D
D
dronefromsector7g
Guest
Fuck agenda
Is there bias?
Is there bias?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
so this agenda thing.
- Thread starter Bill
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Bill
Moderator
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:So is there an agenda or not?
do you know of a religious man in the Vatican?
nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
de niro said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:So is there an agenda or not?
do you know of a religious man in the Vatican?
...well the agenda is as real as the God he prays to.
Len Rum
Well-Known Member
You have to decide based on the definition and the evidence.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:So is there an agenda or not?
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,331
Len Rum said:You have to decide based on the definition and the evidence.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:So is there an agenda or not?
This evening James Cooper was on SSN fondling the inside of Fletchers shirt were the LVG family motto 'Youth, Thrusting Loins and Greatness' had been stitched inside the collar. Cooper was visibly aroused by the homoerotic undercurrent of the situation and was eagerly doing the work demanded of him by his Dark Master Lorg Ven Gall.
A clear agenda? For me yes. My wife on the other hand just saw a pasty middle aged bloke squinting in the sun and babbling incoherent nonsense whilst pawing a shirt with his clammy hands. She just assumed he was suffering from heat stroke.
Who is correct? Well obviously my wife since that's the way we roll and I ain't stupid enough to say otherwise but in reality we are both correct. The agenda both exists and doesn't exist and can be in both states simultaneously until it is defined as being one or the other through interaction with an observer. It is Schrödinger's Agenda.
Bill
Moderator
even today the star reporting on the turtles view of man city.
its "big spending city" and " the billionaires". odd that both city AND utd have spent roughly the same since 2011. for that we have an fa cup, 2 titles and a league cup.
when Chelsea was discussed there was no money mentioned. not a single word.
its "big spending city" and " the billionaires". odd that both city AND utd have spent roughly the same since 2011. for that we have an fa cup, 2 titles and a league cup.
when Chelsea was discussed there was no money mentioned. not a single word.
This probably was posted at the time and maybe even this thread.
Anyway sky were showing highlights of the game at anfield last season in the build to up our friendly and it is remarkable the differing reactions when we both score.
Sounds like a little child at Christmas when they score and like he's just been told his wife's seeing his best mate when we do.
Either he got caught up in all the Liverpool love in last season or there's a bias there.
Anyway sky were showing highlights of the game at anfield last season in the build to up our friendly and it is remarkable the differing reactions when we both score.
Sounds like a little child at Christmas when they score and like he's just been told his wife's seeing his best mate when we do.
Either he got caught up in all the Liverpool love in last season or there's a bias there.
I thought when Chelsea got their second at Klanfield it sounded like someone had just died. Was one of the most exciting moments of the season. Definitely think some got carried away with the dippers last season, practically willing them to win the title.Claytop said:This probably was posted at the time and maybe even this thread.
Anyway sky were showing highlights of the game at anfield last season in the build to up our friendly and it is remarkable the differing reactions when we both score.
Sounds like a little child at Christmas when they score and like he's just been told his wife's seeing his best mate when we do.
Either he got caught up in all the Liverpool love in last season or there's a bias there.
Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,139
Of course there is an agenda, to suggest that UEFA, the FA and premier league have no kind of plan for the game is ludicrous in the extreme. The idea that the senior executives of major media outlets are not aware of what this future looks like is also naive. Do people really believe that the major kingmakers in the game leave things to chance? To suggest that those senior execs of major media outlets don't liaise with senior decision makers in the game, don't get a sense of the objectives of those governing bodies and don't pass their orders down the chain to be executed by the editors and journalists is naive. (How else do you think they ensure they retain important broadcasting contracts for example?) To suggest that the PR people at UEFA, the FA and premier league do not cajole and influence the media to put copy that helps with that 'plan' is naive. If this isn't possible, then please explain how Qatar won the decision to host the World Cup and yet there is still not one shred of 'written' evidence that the whole thing was fixed, despite the fact that we now look at the decision and realise how ludicrous it was and how it was virtually impossible (in my opinion) that they won it on merit. An agenda doesn't have to be written down for it to manifest itself and be executed on. It is done by influence, by stealth, by quid pro quo's, through PR, through key appointments of individuals that can be trusted to execute on the grand plan.
The agenda has been brought clear and out into the open by FFP, that agenda is to keep the traditional big clubs exactly where they are. We are the troublesome interloper who is interfering with that plan. David Gill gets appointed as the head of FFP panel and yet still people seem in denial that any agenda exists. Just what will it take ?
There is mountains and mountains of evidence that a concerted agenda to halt our progress exists. Now it seems that the media have taken an approach to simply 'ignore' our achievements. Make no mistake, the general public are hugely influenced by what they see and hear, if we get negative press then it makes our growth plans more difficult as promotion of the club is down to our own PR and marketing teams. Now that revenue is key to what you can spend, and what you can spend secures you the best players, make no mistake we need to grow the MCFC brand globally to remain competitive, particularly when we have to renew the squad as it gets older.
To ignore the glaringly obvious simply gives those who wish to put us back in our place the idea that they can carry on unhindered. City fans are right to expose this bias and the agenda whenever we see it. That is the only way anything will change.
The agenda has been brought clear and out into the open by FFP, that agenda is to keep the traditional big clubs exactly where they are. We are the troublesome interloper who is interfering with that plan. David Gill gets appointed as the head of FFP panel and yet still people seem in denial that any agenda exists. Just what will it take ?
There is mountains and mountains of evidence that a concerted agenda to halt our progress exists. Now it seems that the media have taken an approach to simply 'ignore' our achievements. Make no mistake, the general public are hugely influenced by what they see and hear, if we get negative press then it makes our growth plans more difficult as promotion of the club is down to our own PR and marketing teams. Now that revenue is key to what you can spend, and what you can spend secures you the best players, make no mistake we need to grow the MCFC brand globally to remain competitive, particularly when we have to renew the squad as it gets older.
To ignore the glaringly obvious simply gives those who wish to put us back in our place the idea that they can carry on unhindered. City fans are right to expose this bias and the agenda whenever we see it. That is the only way anything will change.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.