so this agenda thing.

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Star bar Monday?

Yeah baby. Before or after. Or both??

 

[Chris in London]

Star bar Monday?

Yeah baby. Before or after. Or both??

Before certainly, maybe after

Gtg

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Star bar Monday?

Yeah baby. Before or after. Or both??

Before certainly, maybe after

Gtg

It's a date.

 

[Bill]

Ffs.
Perry mason and Ironside all loved up.

 

[St Helens Blue (Exiled)]

Just listened to Manuels presser from yesterday.

Quite clearly the fucking rats were trying to get a line out of him regarding the dippers. He was very respectful towards them and just said he prefers his own squad yet todays headlines reckon he called them "bottlers".

Why the fuck don't the club take action against these fucking twats.
They will soon realise he is no Mancini and will never bring the club unwanted attention etc.

Fuck off media-Cunts

 

[waspish]

Just listened to Manuels presser from yesterday.

Quite clearly the fucking rats were trying to get a line out of him regarding the dippers. He was very respectful towards them and just said he prefers his own squad yet todays headlines reckon he called them "bottlers".

Why the fuck don't the club take action against these fucking twats.
They will soon realise he is no Mancini and will never bring the club unwanted attention etc.

Fuck off c**t

Yep and what's even more annoying is shitesports reading the paper "Headlines" and not the actual quotes from Pellegrini!! So now all the thick kunts who take slysports for fact believe it

 

[Inter Me Nan]

They are bottlers ha.

 

[Len Rum]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

 

[Pigeonho]

Just listened to Manuels presser from yesterday.

Quite clearly the fucking rats were trying to get a line out of him regarding the dippers. He was very respectful towards them and just said he prefers his own squad yet todays headlines reckon he called them "bottlers".

Why the fuck don't the club take action against these fucking twats.
They will soon realise he is no Mancini and will never bring the club unwanted attention etc.

Fuck off c**t

Yep and what's even more annoying is shitesports reading the paper "Headlines" and not the actual quotes from Pellegrini!! So now all the thick kunts who take slysports for fact believe it

Why would that bother you? If people aren't capable of making their own mind up on something, their opinion and beliefs aren't really worthy of anything. Besides, all clubs get that 'twist the words' treatment from the press. The twist grabs a punters attention, as is the name of the game. Someone with half a brain will look into such an article more in depth and then make their mind up. Others will read the headline and make their mind up instantly and incorrectly. Others just won't care. Either way though, none of it affects anything in the grand scheme of things. If Mr Smith over there in yonder wants to believe a headline, let him. Makes no difference to the fans of any particular club or of course the club itself. It's just the uneducated opinion of someone who doesn't matter.

 

[Le Havre Oswald]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

So if Chelsea win it having spent a shit load of money, that's fine then. Same with arsenal?

He's going to find it hard to find a team to win it which hasn't spent any money! Pompey maybe?

 

[Sky Blue]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

He's still not over the 10-1 the bandy legged fucker.......

 

[Len Rum]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

So if Chelsea win it having spent a shit load of money, that's fine then. Same with arsenal?

He's going to find it hard to find a team to win it which hasn't spent any money! Pompey maybe?

Agreed I just think his view is shared by many in the media.
Not an agenda, just individual pundits who don't want us to succeed which maybe accounts for much of the bad coverage we get in the media?
Other factors, apart from the money , could be lack of English players,managers,owners relative to our rivals.

 

[hertsblue]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

So if Chelsea win it having spent a shit load of money, that's fine then. Same with arsenal?

He's going to find it hard to find a team to win it which hasn't spent any money! Pompey maybe?

This
Just lazy lazy opinions. Ever since the PL every team that has won it has done it with money spent heavily. Of the top 4-5 we have probably spent the least net this season

 

[Newman Noggs]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

So if Chelsea win it having spent a shit load of money, that's fine then. Same with arsenal?

He's going to find it hard to find a team to win it which hasn't spent any money! Pompey maybe?

This
Just lazy lazy opinions. Ever since the PL every team that has won it has done it with money spent heavily. Of the top 4-5 we have probably spent the least net this season

I can't help feeling that there is an ingrained feudal psychology feeding this sort of attitude. They have bought into the idea, propagated by the media, that there are two or three "elite" clubs (plus Chelsea) who have an almost hereditary right to be at the top and to enjoy the privileges that entails including spending vast amounts of money, pontificating on how other clubs conduct themselves and generally looking down on everyone else. McDonald is an intellectual serf and those who share his views are doomed to be cap-doffing peasants forever. Good luck to them, we know different.

