so this agenda thing.

[cookster]

I'd advise any non-agenderist to check out Andy Dunn's shocking reporting in the Sunday Mirror today.

Im someone who sits on the fence on the agenda issue yet I found it eye-brow-raising to say the least.

here it is without needing to click on their odious site

Arsenal's Manchester City draw saw Wilshere go from Jack the Lad to Jack the Man
Sep 13, 2014 17:37
BY ANDYDUNN

The injury-plagued midfielder's epic display against the champions deserved much more than a point and made you wish he'll stay fit from now on, writes Andy Dunn

Jack Wilshere’s epic performance in Saturday's 2-2 draw with champions Manchester City deserved much, much better than an honourable draw. You could argue this compelling match showed why the Gunners will not win another title under Arsene Wenger - his lack of defensive organisation badly exposed by the Martin Demichelis equaliser.

Demichelis rescued a point in North London for City

For City, you could say this showed how difficult it will be to retain the title - when Manuel Pellegrini starts whining and moaning about refereeing decisions, you know he is rattled.

You could certainly note the absence of Yaya Toure and realise how crucial he is to this team’s fortunes - his replacement Frank Lampard had possibly the most forgettable 45 minutes of his wonderful career.
Forgettable: Lampard was wholly ineffective on his City debut
You could even sound an alarm bell over Joe Hart’s contribution - as well-worked as it was, Wilshere’s goalscoring task was made more comfortable by his England and Las Vegas mate.

But the wake of this edgy, classy, muscly fight is not the place for inquests. Both these heavyweights should take the positives from this pulse-quickening contest.
Which is why Pellegrini’s post-match shredding of Mark Clattenburg’s credentials was, actually, quite pathetic.
Pellegrini refused to talk about individuals in his squad... but was happy to pour scorn on Clattenburg.
Every decision in a match of this nature can be crucial and Clattenburg got most right and a few wrong.

Arsenal 2-2 Manchester City in pictures:

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Hart dropped to ground too early for Wilshere’s chip?

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Alexis Sanchez was left unmarked for his blinding volley?

NO and NO.

How far do you go back in a move to find culpability for a goal? If Clattenburg made errors, they were more than compounded by City players.
We expect classier from Pellegrini and I suspect he will regret his rantings in the morning.
Anyway, Wenger thought City were guilty of systematic fouling. So, there you go.....(followed by more of the nauseating eulogy about the Hertfordshire Hobbit)

His beloved Dippers got beat yesterday at home AGAIN by Villa. Plus he's still bitter from last season.

Not arsed what Dunce writes.

 

[The perfect fumble]

Would the Man on the Clapham Omnibus be offended if a national newspaper said he was gaga?

I give up mate. You're right, the Star clearly has an agenda against city, pellegrini and OAP's.

i see the david icke of the forum is looking for conspiracy crumbs again

You mean Clattenburg is a member of the Lizard Illuminati ?

 

[bernabias home shirt]

I'd advise any non-agenderist to check out Andy Dunn's shocking reporting in the Sunday Mirror today.

Im someone who sits on the fence on the agenda issue yet I found it eye-brow-raising to say the least.

here it is without needing to click on their odious site

Arsenal's Manchester City draw saw Wilshere go from Jack the Lad to Jack the Man
Sep 13, 2014 17:37
BY ANDYDUNN

The injury-plagued midfielder's epic display against the champions deserved much more than a point and made you wish he'll stay fit from now on, writes Andy Dunn

Jack Wilshere’s epic performance in Saturday's 2-2 draw with champions Manchester City deserved much, much better than an honourable draw. You could argue this compelling match showed why the Gunners will not win another title under Arsene Wenger - his lack of defensive organisation badly exposed by the Martin Demichelis equaliser.

Demichelis rescued a point in North London for City

For City, you could say this showed how difficult it will be to retain the title - when Manuel Pellegrini starts whining and moaning about refereeing decisions, you know he is rattled.

You could certainly note the absence of Yaya Toure and realise how crucial he is to this team’s fortunes - his replacement Frank Lampard had possibly the most forgettable 45 minutes of his wonderful career.
Forgettable: Lampard was wholly ineffective on his City debut
You could even sound an alarm bell over Joe Hart’s contribution - as well-worked as it was, Wilshere’s goalscoring task was made more comfortable by his England and Las Vegas mate.

But the wake of this edgy, classy, muscly fight is not the place for inquests. Both these heavyweights should take the positives from this pulse-quickening contest.
Which is why Pellegrini’s post-match shredding of Mark Clattenburg’s credentials was, actually, quite pathetic.
Pellegrini refused to talk about individuals in his squad... but was happy to pour scorn on Clattenburg.
Every decision in a match of this nature can be crucial and Clattenburg got most right and a few wrong.

Arsenal 2-2 Manchester City in pictures:

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Hart dropped to ground too early for Wilshere’s chip?

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Alexis Sanchez was left unmarked for his blinding volley?

NO and NO.

