Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
sir baconface said:de niro said:sir baconface said:There is a difference between "agenda" and "bias". In simple terms an agenda is more deliberate and coordinated.
Most posters agree there is a pro-rag/dipper bias. A major factor seems to be the number of hacks and pundits growing up in an era when those two were the most successful clubs.
I still believe City get less favourable treatment because of the noticeable "establishment" bias rather than any concerted campaign against us.
Things shift. Last year saw one or two journos emboldened as the Moyes comedy unfurled and the Piss Can could no longer threaten fatwa. They dared to query some of the club's strategic decisions and omissions. Then they flipped into "Giggs is a god" and "Van Gaal is the messiah" mode. So far only a blip then but the long term trend is clear. In ten years time we will be part of the establishment and one of two of the current members will be moaning about an agenda against them.
ffp is not bias. its a full blown agenda.
I was referring to the so-called media agenda. Re FFP, we are in agreement. Up against a cartel of vested interests there and there is most definitely collusion.
The likes of Twatini and the 'regulars' in the CL pot shareout will have been more than concerned at the influx of 'foreign' money going into teams that traditionally have not been 'regulars'! Clubs like MANUre and Bavarian MANUre will have been frightened to death that their days in the CL will be in jeopardy (MANUre can withstand ONE season out?) and that Uefa will be no more than a sideshow pulling microwaved balls out of a pot in order to maintain as much of the status quo as they can!