squirtyflower said:I have never abused ZZ, find him slightly interesting, but does he have to be so long winded about it all, spouting crap before getting to the info. I think its the way he gives the info that winds some up on here, unlike spursmad who tells it like he sees it. ZZ is the new Cantona when it comes to writng posts.
bluebean said:tommcfc said:Graceyboy said:And ur a f**kin arsehole
how do you like an unprovoked verbal lashin
either believe or not, dont abuse em if there info is wrong
whos the more foolish? the fool or the fool that follows?
its his opinion that ZZ is a twat. and its hardly unprovoked with the level of shit spouted by him.
so because he believes that ZZ 'spouts shit' he should abuse him when he doesnt even know the fella? yeah thats sounds great! if he doesnt agree or believe it, then he should just move on and ignore!
squirtyflower said:I have never abused ZZ, find him slightly interesting, but does he have to be so long winded about it all, spouting crap before getting to the info. I think its the way he gives the info that winds some up on here, unlike spursmad who tells it like he sees it. ZZ is the new Cantona when it comes to writng posts.
Numptyed said:Spursmad has your guy ever said anything about things off the pitch at City, ie stadium plans or alike?
Thanks for all the info over the last few week mate it's very much appreciated.
tommcfc said:bluebean said:tommcfc said:Graceyboy said:And ur a f**kin arsehole
how do you like an unprovoked verbal lashin
either believe or not, dont abuse em if there info is wrong
whos the more foolish? the fool or the fool that follows?
so because he believes that ZZ 'spouts shit' he should abuse him when he doesnt even know the fella? yeah thats sounds great! if he doesnt agree or believe it, then he should just move on and ignore!
but why get on his back too? its his opinion let him have it. if anyone was to respond it should be ZZ.
bluebean said:anyway! like i said before, SMILE, its good being blue and eto'o is 80% done!