Stoke Vs City (FA Cup) Pre match Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tevez City said:
LoveCity said:
Tevez City said:
_______________Panti______________

Rekik_____Lescott___Boyata____Kolarov

__________Rodwell___Garcia___________

Lopes___________Nasri_______Mario

______________Dzeko____________

Do you want us to go out of the FA Cup? Boyata against Stoke after flopping in Holland? Rekik at right-back where he's never played? Stoke's long balls and thugball would kill that defence.



Because I prefer to keep the player fresh and ready for the QPR game, and IMO this team is good enough to beat Stoke.


And I agree with you regarding Rekik and Boyata, but who else can take their places apart from those who are starting EVERY WEEK?

Players we have are good enough to play twice in 4 days. No need for change.
 
Tevez City said:
LoveCity said:
Tevez City said:
_______________Panti______________

Rekik_____Lescott___Boyata____Kolarov

__________Rodwell___Garcia___________

Lopes___________Nasri_______Mario

______________Dzeko____________

Do you want us to go out of the FA Cup? Boyata against Stoke after flopping in Holland? Rekik at right-back where he's never played? Stoke's long balls and thugball would kill that defence.

Because I prefer to keep the player fresh and ready for the QPR game, and IMO this team is good enough to beat Stoke.


And I agree with you regarding Rekik and Boyata, but who else can take their places apart from those who are starting EVERY WEEK?
these guys are pros. no reason why they can't place once a week. There will be several days between that game and QPR also. that is a really bad team.
 
Tevez City said:
LoveCity said:
Tevez City said:
_______________Panti______________

Rekik_____Lescott___Boyata____Kolarov

__________Rodwell___Garcia___________

Lopes___________Nasri_______Mario

______________Dzeko____________

Do you want us to go out of the FA Cup? Boyata against Stoke after flopping in Holland? Rekik at right-back where he's never played? Stoke's long balls and thugball would kill that defence.

Because I prefer to keep the player fresh and ready for the QPR game, and IMO this team is good enough to beat Stoke.

Our strongest teams have failed to win at Stoke in FIVE attempts under Mancini. Are you familiar with the Stoke away fixture and how hard it is, Chelsea are the only top team this season and last to win there if I'm not mistaken. That team you listed would let in at least two goals. Boyata has no composure and his confidence will be at an all-time low, Jones and Walters would feast on him and prey on Rekik's inexperience... especially as you have him completely out of position.

And I agree with you regarding Rekik and Boyata, but who else can take their places apart from those who are starting EVERY WEEK?

We're an early kickoff on Saturday and don't play QPR until Tuesday night. 12:45 on Saturday then 19:45 on Tuesday gives them plenty of rest. Even so there may be changes but not to the extent we're asking to lose like the above. Boyata will probably never play for City's first team again, he's blown his two loan moves.

Fixture congestion is hardly an issue this season because we bombed out of Europe and the League Cup, they can handle two games in a few days because they've been having 7 days off most weeks.
 
I thought players need 3-4 days to fully recover for the next game, thats why I want a fully fit fresh team to face QPR.


And regarding the Stoke away form, I think City always played better and Stoke like Sunderland sit back and defended with 10 players for the whole game and were lucky to take points from City by relying on set pieces or refs mistakes.

IF City used a weaker team, Stoke will not sit back and it will be open game, which will make the game easier for City.
 
I would play Balotelli with Kun upfront and swap Kolarov for Clichy. Still it will be a strong side, Balo usually does well against them and Kolarov could deliver some crosses for him. I would be still happier to play Clichy in the league as a draw in the FA Cup now should do it but not in league games.

Maybe just maybe Nasri in for Silva...
 
Tevez City said:
_______________Panti______________

Rekik_____Lescott___Boyata____Kolarov

__________Rodwell___Garcia___________

Lopes___________Nasri_______Mario

______________Dzeko____________

My mind is boggling reading that team.

Awful team selection, even allowing for the fact you're obviously not bothered about winning the cup.
 
hart/panti
zab kompany lescott kolarov

rodwell barry

sinclair nasri mario

edin


bring in nastasic clichy garcia silva aguero tevez milner vs qpr
 
Tevez City said:
I thought players need 3-4 days to fully recover for the next game, thats why I want a fully fit fresh team to face QPR.


And regarding the Stoke away form, I think City always played better and Stoke like Sunderland sit back and defended with 10 players for the whole game and were lucky to take points from City by relying on set pieces or refs mistakes.

IF City used a weaker team, Stoke will not sit back and it will be open game, which will make the game easier for City.

So playing with a shit starting 11 makes us more likely to win? This is possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.