 

[George Hannah]

Anybody get Back Pass , the retro soccer mag.
Malcolm McDonald ( Supermac of Newcastle and Arsenal in the seventies) reviewing the current season:
'Who are your tip for the Premier League Title?'
'I know it is boring, but I will have to say Manchester City, though I hope they don't win it again because money will then be buying the title'.
Fair enough to Supermac for being honest.
IMO I think Supermac's opinion is shared by many other media pundits,journals,punters etc. i.e they simply don't want us to succeed because of the money.
It's not really an agenda , it could be bias although that is generally considered to be an unfair inclination so maybe much of the way we are reported on simply reflects the individual views of people working in the sports media?

I can't help feeling that there is an ingrained feudal psychology feeding this sort of attitude. They have bought into the idea, propagated by the media, that there are two or three "elite" clubs (plus Chelsea) who have an almost hereditary right to be at the top and to enjoy the privileges that entails including spending vast amounts of money, pontificating on how other clubs conduct themselves and generally looking down on everyone else. McDonald is an intellectual serf and those who share his views are doomed to be cap-doffing peasants forever. Good luck to them, we know different.

I thought he was called Ronald

 

[Deleted member 58678]

Driving home from town last night and saw BT Sport have yet another billboard ad that's negative towards Arsenal with a picture of them conceding against us with the caption "City 6 Arsenal 3" at the bottom.

Also the 50 Years of MOTD programme; the ONLY goal they spent a bit of time on was our Kun's 2012 title winner.

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

Driving home from town last night and saw BT Sport have yet another billboard ad that's negative towards Arsenal with a picture of them conceding against us with the caption "City 6 Arsenal 3" at the bottom.

Also the 50 Years of MOTD programme; the ONLY goal they spent a bit of time on was our Kun's 2012 title winner.

Don't think their is an Agenda, per se. But have to admit I read a lot of shit written and talked about us by the media.
There is always going to be examples like the above.

People like yourself that keep posting these arguments, seem to think that it, negates any other argument.
Just because we have a nice shiny advert showing us scoring, doesn't mean to say that everything else,
re City and the press doesn't exist.

 

[Len Rum]

Driving home from town last night and saw BT Sport have yet another billboard ad that's negative towards Arsenal with a picture of them conceding against us with the caption "City 6 Arsenal 3" at the bottom.

Also the 50 Years of MOTD programme; the ONLY goal they spent a bit of time on was our Kun's 2012 title winner.

Don't think their is an Agenda, per se. But have to admit I read a lot of shit written and talked about us by the media.
There is always going to be examples like the above.

People like yourself that keep posting these arguments, seem to think that it, negates any other argument.
Just because we have a nice shiny advert showing us scoring, doesn't mean to say that everything else,
re City and the press doesn't exist.

Agree with your last paragraph.
You say don't think 'there is an Agenda per se'.
This implies you think an agenda requires some kind of collaboration.
It doesn't.
Also there can be more than one and different types of agenda.
And there can be bias without agenda.

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

Driving home from town last night and saw BT Sport have yet another billboard ad that's negative towards Arsenal with a picture of them conceding against us with the caption "City 6 Arsenal 3" at the bottom.

Also the 50 Years of MOTD programme; the ONLY goal they spent a bit of time on was our Kun's 2012 title winner.

Don't think their is an Agenda, per se. But have to admit I read a lot of shit written and talked about us by the media.
There is always going to be examples like the above.

People like yourself that keep posting these arguments, seem to think that it, negates any other argument.
Just because we have a nice shiny advert showing us scoring, doesn't mean to say that everything else,
re City and the press doesn't exist.

Agree with your last paragraph.
You say don't think 'there is an Agenda per se'.
This implies you think an agenda requires some kind of collaboration.
It doesn't.
Also there can be more than one and different types of agenda.
And there can be bias without agenda.

Not getting into and argument with anybody about anything on here.
Just felt the need to reply as people keep posting supposed pro City stuff,
in response to any complaint of media BIAS.
Everything else has been done to death on here.

 

[Len Rum]

Don't think their is an Agenda, per se. But have to admit I read a lot of shit written and talked about us by the media.
There is always going to be examples like the above.

People like yourself that keep posting these arguments, seem to think that it, negates any other argument.
Just because we have a nice shiny advert showing us scoring, doesn't mean to say that everything else,
re City and the press doesn't exist.

Agree with your last paragraph.
You say don't think 'there is an Agenda per se'.
This implies you think an agenda requires some kind of collaboration.
It doesn't.
Also there can be more than one and different types of agenda.
And there can be bias without agenda.

Not getting into and argument with anybody about anything on here.
Just felt the need to reply as people keep posting supposed pro City stuff,
in response to any complaint of media BIAS.
Everything else has been done to death on here.

Fair play mate.
My point was - there isn't one overall master plan AGENDA in which the media organizations and the footballing authorities are all collaborating against City. There are different agendas involving different media groups ( all of which as you say have been done to death here ) and there are also many examples on the thread of bias without agenda.