glance everyone would think the same, but he's probably been killed by the original shots he took. Again, what is the point being made, did this maniac in black not kill him at all, or is there are suggestion that it's all staged?

I have no idea because I tend not to delve into such nonsense. The guy has a family who no longer have a Dad and that's the important bit in my mind.

We cheapen skepticism when we dismiss reality because we think it lends credence to a story that is nonsense. We can see from that that unless the laws of physics changed for a moment in a small part of Paris, he wasn't killed at that exact moment by a shot to the head. We cannot say that they didn't come back to him, nor that he had a heart attack or the shot traveled through his chest cavity or anything else.

People can have a point on one thing without their whole argument being true. I don't subscribe to the false flag attack and understand that in chaotic events like this, 9/11 and other attacks, the media rush to get information out often results in things that are false being reported. That seems a simpler explanation to me than some mass global conspiracy performed by "the Jews" or some other shadowy figure. Occam's Razor applies as always.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.