so this agenda thing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
karen7 said:
Some so called expert on talksport talking about top 4 reckons" city will be on the slide this coming season",i waited for the reason,none given

they are simply feeding the plastic rags bollocks. and they fall for it like the daft cunts they are.
 
Rob Shepherd wrote this today:

For the good of the England team is to be hoped Ross Barkley ignores the word that Manchester City want to sign him.
If the whispers that City are prepared to pay big money and mega wages to lure the 20-year-old midfielder from Everton prove true, it could be hard for Barkley and even his club to resist.
But while such a move would make him masses of money, what would his career end up being like?
As it stands Barkley is on the threshold of become a top, top player, perhaps even a great one.
Even if he was promoted to early for England this summer he showed flashes of what he might do
But he needs to develop and that only comes with, well, games.
At Everton he will start every big match. If he stays at the club for at least another two years then by the 2016 European Championship, at the age of 22, he could emerge as an international star. And remember Paul Gascoigne , a player who in some ways Barkley resembles, was 23 when made such an impact at Italia 90.
But if he was to move to City he could get swallowed up by their squad and ruined by team rotation.
Take Jack Rodwell, Joleon Lescott and Adam Johnson. Had all three continued on their previous career paths rather than chased City’s cash then could have been integral parts of England’s World Cup campaign and the team may well have been a lot stronger for their presence.
James Milner did make, but his sporadic appearances with City have affected him as an England player.
Understandably there is a time when a player feels he should cash in and move to a one of the big clubs that promise Champions League football.

Yes, Rooney made the leap at a young age and thrived. But he was an exception although some will say that now, at 28 when he should be at his peak, the mental and physical pressure he has been under since that move have taken their toll.
Besides, Barkley is already very well rewarded given how much more money clubs such as Everton can now pay, compared with when Rooney broke through .
His career not cash should be Barkley’s priority at the moment if he wants to mature into the world-class player he can be.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2698402/Edinson-Cavani-replace-Wayne-Rooney-Manchester-United-Football-Grapevine.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... evine.html</a>
 
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.
mancini ruined him ? or he was not as good as we thought he was,did Chelsea ruin him? did west brom ruin him,maybe,just maybe,he thought he made it,didnt have to work as hard "now he was a top pro at a top club" and ruined himself
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.

yeh would be a disaster for him. just like aj gaz baz and lescott who all left with prem winners medals.
 
sir peace frog said:
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.
mancini ruined him ? or he was not as good as we thought he was,did Chelsea ruin him? did west brom ruin him,maybe,just maybe,he thought he made it,didnt have to work as hard "now he was a top pro at a top club" and ruined himself
It's not Sinclair's fault he signed for us. He had the chance to prove himself in the top 4 and the Champions' League - who could say no to that forever? He was a promising winger doing quite well in the Premier League at a decent level. We signed him, and I think he could have done a job for us, but Mancini didn't trust him and allowed him to lose fitness.

Barkley will only join us when Yaya either leaves or retires, he's good to stay at Everton until then. He's a young lad working under a technically driven manager. Let's just hope the press stop comparing him to players of the past. It's happened with Lennon, Bentley, Parker, Welbeck, Wilshere, and all the other promising youngsters who've amounted to nothing. Allow him to progress quietly and he could be special.

Joining City isn't progressing quietly, it's jumping the gun. He'll be fine at Everton for another year or two, by which time he'll be worth about £35m and ready to take over from Yaya.
 
de niro said:
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.

yeh would be a disaster for him. just like aj gaz baz and lescott who all left with prem winners medals.
See that post just above that I've made, just explaining myself a little more.

I agree with you - I think it's ridiculous that it's taken Adam Johnson this long to realise his best years were at City. But what if England is more important to Barkley than his club career? If he leaves Everton at all before 2016 it'll be a bad move for him regardless of where he goes, as far as I'm concerned,
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.
There is no way on god's earth that such an article would be written at this stage in connection with a mooted move to united.
it would be the exact opposite

it would be how yoonited develop young english players from shitty little clubs and turn them into superstars

just like jones and smalling
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
He's not exactly wrong in saying that moving to us would be a bad move for him right now.

But Lescott and Milner were first choice until this season just gone. Rodwell was never fit.

Sinclair we can have no excuse for. Mancini ruined him.
if you really believe this then we should knock down the much vaunted academy and sell off all the kids as no-one will ever make it at City from the ranks by your reckoning
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.