I've said that it's not absolutely certain that the game won't be played on 28th October at new WHL.
That's not the same as saying that the game absolutely will be played on 28th October at new WHL. You can see the difference, right?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spurs’ new stadium
- Thread starter Chris Holmes
- Start date
I've said that it's not absolutely certain that the game won't be played on 28th October at new WHL.
That's not the same as saying that the game absolutely will be played on 28th October at new WHL. You can see the difference, right?
St.Pauli support
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 5,127
I've said that it's not absolutely certain that the game won't be played on 28th October at new WHL.
That's not the same as saying that the game absolutely will be played on 28th October at new WHL. You can see the difference, right?
Err yes.
But: you can 100% forget about the idea of a match without spectators.
That's nonsense for many reasons.
All your effort only try to make a poor story sound fancy. Not sure why though.
The first thing spurs should do is apologize NOW already for the inconvenience caused to all fans, esp. away fans, who have no fuckin idea how to organize their trip to whatever ground spurs should have in place and ready for playing PL, but haven't.
Yes, and ten times more Spurs fans would miss a game too. But they'd all miss the game in the event that it had to be forfeited too.
You do understand that this is down to your club, no way should city be inconvenienced by fixture congestion or having to play on an unsuitable playing surface. The spurs fans are for your club to sort out, but no way should our fans have to miss a game or lose out on hotel and travel cost because your club cocked up. It never really did seem the greatest idea to have a new ground opening so close to the start of the season, would it have not been better to have a completion date of the end of this season allowing the close season for any unforseen circumstances.
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/Carabao3
This does not look like Spurs are in control of matters - asking fans where matches should be played.
This does not look like Spurs are in control of matters - asking fans where matches should be played.
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/Carabao3
This does not look like Spurs are in control of matters - asking fans where matches should be played.
This is a survey by the supporters trust, not the club.
It relates to a game during the week of 24th September - a full month before the scheduled date for the Man City game.
So we shouldn't read too much into it, IMO.
Err yes.
But: you can 100% forget about the idea of a match without spectators.
That's nonsense for many reasons.
All your effort only try to make a poor story sound fancy. Not sure why though.
The first thing spurs should do is apologize NOW already for the inconvenience caused to all fans, esp. away fans, who have no fuckin idea how to organize their trip to whatever ground spurs should have in place and ready for playing PL, but haven't.
There have been plenty of games played before empty stadiums, for a variety of reasons.
I'm not trying to make anything sound "fancy". I'd like to think that I'm only helping you guys to sort the wheat from the chaff in terms of the sensationalist misinformation that is rife surrounding this issue.
You do understand that this is down to your club, no way should city be inconvenienced by fixture congestion or having to play on an unsuitable playing surface. The spurs fans are for your club to sort out, but no way should our fans have to miss a game or lose out on hotel and travel cost because your club cocked up. It never really did seem the greatest idea to have a new ground opening so close to the start of the season, would it have not been better to have a completion date of the end of this season allowing the close season for any unforseen circumstances.
No getting away from the fact that this is a far from ideal situation and that we could all be inconvenienced in some way. The club has apologised. And I'm sure that they will again. In the meanwhile, they're best off to say nothing until they have a better idea of what the outcome will be.
frasermcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 587
There have been plenty of games played before empty stadiums, for a variety of reasons.
I'm not trying to make anything sound "fancy". I'd like to think that I'm only helping you guys to sort the wheat from the chaff in terms of the sensationalist misinformation that is rife surrounding this issue.
This is now a 65 page thread, containing absolutely ZERO FACTS.
St.Pauli support
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 5,127
There have been plenty of games played before empty stadiums, for a variety of reasons.
I'm not trying to make anything sound "fancy". I'd like to think that I'm only helping you guys to sort the wheat from the chaff in terms of the sensationalist misinformation that is rife surrounding this issue.
What PL matches without spectators do you mean? Couldn't find any on a quick view.
Btw, I'm reading on spurs forums as well to make my own view.
I am also able to ask myself about the reliability of a source.
I just would like to decide myself what seems to be plausible and what doesn't.
What you are offering to us, no offence, seems to be a censored version of an indeed complex story. IMO.
johnnytapia
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 10,578
In the interest of clarity, and to avoid any confusion, it wasn't me (I am classless).I was seeing a deputy headteacher a couple of years back, so I can confirm there is such a thing as class action in the UK.