Should Lescott get a new contract?

blueparrot said:
It might make sense for us , but think Lescott deserves better than being 3rd choice when he could get regular football at a few premier clubs, and possibly still get in an England squad.

You get the impression he wants to stay from the comments he's made recently. If he chose to stay this season, which is a world cup year, then I'm sure if we offered him a year extension he'd take it in a heartbeat even if it meant knowing he'd be 3rd choice ...
 
BillyShears said:
blueparrot said:
It might make sense for us , but think Lescott deserves better than being 3rd choice when he could get regular football at a few premier clubs, and possibly still get in an England squad.

You get the impression he wants to stay from the comments he's made recently. If he chose to stay this season, which is a world cup year, then I'm sure if we offered him a year extension he'd take it in a heartbeat even if it meant knowing he'd be 3rd choice ...

Yeah suppose the choice is his, he knows the options.
 
Yes for me . Can still do a job as third or 4th choice .
I am still not convinced he is not Vinny's best partner at the moment.
Remember De Jong and who we got to replace him.
Obviously on less wages though.
 
Rolee said:
whp.blue said:
Not for me

he seems to be the only player in the current squad who looks uncomfortable on the ball

he is an accident waiting to happen ie his trip/slip on the half way line against Hull (which luckily he got away with) his assist for cisse against QPR

nasty is already a better left sided centre half and he is still learning his trade we should be able to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

-- Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:22 pm --

Not for me

he seems to be the only player in the current squad who looks uncomfortable on the ball

he is an accident waiting to happen ie his trip on the half way line against Hull (which luckily he got away with) his assist for cisse against QPR

nasty is already a better left sided centre half and he is still learning his trade we should be able to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

Did Sparkless decide the wages too? Jaysus the Taffia really did have some control over things didn't they?

If we can negotiate his wage down then I'd give him a year extension.

well he did more or less wages are linked into the size of the transfer fee and Hughes was desperate to sign Lescott and neverton had Citys pants down whilst backing their Manager

-- Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:30 pm --

Rolee said:
whp.blue said:
Not for me

to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

-- Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:22 pm --<br /><br />-- Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:32 pm --<br /><br />
Rolee said:
Did Sparkless decide the wages too? Jaysus the Taffia really did have some control over things didn't they?

If we can negotiate his wage down then I'd give him a year extension.

well he did more or less wages are linked into the size of the transfer fee and Hughes was desperate to sign Lescott and neverton had Citys pants down whilst backing their Manager
 
whp.blue said:
Rolee said:
whp.blue said:
Not for me

he seems to be the only player in the current squad who looks uncomfortable on the ball

he is an accident waiting to happen ie his trip/slip on the half way line against Hull (which luckily he got away with) his assist for cisse against QPR

nasty is already a better left sided centre half and he is still learning his trade we should be able to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

-- Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:22 pm --

Not for me

he seems to be the only player in the current squad who looks uncomfortable on the ball

he is an accident waiting to happen ie his trip on the half way line against Hull (which luckily he got away with) his assist for cisse against QPR

nasty is already a better left sided centre half and he is still learning his trade we should be able to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

Did Sparkless decide the wages too? Jaysus the Taffia really did have some control over things didn't they?

If we can negotiate his wage down then I'd give him a year extension.

well he did more or less wages are linked into the size of the transfer fee and Hughes was desperate to sign Lescott and neverton had Citys pants down whilst backing their Manager

-- Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:30 pm --

Rolee said:
whp.blue said:
Not for me

to do much much better than him for his stupid wages that idiot Hughes put him on

-- Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:22 pm --

-- Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:32 pm --

well he did more or less wages are linked into the size of the transfer fee and Hughes was desperate to sign Lescott and neverton had Citys pants down whilst backing their Manager
We paid more for Fernandinho and he is on about £80k a week
 
Joleon Lescott admits he could be nearing the end of his glittering Manchester City career.

Lescott’s £90,000-a-week contract at the Etihad ends in the summer and City have made no move to open talks over a new deal. Lescott turns 32 in August and the Blues are believed to be willing to release him and use the savings on his wages to fund the purchase of a new centre-half.

The defender, who has won the Premier League and FA Cup with City since his controversial £22million move from Everton 2009, is philosophical about the situation and knows he is playing for his future, even it it probably lies elsewhere.

