Spurs’ new stadium

Wembley is not in the sticks. Arguably easier to access/exit from than N17 which is a fucking mare if anyone’s been. 43k doesn’t sound bad but this is ‘top six spurs’ we’re talking about. 43k is a disgrace for such a ‘big’ club. Even lowly West Ham in their rented shit bowl eclipse that by miles.

Faiweather fucktards
 
Wembley is not in the sticks. Arguably easier to access/exit from than N17 which is a fucking mare if anyone’s been. 43k doesn’t sound bad but this is ‘top six spurs’ we’re talking about. 43k is a disgrace for such a ‘big’ club. Even lowly West Ham in their rented shit bowl eclipse that by miles.

Faiweather fucktards
Fuckers are third in my hatred list behind rags & dippers.....still not got over that fucking 81 cup final and the walk back to the train.

West Ham are a proper club just sadly without decent people in charge.
 
It's also worth remembering that under the Swales regime our attendances seemed to have been routinely under reported. My guess would be that we actually averaged over 20k in 87-88.
Under swales in the late 80s,on the kippax terrace,when thd crowd was announceded there was often open laughter and disbelief by a load of us...as in swales fiddling gates again
 
They look shocking on the face of it but relative to other clubs at the time and considering we spent 4 out of 10 seasons in the 2nd division during the 1980's, our crowds held up really well.

I don't have the exact figures to hand but as far as league games go, out of all the clubs in England we had the 3rd highest "lowest" league crowd during the 80's. Only United and Liverpool bettered us. United got 23k+ vs Wimbledon, and Liverpool 17k+ against someone who I can't remember. Our lowest league crowd that decade was 15k+ vs Reading and Millwall.

For comparison, Everton dropped to around 13k when they wanted Kendall out, Arsenal got 13k for one game in about 1983 when they were something like 3rd in the league, Spurs dropped below 10k at the back end of the 85-86 season, Chelsea dropped below 10k at various points (as they did in the 90's too), and I think Newcastle flirted with going below 5 figures as well. So 3 of the so-called Big Five at the time recorded lower league crowds than City during the 80's, despite being top-flight ever-presents throughout the decade whereas we went through 2 relegations.

Just going back to that utd wimbledon game...i ve read a few times that it looked as thp there were under 18k there...season tics were automatically counted...not ununsual of course...but the 18k estimates were from utd fans who were there.
 
Fuckers are third in my hatred list behind rags & dippers.....still not got over that fucking 81 cup final and the walk back to the train.

West Ham are a proper club just sadly without decent people in charge.
Your top three mirrors mine, different order maybe. Y words always say their not bothered by us and their a different league than us but match threads on the fighting cock would say otherwise

Oh, agreed on West Ham’s owners. Tits McGee and the dildos can fuck right off. We moan about foreign ownership of prem clubs but if this is the best of British, bring on the Saudis/Chinese/seppos
 
Just going back to that utd wimbledon game...i ve read a few times that it looked as thp there were under 18k there...season tics were automatically counted...not ununsual of course...but the 18k estimates were from utd fans who were there.

United for a long time were the only club to indicate season-ticket holders in attendance figures whether or not the fans in question actually turned up. Being the best-supported club was a big point of honour with their board, and they favoured publicising the biggest possible gate - i.e. the number that had actually paid to attend the game rather than the number that actually did so. That's commonplace now, but at every other club in those days, any discrepancy was inevitably in the direction of under-declaring the true gate. A lot of fans I've spoken to from various teams have claimed their boards did similar in the seventies and eighties, but Swales was a particularly egregious exponent of the policy.

Newspaper reports at the time also claimed that the United gate for that game against Wimbledon was well below the 23K that was announced. IIRC, some estimates went as low as 15K, a figure I remember because that was (and still is) as low as we've ever had during my lifetime for a league match. Don't suppose anyone will ever know the truth for sure.
 
Fuckers are third in my hatred list behind rags & dippers.....still not got over that fucking 81 cup final and the walk back to the train.

West Ham are a proper club just sadly without decent people in charge.
They don’t even register for me.

FC United, Stockport, Leeds, Millwall, Arsenal, Newcastle all rank above Spurs for hated clubs behind United and Liverpool
 
That was from the boxing, wasn't it?
It'll look better for the NFL.
As for 29th, anybody's guess.

I think those squares were from the Joshua fight the week before, believe the NFL matches are over the next 3 weekends. By the time of our match is will be be like playing on Hough End

I forgot about the boxing, but even so. A bit of rain on Sunday the 21st and the Sunday 28th and the pitch will be a ploughed field.
 
Wembley is not in the sticks. Arguably easier to access/exit from than N17 which is a fucking mare if anyone’s been. 43k doesn’t sound bad but this is ‘top six spurs’ we’re talking about. 43k is a disgrace for such a ‘big’ club. Even lowly West Ham in their rented shit bowl eclipse that by miles.

Faiweather fucktards

I agree - other than hte real Spurs locals, Wembley is pretty straightforward to get to (and much better for Cardiff fans, presumably).

60k in N17 is certainly going to be awkward to manage. I can see a lot of games starting late.
 
Just asking, is anyone going to use the free coach travel put on by the club for spurs away?

Or are you all making your own way there via car/ supporters club coaches etc?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.