Not only that. Everybody knew as soon as the two finalists were known that there was a decent chance of this going to penalties. There will have been some discussion between Southgate and the players individually about how they felt about it, in advance. I'd be utterly astonished if there wasn't. Because that's how management works. And Raz may well have said — not out of any fear of his own ego being bruised, but
with the best interests of the team at heart — no, there are others here who are better at it than me, their track record proves it, if it comes to penalties, they should be the ones. This is not a question of having balls, or having heart. It's a question of being responsible to the greater interests of the collective. If the list in
@domalino post #295 above is to be trusted, Rashford has a very good record on penalties, and Sancho, while not having taken many, is 100%. Both in any case better than Raheem's. Raheem does many good things on the pitch. Apart from anything else, he is a superb diver (nota bene: JJ) Penalties isn't one of them.
Saka, though, is a strange choice, assuming it was taken in advance. And if he said yes, well, that's youth rushing in. Southgate shouldn't really have envisaged it. Has to be said, though, the main damage had been done at that point.
Haven't paid any attention to the media, incidentally. It'd wind me up too much. Are there really papers and pundits blaming Grealish and Sterling? Did that fucker Keane really put blame on both of them? I wish he'd just fuck right off. Preferably to Wormwood Scrubs, for a good long stretch — for criminal assault.