so this agenda thing.

[Bodicoteblue]

It's a bit odd though.
When the GPC had a rant about a ref and his decisions it was seen as valid because , well, it was about the rags and it was obvious that the great man had a point , and , lo and behold those mistakes were never made again.
When the Portugese rodent has a gripe about a ref , it's all seen as a it of fun- Jose being Jose and all that, after all he is a constant source of rent-a-gob quotes which are lapped up by his sycophantic little lap dogs in the press. Wasn't that hilarious yesterday when he held on to the ball and hid it behind his back and wouldn't give it to the Swansea player to take a throw? I nearly wet myself!
As for Cretinburg, to have one bad day at the office can be seen as unfortunate , to have two can be seen as coincidence, but to have as many as he has must be seen as something a little more suspicious.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Interesting.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Trousering the best part of 200 million quid is hardly being "fucked off".

I'd fuck off from Bluemoon for half that figure if you want to organise a whip round.

It was after the sale, when he still had his 10% and honorary presidency and ADUG took those off him in Feb 2009. At that point, Clattenburg was suspended and sacked but was reinstated a few weeks after that.

 

[The perfect fumble]

clattenburg is a cheat. he didn't have a "bad day at the office", he had a very good day. his bosses will be pleased with him.

these bad days he has have been around an awful long time and appear far too often to be anything other than an ochestrated attack on our club.

I'm reluctantly coming round to thinking the same thing, when the same behaviour towards City is seen time and again, then there's a pattern.

Pattern ? Go on say Agenda....it's therapeutic to get it off yer chest and leave the deluded behind ya!

Pattern and agenda are different, in life many people are lazy bigots, they hold views that they never think through, in football, attitudes towards clubs may be less significant in the scheme of things, but they're there nonetheless, sloppy and ill defined perhaps, even sub-conscious, but they manifest themselves in the media and in the behaviour of match officials.

 

[Deleted member 58678]

As United and QPR walk out for their game Martin Tyler says; "well one way to deal with your problems is to throw money at them, and after their most baron Premier League season last year, that's exactly what Manchester United have done"!

Haha get in there Tyler!

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Interesting.

His first game refereeing us after his comeback was the end of season 1-0 v Bolton, which was pretty uncontroversial. Then next season it was the 4-2 against Arsenal, when he amended his report so that Adebayor could be retrospectively charged for his celebration, plus he claimed he didn't see the Adebayor kick on van Persie, even though he was looking straight at it at the time. Then it was the Bellamy game at Bolton.

2010/11 he also denied us a late penalty in a 1-1 home draw with Blackburn then sent off Boyata in the first few minutes of the game against Arsenal when we lost 3-0.

 

[bernabias home shirt]

As United and QPR walk out for their game Martin Tyler says; "well one way to deal with your problems is to throw money at them, and after their most baron Premier League season last year, that's exactly what Manchester United have done"!

Haha get in there Tyler!

Good little dig there from the arsenal fan

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

He's had it in for us since we fucked off Thaksin Shinawatra. You work out why that is.

Interesting.

His first game refereeing us after his comeback was the end of season 1-0 v Bolton, which was pretty uncontroversial. Then next season it was the 4-2 against Arsenal, when he amended his report so that Adebayor could be retrospectively charged for his celebration, plus he claimed he didn't see the Adebayor kick on van Persie, even though he was looking straight at it at the time. Then it was the Bellamy game at Bolton.

2010/11 he also denied us a late penalty in a 1-1 home draw with Blackburn then sent off Boyata in the first few minutes of the game against Arsenal when we lost 3-0.

But what does Shinawatra have to do with Clattenburg? Were they mates?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Interesting.

His first game refereeing us after his comeback was the end of season 1-0 v Bolton, which was pretty uncontroversial. Then next season it was the 4-2 against Arsenal, when he amended his report so that Adebayor could be retrospectively charged for his celebration, plus he claimed he didn't see the Adebayor kick on van Persie, even though he was looking straight at it at the time. Then it was the Bellamy game at Bolton.

2010/11 he also denied us a late penalty in a 1-1 home draw with Blackburn then sent off Boyata in the first few minutes of the game against Arsenal when we lost 3-0.

But what does Shinawatra have to do with Clattenburg? Were they mates?

Allegedly.

 

[Pam]

His first game refereeing us after his comeback was the end of season 1-0 v Bolton, which was pretty uncontroversial. Then next season it was the 4-2 against Arsenal, when he amended his report so that Adebayor could be retrospectively charged for his celebration, plus he claimed he didn't see the Adebayor kick on van Persie, even though he was looking straight at it at the time. Then it was the Bellamy game at Bolton.

2010/11 he also denied us a late penalty in a 1-1 home draw with Blackburn then sent off Boyata in the first few minutes of the game against Arsenal when we lost 3-0.

But what does Shinawatra have to do with Clattenburg? Were they mates?

Allegedly.

This does not surprise.