SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Reading through the Guardian article it seems that most of the negative stuff in the other papers has been written by non sports writers.
The writer claims most of the real sports writers would never descend to that level.
I wonder whether pundits on the TV would receive such accolades from their peers.
However, is he saying that the level that the non sports writers write at is capable of this depravity all the time and should be treated as such when reading about any subject rather than sport ?
I think this has just confirmed my suspicion that newspapers and the truth should never be considered to be related to each other whatever the subject matter.
The writer claims most of the real sports writers would never descend to that level.
I wonder whether pundits on the TV would receive such accolades from their peers.
However, is he saying that the level that the non sports writers write at is capable of this depravity all the time and should be treated as such when reading about any subject rather than sport ?
I think this has just confirmed my suspicion that newspapers and the truth should never be considered to be related to each other whatever the subject matter.