How far do you go back in a move to find culpability for a goal? If Clattenburg made errors, they were more than compounded by City players.
We expect classier from Pellegrini and I suspect he will regret his rantings in the morning.
Anyway, Wenger thought City were guilty of systematic fouling. So, there you go.....(followed by more of the nauseating eulogy about the Hertfordshire Hobbit)

His beloved Dippers got beat yesterday at home AGAIN by Villa. Plus he's still bitter from last season.

Not arsed what Dunce writes.

Isnt he an everton fan?
Tbh watching him on the sunday supplement he fights our corner a quite a bit

 

[nmc]

I'd advise any non-agenderist to check out Andy Dunn's shocking reporting in the Sunday Mirror today.

Im someone who sits on the fence on the agenda issue yet I found it eye-brow-raising to say the least.

here it is without needing to click on their odious site

Arsenal's Manchester City draw saw Wilshere go from Jack the Lad to Jack the Man
Sep 13, 2014 17:37
BY ANDYDUNN

The injury-plagued midfielder's epic display against the champions deserved much more than a point and made you wish he'll stay fit from now on, writes Andy Dunn

Jack Wilshere’s epic performance in Saturday's 2-2 draw with champions Manchester City deserved much, much better than an honourable draw. You could argue this compelling match showed why the Gunners will not win another title under Arsene Wenger - his lack of defensive organisation badly exposed by the Martin Demichelis equaliser.

Demichelis rescued a point in North London for City

For City, you could say this showed how difficult it will be to retain the title - when Manuel Pellegrini starts whining and moaning about refereeing decisions, you know he is rattled.

You could certainly note the absence of Yaya Toure and realise how crucial he is to this team’s fortunes - his replacement Frank Lampard had possibly the most forgettable 45 minutes of his wonderful career.
Forgettable: Lampard was wholly ineffective on his City debut
You could even sound an alarm bell over Joe Hart’s contribution - as well-worked as it was, Wilshere’s goalscoring task was made more comfortable by his England and Las Vegas mate.

But the wake of this edgy, classy, muscly fight is not the place for inquests. Both these heavyweights should take the positives from this pulse-quickening contest.
Which is why Pellegrini’s post-match shredding of Mark Clattenburg’s credentials was, actually, quite pathetic.
Pellegrini refused to talk about individuals in his squad... but was happy to pour scorn on Clattenburg.
Every decision in a match of this nature can be crucial and Clattenburg got most right and a few wrong.

Arsenal 2-2 Manchester City in pictures:

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Hart dropped to ground too early for Wilshere’s chip?

Was it Clattenburg’s fault Alexis Sanchez was left unmarked for his blinding volley?

NO and NO.

How far do you go back in a move to find culpability for a goal? If Clattenburg made errors, they were more than compounded by City players.
We expect classier from Pellegrini and I suspect he will regret his rantings in the morning.
Anyway, Wenger thought City were guilty of systematic fouling. So, there you go.....(followed by more of the nauseating eulogy about the Hertfordshire Hobbit)

Jack the Man hey. Old enough to buy his own drugs to fuel his (alleged) habit now is he. If Jack Wilshire is the great hope of English football - god help us.

 

[Bill]

clattenburg is a cheat. he didn't have a "bad day at the office", he had a very good day. his bosses will be pleased with him.

these bad days he has have been around an awful long time and appear far too often to be anything other than an ochestrated attack on our club.

 

[The perfect fumble]

clattenburg is a cheat. he didn't have a "bad day at the office", he had a very good day. his bosses will be pleased with him.

these bad days he has have been around an awful long time and appear far too often to be anything other than an ochestrated attack on our club.

I'm reluctantly coming round to thinking the same thing, when the same behaviour towards City is seen time and again, then there's a pattern.

 

[City Glory While Others Fade]

clattenburg is a cheat. he didn't have a "bad day at the office", he had a very good day. his bosses will be pleased with him.

these bad days he has have been around an awful long time and appear far too often to be anything other than an ochestrated attack on our club.

I'm reluctantly coming round to thinking the same thing, when the same behaviour towards City is seen time and again, then there's a pattern.

Pattern ? Go on say Agenda....it's therapeutic to get it off yer chest and leave the deluded behind ya!

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

clattenburg is a cheat. he didn't have a "bad day at the office", he had a very good day. his bosses will be pleased with him.

these bad days he has have been around an awful long time and appear far too often to be anything other than an ochestrated attack on our club.

I'm reluctantly coming round to thinking the same thing, when the same behaviour towards City is seen time and again, then there's a pattern.

Yesterday.
Anfield last season - 2 blatant penalties & bottling the Suarez sending off.
Stoke the season before - the Peter Crouch basketball moves when he scored.
Chelsea & the swamp in 2011/12 - Trip on Silva not given in the first and the Anderson barge on Richards in the second.
The Bellamy incident at Bolton.

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Trousering the best part of 200 million quid is hardly being "fucked off".

I'd fuck off from Bluemoon for half that figure if you want to organise a whip round.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Trousering the best part of 200 million quid is hardly being "fucked off".

I'd fuck off from Bluemoon for half that figure if you want to organise a whip round.

I'm going to organise nasty demos on the forum so you fuck off for nothing.

I'm a veteran of the Swales era.