stuart brenna - lying rag

[Hamann Pineapple]

Stuart, appreciate you wanting to stand your ground but not sure whether it's a wise idea for you to track and address comments about yourself on this site...you may be laying yourself open to no end of flak. With all due respect, would it not be wiser (and, dare I say it, more professional?) to keep your counsel and your distance?

Where's the fun in that. Boooooo.

 

[Tbilisi]

My brother lived in a shared house with Brennan over a few years so I do know what I am talking about.He is a Red but there are good ones in my book,he is one.

On here 10 minutes and daring to post, sad day if I had to watch and learn from you.

 

[Cheltblue]

The guys ok,give him a break.

PS new poster but not a Red!Blue for 48 years!

No,he isn't "ok" at all.
He is,by his own admission,a lifelong rag.
My post above makes a reasonable query regarding his journalistic integrity.
You have been on here all of 10 minutes.
Maybe it would be advisable to watch and learn before posting about someone you clearly know nothing about.

How does being 'on here all of 10 minutes' mean that you have a less valid opinion of an individual (who has also been on here 'all of 10 minutes') than those that have been on here longer?

 

[Sky Blue]

Just a couple of things:
1. It says "reported interest" which is true - it has been reported.
2. I didn't actually write that - it was edited into my piece afterwards, quite fairly in my opinion, although I DIDN'T write it.
You need to get facts straight before you start calling someone a liar

Will you have a word with your sports editor Pete Spencer and tell him to stop talking utter garbage on national radio stations about our club. Be grateful.

 

[nijinsky's fetlocks]

The guys ok,give him a break.

PS new poster but not a Red!Blue for 48 years!

No,he isn't "ok" at all.
He is,by his own admission,a lifelong rag.
My post above makes a reasonable query regarding his journalistic integrity.
You have been on here all of 10 minutes.
Maybe it would be advisable to watch and learn before posting about someone you clearly know nothing about.

How does being 'on here all of 10 minutes' mean that you have a less valid opinion of an individual (who has also been on here 'all of 10 minutes') than those that have been on here longer?

I didn't state that his opinion is less valid,did I?
You said that.
He stated that Brennan is "ok".
Well,call me odd if you like,but I think that being a lifelong red tends to taint anything he writes regarding his beloved manure's most deadly rivals.
Therefore,I do not think that employing a rag to report on matters City is a good idea.
He obvously does,hence Brennan is "ok".
I then asked a legitimate question regarding editorial control.
Personally,I doubt that the character masquerading as "Brennan" on here is actually him at all.
But when "3 post wonders" come on here telling me that the lifelong rag reporting on my team is "ok",then I question their opinion.
Are you OK with that?

 

[Tbilisi]

Wrong again,it is Brennan,I have mailed him today and he confirmed it is him.

Anyway,what does a 3 post wonder know.

 

[Cheltblue]

The guys ok,give him a break.

PS new poster but not a Red!Blue for 48 years!

No,he isn't "ok" at all.
He is,by his own admission,a lifelong rag.
My post above makes a reasonable query regarding his journalistic integrity.
You have been on here all of 10 minutes.
Maybe it would be advisable to watch and learn before posting about someone you clearly know nothing about.

How does being 'on here all of 10 minutes' mean that you have a less valid opinion of an individual (who has also been on here 'all of 10 minutes') than those that have been on here longer?

I didn't state that his opinion is less valid,did I?
You said that.
He stated that Brennan is "ok".
Well,call me odd if you like,but I think that being a lifelong red tends to taint anything he writes regarding his beloved manure's most deadly rivals.
Therefore,I do not think that employing a rag to report on matters City is a good idea.
He obvously does,hence Brennan is "ok".
I then asked a legitimate question regarding editorial control.
Personally,I doubt that the character masquerading as "Brennan" on here is actually him at all.
But when "3 post wonders" come on here telling me that the lifelong rag reporting on my team is "ok",then I question their opinion.
Are you OK with that?

Im absolutely fine with that as you are refering to the first 3 lines of your statemnt of which i dont really have an opinion on but certainly cant disagree with your sentiments of having a rag reporting on City.

But i deduced from your last two lines that you feel you have more relevance than Tbilisi (who is a fellow blue by the way), just because you have more than 'all of 10 minutes' membership time.

Are you OK with that?

 

[Always Ali]

Just a couple of things:
1. It says "reported interest" which is true - it has been reported.
2. I didn't actually write that - it was edited into my piece afterwards, quite fairly in my opinion, although I DIDN'T write it.
You need to get facts straight before you start calling someone a liar

i recall someone once 'reporting' that a Lancaster bomber was found on the moon..

Well played for coming on here and responding though.

It was a B17 Flying Fortress actually (sorry to be a pedant).

 

[skiddypants]

Wrong again,it is Brennan,I have mailed him today and he confirmed it is him.

Anyway,what does a 3 post wonder know.

I think he can stand up for himself, i would not be happy if you did this for me.

Let it lie!

It's a bit of a laugh and if your in the public eye, well you can expect it.

 

[Tbilisi]

Skiddypants,just having some wind up banter with the keyboard warrior on here.

Hey,up to 7 posts now.