SkyBlueCanuck
Well-Known Member
It all makes sense to me now... Sadio Mane was just trying to emulate the finishing move of famous LFC supporter Sheamus, "the brogue kick".
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sky - Mané Red card poll (official appeal rejected)
- Thread starter Cobwebcat
- Start date
jayfx
Well-Known Member
That makes sense then. I didn't know this but I have noticed how Sutton has nothing good to say and is often argumentative with other pundits. He's a horrible little man, I've no idea why they have him on.Sutton is bitter because he lost every single penny he ever earned in football gambling and was declared bankrupt 2014 , he's not just nasty to us , it's everybody and everything he is a bitter twisted f*cker , who has' nt got a good word to say about anyone , take his words with a pinch of salt.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
Just had this with a deluded, suicidal Dipper at work yesterday. 2 hours were lost after analysing slow motion Youtube footage & there was no chance of him moving his position.
Unbelievably, this fuckin clown reckons it was EDERSON who should have been sent off for recklessly charging out of his box & ENDANDERING Mane by going for a ball he had no right to go for!
The berk was saying everyone on whatever LFC fans forum he belongs to agrees with him! Really?
Mane looked at Ederson twice before studding him in the head which he only conceded after the 50th replay, but he STILL wouldn't concede that Mane's foot was raised! He claimed Ederson stooped his head down to knee height & that Mane's leg was barely above ankle height!
It even went as far as us getting the ruler out to measure the distance between Mane's head & the bottom of the advertising board seconds before the flying kick, & the elevated height of his head to above the advertising board just as kick landed.
He conceded Mane's head had 'moved up slightly', but refused to move from his position that EDERSON had stooped in a dangerously suicidal fashion which caused the 'accidental' clash.
Even after I said to him that we were a goal up & in the ascendency, he claimed LFC would have battered us 4-1 if not for the sending off! I just gave up after that one!
Unbelievably, this fuckin clown reckons it was EDERSON who should have been sent off for recklessly charging out of his box & ENDANDERING Mane by going for a ball he had no right to go for!
The berk was saying everyone on whatever LFC fans forum he belongs to agrees with him! Really?
Mane looked at Ederson twice before studding him in the head which he only conceded after the 50th replay, but he STILL wouldn't concede that Mane's foot was raised! He claimed Ederson stooped his head down to knee height & that Mane's leg was barely above ankle height!
It even went as far as us getting the ruler out to measure the distance between Mane's head & the bottom of the advertising board seconds before the flying kick, & the elevated height of his head to above the advertising board just as kick landed.
He conceded Mane's head had 'moved up slightly', but refused to move from his position that EDERSON had stooped in a dangerously suicidal fashion which caused the 'accidental' clash.
Even after I said to him that we were a goal up & in the ascendency, he claimed LFC would have battered us 4-1 if not for the sending off! I just gave up after that one!
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
There's no point in trying to engage with halfwits like that, mate. Remorselessly and contemptuously mocking them is a far better use of your time.Just had this with a deluded, suicidal Dipper at work yesterday. 2 hours were lost after analysing slow motion Youtube footage & there was no chance of him moving his position.
Unbelievably, this fuckin clown reckons it was EDERSON who should have been sent off for recklessly charging out of his box & ENDANDERING Mane by going for a ball he had no right to go for!
The berk was saying everyone on whatever LFC fans forum he belongs to agrees with him! Really?
Mane looked at Ederson twice before studding him in the head which he only conceded after the 50th replay, but he STILL wouldn't concede that Mane's foot was raised! He claimed Ederson stooped his head down to knee height & that Mane's leg was barely above ankle height!
It even went as far as us getting the ruler out to measure the distance between Mane's head & the bottom of the advertising board seconds before the flying kick, & the elevated height of his head to above the advertising board just as kick landed.
He conceded Mane's head had 'moved up slightly', but refused to move from his position that EDERSON had stooped in a dangerously suicidal fashion which caused the 'accidental' clash.
Even after I said to him that we were a goal up & in the ascendency, he claimed LFC would have battered us 4-1 if not for the sending off! I just gave up after that one!
mrtwiceaseason
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 7,685
The dippers at work thought it was the city players surrounding the ref that had got him sent off !
bluetonium
Well-Known Member
Wow, they're actually appealing it? Hope he gets an extra ban for a frivolous appeal then. If the FA even entertain that idea then I've completely lost all faith in them as a governing body.
Glad ederson is able to train now, hopefully a few bin dippers will see the pictures of his injuries and accept the decision with grace.
I can only imagine the high pitched squeals of injustice should this have been Aguero on mignolet. They've have wanted him publically executed. #prayformane & #justiceformane'sboot
Glad ederson is able to train now, hopefully a few bin dippers will see the pictures of his injuries and accept the decision with grace.
I can only imagine the high pitched squeals of injustice should this have been Aguero on mignolet. They've have wanted him publically executed. #prayformane & #justiceformane'sboot
J
The berk was saying everyone on whatever LFC fans forum he belongs to agrees with him! Really?
i had a quick look on RAWK and tbh a good chunk of them said red card, more than i was expecting given we all put on our tinted glasses in these instances.
abu13
Well-Known Member
I for one am glad they are appealing the ban, it shows how deluded they really are. It also allows us the chance to see how the FA react.