Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
Schrödinger's cat emotions now - we won but also drew (emotionally). Just get used to it.
Correct, VAR should have had no impact on the result as we had enough chances to win 3 games yesterday, some very poor finishing, and poor decision making from our forward players I'm afraid. As good as we played we also gave away two quite poor goals as well.The game should of been put to bed long before var had a chance to do us over. I’m sure Pep will be thinking the same this morning
exactly -so there is room for human error or if you want to look at it from a really negative point of view, room for corruption.
However we have to believe (or we may as well not bother with the game) that that wont happen. If we belive its corrupt, why bother? Do i believe it is corrupt; no....do i belive refs (with or without VAR will make mistakes - yes...but more importantly do i believe different refs iwll interprit the same incident differently - yes....30 years ago noone would have been arguing about that being a foul by Lamela on Rodri - it was part of the game just as the inicident where Ottomendi went up for a high ball with their keeper, eyes firmly on the ball not even looking at the keeper and they have collided and the ref deems that a foul by Ottomendi - do i think thats foul no,,did the ref, yes...does that rule need looking at - yes but even then it will all come down to intepritation
In that case, why bother with VAR at all. Leave it to the referee. The point is that the referee acts in full view. He can fuck us over once or twice and that's what we expect. VAR opens up an opportunity for someone we xan't see or hear and who doesn't have to explain themselves to fuck us over on something neither the ref nor the players are aware of.
You may not believe it's corrupt, but, if you're right, it's the only multi-billion pound industry in history that isn't.
i agree with you......maybe VAR isnt the way but we have to acknowledge that people like Pep who know so much more than us are huge backers of it.....
If they had a shot of it hitting his arm, don't you think we'd have been shown it?I've yet to see decent and conclusive proof. The angle that was initially shown, seemed to look like Laporte's arm was hit, but you'd have think (especially after the Llorente debacle) they'd use all available angles