so this agenda thing.

[Phil1]

While MOTD's analysis of our game is completely ignored we have people concentrating on all the shit in the media. Lawrenson and Jenas were very postive about us. Jenas said something like "Pellegrini's masterstroke tactics are what won City the game". Lawrenson said something like "City played like champions today and said to Southampton 'you think you're a good team, well we're a good team' and they are".


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/30/southampton-manchester-city-premier-league-match-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... tch-report</a>
"There was panache to the way the visitors responded to Mangala’s loss "

The coverage on MOTD 2 was fair, balanced and correct. Why on earth should anyone have a problem with it?

A problem? Are you that masochostic that you only look for problems?

If that's how you've read that then I'd say you're the one with problems.
Take a look at how many times I've posted in this thread, that should answer your question.

 

[Deleted member 58678]

While MOTD's analysis of our game is completely ignored we have people concentrating on all the shit in the media. Lawrenson and Jenas were very postive about us. Jenas said something like "Pellegrini's masterstroke tactics are what won City the game". Lawrenson said something like "City played like champions today and said to Southampton 'you think you're a good team, well we're a good team' and they are".


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/30/southampton-manchester-city-premier-league-match-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... tch-report</a>
"There was panache to the way the visitors responded to Mangala’s loss "

lol, piss funny when apologists ignore countless examples of bias and agenda only to then use 1 or 2 examples of (and i won't usee the word positive for CORECCTLY reviewing a match) fair reporting to try and back up their stance, piss funny.

Nope. I'm just pointing out that people are just purposely looking for negative things and skating over positives. I have time to give you one or two, if i had more time i'd give you countless. I'm just trying to cheer this miserable thread up. The thread title should be renamed "a masochist's paradise"!

 

[everythingchangesbutblue]

While MOTD's analysis of our game is completely ignored we have people concentrating on all the shit in the media. Lawrenson and Jenas were very postive about us. Jenas said something like "Pellegrini's masterstroke tactics are what won City the game". Lawrenson said something like "City played like champions today and said to Southampton 'you think you're a good team, well we're a good team' and they are".


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/30/southampton-manchester-city-premier-league-match-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... tch-report</a>
"There was panache to the way the visitors responded to Mangala’s loss "

lol, piss funny when apologists ignore countless examples of bias and agenda only to then use 1 or 2 examples of (and i won't usee the word positive for CORECCTLY reviewing a match) fair reporting to try and back up their stance, piss funny.

Nope. I'm just pointing out that people are just purposely looking for negative things and skating over positives. I have time to give you one or two, if i had more time i'd give you countless. I'm just trying to cheer this miserable thread up. The thread title should be renamed "a masochist's paradise"!

How many times can you just keep on insulting fellow blues? look for as many positives as you want they will be microscopic compared to the negative ones, but then again what does it matter you defended ex rags slaggin us off on national tv.

 

[Phil1]

While MOTD's analysis of our game is completely ignored we have people concentrating on all the shit in the media. Lawrenson and Jenas were very postive about us. Jenas said something like "Pellegrini's masterstroke tactics are what won City the game". Lawrenson said something like "City played like champions today and said to Southampton 'you think you're a good team, well we're a good team' and they are".


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/30/southampton-manchester-city-premier-league-match-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... tch-report</a>
"There was panache to the way the visitors responded to Mangala’s loss "

lol, piss funny when apologists ignore countless examples of bias and agenda only to then use 1 or 2 examples of (and i won't usee the word positive for CORECCTLY reviewing a match) fair reporting to try and back up their stance, piss funny.

Nope. I'm just pointing out that people are just purposely looking for negative things and skating over positives. I have time to give you one or two, if i had more time i'd give you countless. I'm just trying to cheer this miserable thread up. The thread title should be renamed "a masochist's paradise"!

But that's the point mate, it's not anything of the sort. There was a thread started about good articles concerning City, it must have gotten to about 5 pages at best. This one continues because on an often daily basis there's disparaging remarks made by various news outlets and media that Attempt to undo the great work our club is doing both on and off the pitch.

 

[silverback]

Oh give over, man!

If you fall for a known WUMs work, you're nothing but daft to do so!

So a wum can slag us off no end, say whatever they want to the masses but it does'nt matter because you know their a wum? that doesn't even make sense

Do you not remember when he said we were as good as Barcelona? How did you react to that? I took it with a pinch of salt because i thought he'd be trying to wind up UNITED fans, rather than actually meaning what he said.

Who?

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

While MOTD's analysis of our game is completely ignored we have people concentrating on all the shit in the media. Lawrenson and Jenas were very postive about us. Jenas said something like "Pellegrini's masterstroke tactics are what won City the game". Lawrenson said something like "City played like champions today and said to Southampton 'you think you're a good team, well we're a good team' and they are".


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/30/southampton-manchester-city-premier-league-match-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... tch-report</a>
"There was panache to the way the visitors responded to Mangala’s loss "

lol, piss funny when apologists ignore countless examples of bias and agenda only to then use 1 or 2 examples of (and i won't usee the word positive for CORECCTLY reviewing a match) fair reporting to try and back up their stance, piss funny.

Nope. I'm just pointing out that people are just purposely looking for negative things and skating over positives. I have time to give you one or two, if i had more time i'd give you countless. I'm just trying to cheer this miserable thread up. The thread title should be renamed "a masochist's paradise"![/quo

Why do you feel the need to have a dig at everyone who disagrees with you.
Some of the shit written about us over the last couple of weeks, has been way short of the truth.
So people comment on this, you drag up and article from the Domesday book and then start
calling people when they don't agree with you.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

lol, piss funny when apologists ignore countless examples of bias and agenda only to then use 1 or 2 examples of (and i won't usee the word positive for CORECCTLY reviewing a match) fair reporting to try and back up their stance, piss funny.

Nope. I'm just pointing out that people are just purposely looking for negative things and skating over positives. I have time to give you one or two, if i had more time i'd give you countless. I'm just trying to cheer this miserable thread up. The thread title should be renamed "a masochist's paradise"![/quo

Why do you feel the need to have a dig at everyone who disagrees with you.
Some of the shit written about us over the last couple of weeks, has been way short of the truth.
So people comment on this, you drag up and article from the Domesday book and then start
calling people when they don't agree with you.

Everyone expects criticism, that's the nature of sports journalism - I think that it's gone passed the valid criticism stage recently though. Writing whatever you want to appease fans from other clubs and attract readers/listeners/viewers, no matter how lacking in facts or logic the article is, isn't journalism.

 

[mat]

SSN report on Chelskis match tomorrow. Apparently they beat us this season thanks to a players team talk!

 

[Blue Mist]

It seems the agenda is working as we are now turning in on ourselves and attacking our own supporters. Oh how happy the media will be.

 

[oldius]

Meanwhile today's Telegraph reports that the United juggernaught is gaining momentum!