so this agenda thing.

[bernabias home shirt]

With respect, on the Stoke goal, Dinho got his body shape all wrong and Hart fucked up; both things being far more significant than avoiding fouling.

The way that we try to defend and Pellers demands for his team to be aggressive are bound to lead to a certain amount of fouls that could be avoided if we sat off our opponents more. I prefer us to be aggressive but I do think we give too many stupid free kicks away.

As to Mike Dean, he had a poor game on Sunday. Zab's sending off was a joke: one can debate the validity of the second booking but the first was unmerited because Hazard clearly runs into Zab. Quire how Costa's foul on Dzeko in their box went unpunished is beyond me. However, Dean is usually a good ref for us.

Clattenberg was the bent one last week, however I'd just prefer to label him as shit, just as his performance at Leicester this weekend was. Again however, as is par for the course, Clattenberg was not bent this weekend, and got the decisions correct.

The "YCNMIU" acronym does wind me up, however its rather apt here.

Find someone who seriously believes Clattenburg got the decisions against the rags correct. They were shocking. There's plenty of incompetent refs. He's not one of them. Bent as fuck. Not in an agenda/anti city way but in a far east bookie way. We used to get excellent results when he reffed our games when a certain former prime minister was our owner. He's literally been suspended from refereeing before.

Walton, Mason and Taylor are the others I wouldn't want anywhere near a City game. City have successfully had Mason pulled from games before but he seems to be back now which is pretty irritating. Walton was quietly retired and I find it bizarre that people from Greater Manchester can ref games for either side, even if you're not a fan of either City or United you're likely to have strong feelings towards one or both of them.

The Far East bookie bullshit again
Where the fuck do you get this shit from?

 

[Exeter Blue I am here]

With respect, on the Stoke goal, Dinho got his body shape all wrong and Hart fucked up; both things being far more significant than avoiding fouling.

The way that we try to defend and Pellers demands for his team to be aggressive are bound to lead to a certain amount of fouls that could be avoided if we sat off our opponents more. I prefer us to be aggressive but I do think we give too many stupid free kicks away.

As to Mike Dean, he had a poor game on Sunday. Zab's sending off was a joke: one can debate the validity of the second booking but the first was unmerited because Hazard clearly runs into Zab. Quire how Costa's foul on Dzeko in their box went unpunished is beyond me. However, Dean is usually a good ref for us.

Clattenberg was the bent one last week, however I'd just prefer to label him as shit, just as his performance at Leicester this weekend was. Again however, as is par for the course, Clattenberg was not bent this weekend, and got the decisions correct.

The "YCNMIU" acronym does wind me up, however its rather apt here.

Find someone who seriously believes Clattenburg got the decisions against the rags correct. They were shocking. There's plenty of incompetent refs. He's not one of them. Bent as fuck. Not in an agenda/anti city way but in a far east bookie way. We used to get excellent results when he reffed our games when a certain former prime minister was our owner. He's literally been suspended from refereeing before.

Walton, Mason and Taylor are the others I wouldn't want anywhere near a City game. City have successfully had Mason pulled from games before but he seems to be back now which is pretty irritating. Walton was quietly retired and I find it bizarre that people from Greater Manchester can ref games for either side, even if you're not a fan of either City or United you're likely to have strong feelings towards one or both of them.

In the case of Mason and Taylor they do......both for United. Unfortunately they seem to have been allowed to pass themselves off as Bolton and Altrincham fans respectively as far as the FA is concerned

 

[without a dream]

Clattenberg was the bent one last week, however I'd just prefer to label him as shit, just as his performance at Leicester this weekend was. Again however, as is par for the course, Clattenberg was not bent this weekend, and got the decisions correct.

The "YCNMIU" acronym does wind me up, however its rather apt here.

Find someone who seriously believes Clattenburg got the decisions against the rags correct. They were shocking. There's plenty of incompetent refs. He's not one of them. Bent as fuck. Not in an agenda/anti city way but in a far east bookie way. We used to get excellent results when he reffed our games when a certain former prime minister was our owner. He's literally been suspended from refereeing before.

