so what do we do?

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Well done on Sinclair (or whoever you were referring to in your surprise, surprise post). If you wonder why the cynics are cynical, you need to take a good long look at yourself.

For what it is worth, TH, I didn't take part in anything yesterday evening and your flouncing was your own decision. I have also defended your right to post nonsense.

Finally, and whilst we're talking about 'wearing thin', I'm fairly chuffed that your PM strategy shift will lead to me never having to see another of your youtube links.

Even if you are BM's version of Jimmy Swaggart, I urge you to keep on preaching, man. Just don't get upset or flounce-off when some of us declare our atheism.

I honestly have no idea why you see me as a threat, but there you go.

Here is the entire issue laid bare. A rather self-satisfied, arrogant posting that you have me weighed, measured and wanting.

You have rocked up and decided in less than 100 posts to make assumptions way above your pay grade.

For you to be a threat, I would need to consider you an equal on the subject matter in hand.

The PM offer is a genuine one, one where I can regulate it, further. As for flouncing off, try reading my post, simply stating I would enjoy the rest of what Blue Moon has to offer.

As for Sinclair, I was able to pick up a telephone, which is more than most on here can.

Once again TH, read your own post.

You accuse me of being arrogant yet, later in your post, say that you do not consider me an equal on the subject matter in hand.

I would say that the lack of coming to fruition of your statements / clues from yesterday (and earlier in the transfer window) make us EXACTLY equals.

No idea what 100 posts or pay grade has to do with it either, to be honest (but, by the by, I think that I'd be at least equal to you there. Neither arrogance nor a source of argument, just a statement).

That's fair enough, in parts, reading it back.

With regards my 'statements' in this window, is it shut yet?

Depends what your definition of an 'ITK' is. Mine is being able to inform, update and use what I have at my disposal.

That puts me at a distinct advantange to most.

Repeatedly, I have people telling half-truths, make fake postings in my name, even state I have had a hand in someone losing their savings.

I don't see what people with sarcasm and agenda get out of it.

I get fuck all out of being on here, except negativity, which is draining.

PMs, if nothing else, will relegate the argument I desire a public audience.

I get that elsewhere.

 

[gouldybob]

Anybody got any transfer rumours?

 

[LongsightM13]

Why would I be interested in anything apart from the right to express my own opinion without being castigated ? Does there really have to be a wider view to it than that ?

I accept that there are those who choose to believe him on everything he posts.

I, however, do not. I ask you please to accept that.

Get over yourself, this is not about opinions.

-- Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:09 pm --

The length of time someone has been on here, or the number of posts they have, means bugger all to be honest.
There are people who have been on here for years and have thousands of posts who are clueless when it comes to transfers — or indeed, pretty much anything else.
And yes, I include myself in that.
I agree that people can buildup reputations over time, but that doesn't mean that someone with only 100 posts should be set upon for that reason alone.

PS Prestwich — please don't kick off the Mancini/Mourinho thing again!!! I think I would actually have to take a rope, go to the shed and kill myself if that particular Bluemoon civil war breaks out again

. <<<<<<<<< this is the point >>>>>>>>>>> this is how far you've missed it by

Don't think so. There has been plenty of slagging of newer/less frequent posters. Perhaps not by you but certainly by others.

 

[Trigger]

Maybe we should make the date joined and number of posts posted invisible.

It makes not one jot of difference when you joined or how many posts you have on how much knowledge you have or how much of a City fan you are!

 

[Magicpants]

I can't be arsed reading 22 pages but would it be correct to assume Tolmie has gone on a slapped arse again because somebody had the temerity to doubt his spurious and ridiculously vague "ITK" videos and now people have begun white-knighting for Tolmie and the ban threats have started?

Anyone care to give me a summary?

 

[lost_n_spaced]

******* Sorry off topic (cant create new thread) ****************

The moose on Talkshi*te reporting James Milner to Sunderland tomorrow..

Hope not...

As I stated a lot earlier in the thread.

Does this make us equals now, TH ?

 

[Soulboy]

I can't be arsed reading 22 pages but would it be correct to assume Tolmie has gone on a slapped arse again because somebody had the temerity to doubt his spurious and ridiculously vague "ITK" videos and now people have begun white-knighting for Tolmie and the ban threats have started?

Anyone care to give me a summary?

35 posts?

You're gonna get it mate! ;-))

 

[The Flash]

It's Stillsy's fault. He got everyone wound up with his Hotting Up thread so it was only a matter of time before it kicked off.

And whilst we haven't signed Sinclair, it's clear that we are interested and we have registered our intent, so fair play to Tolmie as no-one else knew at that point. So there's really no need for the beef as he was correct about the player, if a little off with the bid/fee.

An issue I do have with TH however, is the fact I had Cilla Black singing "Surprise, Surprise" in my head all fucking day yesterday. Bastard!

Not casting any aspersions here whatsoever, but the Sinclair link was in many of the Sunday papers and then Nixon of the Mirror tweeted and then wrote a story about it, all before Tolmie contributed to the thread. To say nobody knew is not correct

Either way, I'm not arsed.

But Cilla Black and her buck-tooth grid shouting Surprise Surprise at me all day is something I could have done without.

Although that may have more to do with how much my psyche hates me.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I can't be arsed reading 22 pages but would it be correct to assume Tolmie has gone on a slapped arse again because somebody had the temerity to doubt his spurious and ridiculously vague "ITK" videos and now people have begun white-knighting for Tolmie and the ban threats have started?

Anyone care to give me a summary?

Where's that facepalm picture?

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

I can't be arsed reading 22 pages but would it be correct to assume Tolmie has gone on a slapped arse again because somebody had the temerity to doubt his spurious and ridiculously vague "ITK" videos and now people have begun white-knighting for Tolmie and the ban threats have started?

Anyone care to give me a summary?

And picking on people with low post-counts. Watch out, here it comes....