My work group WhatsApp chat, which has 15 lads who support a range of clubs from Championship and PL, including Hull, Forest, Preston, Leeds, Liverpool etc. all posted in today that they wanted them to stay so it’s definitely not “every football fan”.Then I'd wonder what took my boss so long to sack my shite white ass.
Whilst being shite might be subjective, I think every football fan can agree that them 3 are, at best. very poor and at worst utterly abysmal. So their lack of ability isn't in question.
So if they replace a shite white pundit with a slightly less shite black pundit, do you think that's morally wrong or do you think 'well it's a slight upgrade'?
They wouldn’t have lasted so long if nobody liked them.
I think it all depends on the reasons why the Sky bosses have done it. If they, as I suspect, are thinking they need to bin all the middle aged white men to push diversity, then yes it’s deeply immoral and insulting to black people.
Open opportunities to all but base it on merit.