Ethan23
Well-Known Member
it'll be bye bye mario as well
ethan23 said:it'll be bye bye mario as well
allan harper said:ethan23 said:it'll be bye bye mario as well
Every cloud......
franksinatra said:chesterbells said:franksinatra said:So the perception of the club doesn't matter? Most players praise Fergie so I suppose his behaviour is perfectly acceptable also?
The fact that you compare him to Manicin is laughable, a man who sneakily walks behind an opposition manger and pokes him in the eye. Is the person you want representing Manchester City?
I didnt support City on the basis to see silverware, I supported them due to family connections and the fact that they stood for something. If were prepared to sell our soul and hire him then its a very sad day for this club
Lets not get too high & mighty here; there have have been plenty of characters (on and off the field) in our clubs past who have not always behaved as they should. I don't see the point in trading individual incidents for 'morality' (poke in the eye vs cigar in the eye etc etc),
I also started supporting for family reasons, but What do you mean you supported the club cos they "stood for something" ? What, tell me, did city stand for exactly over and above every other football club. I'll go & get a hanky to wipe away the tear from my eye whilst you compose your reply.
No need for the hanky pal and you're correct we have had many an unsvaoury character in the past, but if we have a choice do we have to acquire an unsavoursy character again, does that justify doing it in the future.
We have a manager widely respected for his behaviour, his humility and who is proving successful. Why would you want to change that.
Yes City stood for something to me, they were the polar opposities of United a club steeped in arrogance, intimidating refs, divine right of the fans to win, belittling supporters of other clubs, it made my support for City to strengthen, along with the camaraderie of the fans.
I have waited along time for success for me personally it will be tainted if we show now humilty in victory. Hope your eyes are not too sore
-- Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:10 am --
franksinatra said:chesterbells said:Lets not get too high & mighty here; there have have been plenty of characters (on and off the field) in our clubs past who have not always behaved as they should. I don't see the point in trading individual incidents for 'morality' (poke in the eye vs cigar in the eye etc etc),
I also started supporting for family reasons, but What do you mean you supported the club cos they "stood for something" ? What, tell me, did city stand for exactly over and above every other football club. I'll go & get a hanky to wipe away the tear from my eye whilst you compose your reply.
No need for the hanky pal and you're correct we have had many an unsvaoury character in the past, but if we have a choice do we have to acquire an unsavoursy character again, does that justify doing it in the future.
We have a manager widely respected for his behaviour, his humility and who is proving successful. Why would you want to change that.
Yes City stood for something to me, they were the polar opposities of United a club steeped in arrogance, intimidating refs, divine right of the fans to win, belittling supporters of other clubs, it made my support for City to strengthen, along with the camaraderie of the fans.
I have waited along time for success for me personally it will be tainted if we show no humilty in victory. Hope your eyes are not too sore
sjk2008 said:Fotball fans are fickle.
When Mourinho comes and wins you a treble inside his first two seasons (including a league or two and at least a champions league final appearance) there wont be much hatred for him then, I'll be sure of that.