I'm a Pellegrini fan, it looks like he's losing the battle. But to put the blame all on his shoulders is idiotic.
He picked a side that a good percentage of our fans would have. It would have been nice to see Iheanacho over Bony and personally I'd have gone with Delph over Fernando, but those are changes that should make such a difference.
I was at WBA away, despite a terrific performance, ALL the fans were saying can't wait for Sterling, Silva and De Bruyne to play. From WBA away we've swapped Ya Ya for Fernando and Kompany & Mangala for Argentina's back two. Pellegrini isn't fucking around with formations, he's playing the 4231 that the majority of fans have been screaming for for 18 months.
I'm happy for Pellegrini to be replaced, certainly happy to be bettered, and yes I like him, but I've always said I'd be happier with Pep even though I think Pep's weaknesses are similar to Pellegrini.
We now as a club, as a fan base are stuck with Manuel, we are desperate for Pep, I believe it's undermining the manager and giving the players excuses.
There are slight changes that could have been made today, I'd have gone with Delph and possibly Iheanacho, should that really make that much of a difference? Not for me.
We played in a hurricane, Stoke played on a windy day. The difference for me, the players attitudes. You could blame Pellegrini for that, but City have taken away his foundations, it's hard to be strong when the players know you're off.