“I want to stay,” he said. “That’s the main thing. But the club have not approached me yet, so I don’t know what the situation is with them.

“If I’m playing for my future here, then great. If I’m playing for it elsewhere, then so be it. I just know that every time I’m out there, I have to perform at a level where top clubs would be interested in signing me.”

Lescott was demoted by Matija Nastasic’s signing in 2012 and was irked by Roberto Mancini’s reluctance to play him alongside the Serb because they are both left-footed.

Mancini’s successor at the Etihad, Manuel Pellegrini also appears to have reservations about Lescott and he will only face Swansea on Saturday if Nastasic and Vincent Kompany are unavailable.

Lescott says he could even go in January and admits it has been hard spending much of the last 18 months on the sidelines.

“It depends on what the club wants and what opportunities there are for me in January,” he said.

“I’m not just going to leave a club like this for the sake of it, but at the end of the season I would have to.

“It’s hard not playing. No professional enjoys it and I’m no different. It’s not great not playing in the last year of my contract.”

Lescott feels he played well enough against Viktoria Plzen on Wednesday to keep his place and is frustrated that he is dropped regardless of his performance.

“I just want to be treated the same as everyone else,” he said. “So if I’m playing and the team is winning, then I stay in the team, the same as everyone else.

“Realistically, there is only one place up for grabs when Vinny is fit. There are three of us for fighting for that. But I’m ready for the challenge.

“I try not to doubt myself and I try to believe I can perform.”

Rio looks more than the 5,760 miles away than it is for Lescott, but he refuses to give up on his World Cup dream.

“It doesn’t look like I’ll be going at the minute,” he admitted. “I’ve not been in the last few squads, so it’s going to be hard.

“But if I’m playing for City and we’re progressing in the Champions League and the title race, then there might be a place for me.”


Check out all the latest News, Sport & Celeb gossip at Mirror.co.uk <a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/im-playing-future-admits-joleon-2865369#ixzz2m4ryGiMh" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... z2m4ryGiMh</a>
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook
 
He should, but not on that wage, when we bought the likes of Lescott, we had to pay top dollar to entice them, we no longer need to do that. In JL's case I'd try to keep him, but it would have to be on a sensible wage, which would still be higher than at most other clubs could offer. Its up to him whether he wants the money and potential medals, or regular first team football.
 
mcfc2607 said:
Not good enough sorry
definitely good enough to be a squad player, but on a max wage of about 35k a week and that's probably why the club aren't willing to get him to sign an extension he won't take a >50% paycut
 
No, he doesn't suit what we need anymore, and he deserves to go off to another club and make the most of the rest of his career.

If we can bring someone in in January and let him go so he can make a late charge at the World Cup squad then I say all good, because he deserves a good send off because he's more than played his part in our evolution.
 
I have a lot of time for Lescott. He's nowhere near as bad as a lot of people make out and despite his limitations, he is a very decent backup defender imo. The manager must think he's fucking awful though given the number of times he has picked Garcia in the back four ahead of him so it is probably in everybody's interest for him to move to a club where he'll get more games.
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
Nice fella, good stopper, limited footballing ability. Stays if he wants but at the wage we want to pay.

good way of putting it. I'm surprised he wants to stay though, its clear his best days at city are behind him
 
Lancet Fluke said:
The manager must think he's fucking awful though given the number of times he has picked Garcia in the back four ahead of him so it is probably in everybody's interest for him to move to a club where he'll get more games.
He picks Garcia because he can kick a ball with his right foot, which Lescott only uses for standing on. Lescott is fine anywhere on the left side, facing forwards, but he can only use the one foot, so put him on the wrong side, or the wrong foot, and he struggles badly.

Keep him for me, he's a decent left sided centre back (and good in the air), and could probably fill in at left back if we were desperate, but never use him on the right side of anything.
 
Played his part in winning the League but it is time to cash in unless he is willing to accept a squad role on reduced terms.
 
Yes he should. He knows the Premier League inside out. Decent enough cover when playing the likes of Stoke, Crystal Palace away or early cup rounds. I wouldn't have him as first choice but as a back up centre half definately yes. It would be difficult to find anyone better, with his experience who could either fit straight in when asked or would be happy as second choice.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top