It's the same company that did the tannoy system in the lower tier at our place, I heard.
No one else heard the tannoy system .;-)
It's the same company that did the tannoy system in the lower tier at our place, I heard.
I know i'm going slightly off at a tangent here, but how the fuck does a half competent spark wire a fire alarm system, which is basically a number of 2 core loops, wrong to such an extent that the whole lot needs stripping out and starting again?
3 away games over Christmas? Give over.Switch the Spuds and Palace games round, is the obvious answer. We would then play Spuds at home on the 28th October, Palace away on the 22nd December, Spuds away on the 20th April, Palace at home on the 13th April.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport...ncerns-premier-league-spurs-a8498096.html?ampIndependent:
Tottenham new stadium: Ground may not be ready until 2019 as safety concerns delay £1bn project
Tottenham’s new stadium may not be ready until 2019 as problems with the safety systems may delay the move by up to six months.
Google it and you’d find the full article!
steve123
I have worked there, out of over 300 'circuits' for fire alarms only 30 work. The agencies who are supplying the electricians are using people who dont understand english, aren't qualified and buy there tools from lidl at dinner time. the agencies are making a fortune and the job is suffering. As a result they have upped the money to £350 per shift (agencies making even more money) but still employing muppets. It's not the sparkies that are the problem, it's the unskilled labour masquerading as sparkies supplied by agencies. Someone should investigate how much the agencies have made out of this.
I’d missed the fact that we had Leicester away on Boxing Day. Looking more and more like it’ll just get called off and rearranged for later in the season which, if they are going to do that, should be done sooner rather than later.3 away games over Christmas? Give over.
The only time it can be guaranteed to be played is the week after we play them at home in April - and we probably need that week to play Utd away due to City/Utd participation in the FA Cup QF. Playing Spurs tgat week really is a non starter as far as City are concerned as we need it to play other postponements.I’d missed the fact that we had Leicester away on Boxing Day. Looking more and more like it’ll just get called off and rearranged for later in the season which, if they are going to do that, should be done sooner rather than later.
I’d missed the fact that we had Leicester away on Boxing Day. Looking more and more like it’ll just get called off and rearranged for later in the season which, if they are going to do that, should be done sooner rather than later.
If forgotten about that.The example you picked doesn't really work, but there's a precedent for them changing the fixture list after it was announced. It involves City, too.
The 2007/8 season was due to end on Sunday, 11 May. We were picked by UEFA to host the final of the UEFA Cup on 14 May, which meant we needed to finish with an away game because UEFA demand that the stadium hosting the final be handed over to them for preparations a week in advance. Owing to some fuck-up somewhere along the line, we were given a home game against Newcastle on 11 May.
They switched our home and away fixtures against Boro so we played the home game that should have taken place in May on the day of the scheduled trip to Teesside in October (giving us three successive home league games in September and October that season). And we ended the season with two away trips - the traditional defeat at Anfield followed by the game at Boro where we shipped eight.
Dunno whether it's possible to do something more wide-reaching this time so we and Spurs face different opponents on 28 October and Spurs v City thus takes place on a different weekend. However, it's surely worth exploring when the alternatives involve either making us play 4 of our last 5 games at home (were they to switch this fixture to the Etihad) or causing potential fixture chaos in the run-in should we and/or Spurs go well in the domestic cups and Europe.
But clearly the best and fairest solution is that Spurs have a home game and therefore it should be played on the scheduled date as a Spurs home game. If their first-choice stadium is still under construction and the owner of their second has a contractual commitment allowing someone else to use the venue that day, Spurs should supply an alternative ground.
They clearly don't want to - Pochettino has made that very clear. But it's the only solution that avoids damaging our prospects this season when we bear no fault for this whatsoever, avoids dragging in other teams, and avoids a risk of fucking up the fixture list in general towards the end of the season.
They could end up in a bit of trouble with the PL over this. Condition K.4 states: “No Club shall have or enter into a ground-sharing agreement unless the agreement contains a legally enforceable provision to the effect that the playing of the Club's League Matches shall always take precedence over the activities of the other party to the agreement". The fact that they’ve not got Wembley for the season and have thus not enforced this condition, leaves them wide open. Mind you, after yesterday, docking points from other teams might be the only way to get the rags into the top 4!The example you picked doesn't really work, but there's a precedent for them changing the fixture list after it was announced. It involves City, too.
The 2007/8 season was due to end on Sunday, 11 May. We were picked by UEFA to host the final of the UEFA Cup on 14 May, which meant we needed to finish with an away game because UEFA demand that the stadium hosting the final be handed over to them for preparations a week in advance. Owing to some fuck-up somewhere along the line, we were given a home game against Newcastle on 11 May.
They switched our home and away fixtures against Boro so we played the home game that should have taken place in May on the day of the scheduled trip to Teesside in October (giving us three successive home league games in September and October that season). And we ended the season with two away trips - the traditional defeat at Anfield followed by the game at Boro where we shipped eight.
Dunno whether it's possible to do something more wide-reaching this time so we and Spurs face different opponents on 28 October and Spurs v City thus takes place on a different weekend. However, it's surely worth exploring when the alternatives involve either making us play 4 of our last 5 games at home (were they to switch this fixture to the Etihad) or causing potential fixture chaos in the run-in should we and/or Spurs go well in the domestic cups and Europe.
But clearly the best and fairest solution is that Spurs have a home game and therefore it should be played on the scheduled date as a Spurs home game. If their first-choice stadium is still under construction and the owner of their second has a contractual commitment allowing someone else to use the venue that day, Spurs should supply an alternative ground.
They clearly don't want to - Pochettino has made that very clear. But it's the only solution that avoids damaging our prospects this season when we bear no fault for this whatsoever, avoids dragging in other teams, and avoids a risk of fucking up the fixture list in general towards the end of the season.
The only problem I see is that Harry Kane would claim a hat-trick!Question remains what happens to our game? These new articles coming out only confirms further delays are inevitable so they better decide quickly so we know what’s happening for our game ... we don’t want a forfeited 3-0 result as that could damage our goals tally and goal difference at the end of the season ;)
What is the actual critical safety system problem that was discovered?
I vote for the home game for them at Arsenal’s Emirates stadium!
What is the actual critical safety system problem that was discovered?
I vote for the home game for them at Arsenal’s Emirates stadium!