Walton, Mason and Taylor are the others I wouldn't want anywhere near a City game. City have successfully had Mason pulled from games before but he seems to be back now which is pretty irritating. Walton was quietly retired and I find it bizarre that people from Greater Manchester can ref games for either side, even if you're not a fan of either City or United you're likely to have strong feelings towards one or both of them.

The Far East bookie bullshit again
Where the fuck do you get this shit from?

A series of one sided refereeing performances leading to unusual scorelines. A previous suspension from refereeing. Always surprises me that people seem to think that the Premier League is somehow immune from corruption.

 

[kt5blue]

The point I would make about clattenburg is that if you are declared bankrupt (which he has been) you are barred from many professions law, accountancy etc. The professional bodied responsible for these professions do this do their can be no suggestion of impropriety. If referees want to be treated professionally they should be subject to the same standards.

 

[Latics Fan SJK]

Find someone who seriously believes Clattenburg got the decisions against the rags correct. They were shocking. There's plenty of incompetent refs. He's not one of them. Bent as fuck. Not in an agenda/anti city way but in a far east bookie way. We used to get excellent results when he reffed our games when a certain former prime minister was our owner. He's literally been suspended from refereeing before.

Walton, Mason and Taylor are the others I wouldn't want anywhere near a City game. City have successfully had Mason pulled from games before but he seems to be back now which is pretty irritating. Walton was quietly retired and I find it bizarre that people from Greater Manchester can ref games for either side, even if you're not a fan of either City or United you're likely to have strong feelings towards one or both of them.

The Far East bookie bullshit again
Where the fuck do you get this shit from?

A series of one sided refereeing performances leading to unusual scorelines. A previous suspension from refereeing. Always surprises me that people seem to think that the Premier League is somehow immune from corruption.

And it always surprises me how many nutters believe the world are out to destroy big, bad Manchester City.

 

[without a dream]

The Far East bookie bullshit again
Where the fuck do you get this shit from?

A series of one sided refereeing performances leading to unusual scorelines. A previous suspension from refereeing. Always surprises me that people seem to think that the Premier League is somehow immune from corruption.

And it always surprises me how many nutters believe the world are out to destroy big, bad Manchester City.

I explicitly posted that I don't think that's the case.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

The Far East bookie bullshit again
Where the fuck do you get this shit from?

A series of one sided refereeing performances leading to unusual scorelines. A previous suspension from refereeing. Always surprises me that people seem to think that the Premier League is somehow immune from corruption.

And it always surprises me how many nutters believe the world are out to destroy big, bad Manchester City.

Why have you used the plural form here? There's only one world. Should be 'the world is'! It still surprises me how many folk have little grammar.

 

[squirtyflower]

A series of one sided refereeing performances leading to unusual scorelines. A previous suspension from refereeing. Always surprises me that people seem to think that the Premier League is somehow immune from corruption.

And it always surprises me how many nutters believe the world are out to destroy big, bad Manchester City.

I explicitly posted that I don't think that's the case.

he doesn't listen

it's easier to accuse everyone as being paranoid, even when you concede points that don't fit their narrative that you're a nutter
abuse is easier to deliver

 

[sir baconface]

And it always surprises me how many nutters believe the world are out to destroy big, bad Manchester City.

I explicitly posted that I don't think that's the case.

he doesn't listen

it's easier to accuse everyone as being paranoid, even when you concede points that don't fit their narrative that you're a nutter
abuse is easier to deliver

Paranoid or not, one or two posters have taken this to obsessive levels. It does grate after their umpteenth post alleging the same old same old.

Yes I know, I can stay off the thread but some bits are actually interesting.

 

[squirtyflower]

I explicitly posted that I don't think that's the case.

he doesn't listen

it's easier to accuse everyone as being paranoid, even when you concede points that don't fit their narrative that you're a nutter
abuse is easier to deliver

Paranoid or not, one or two posters have taken this to obsessive levels.

i wouldn't disagree with you, and healthy discussion is good, but when blues are coming on the thread just to take the piss out of fellow blues, it does become tiresome