Suella Braverman - sacked as Home Secretary (p394)

mr t said:
She’s nothing more than a bully - end of.

Who votes for these people?
Click to expand...

The organisation I work for has recently been assessed negatively by the government authority which oversees my area of work and found wanting. Why? Because for several years our managers/leaders have been too soft. Too soft with our stakeholders and too soft with my co-workers - possibly for fear of the word 'bullying', in this snowflake generation. As a result I now expect to lose my job within a few months & I anticipate the organisation I work for will close down in 2023 as remaining customers take their business elsewhere. I wish we'd had a stronger leader - a 'bully' even, because some of my colleagues have been taking the p***.

Perhaps Rishi Sunak has realised that to avoid the same fate for himself and his MPs in 2024 or Jan 2025 he needs to bring back a 'bully' and in view of what has happened to me and my life, I have to respect him for that. A multitude of the electorate want control of illegal immigration and I think this re-appointment is a smart move if Suella Braverman can actually do something about it, unlike her predecessor. I don't blame Priti Patel for that failure by-the-way, she was driven to the limit (and also accused of bullying) because the civil servants who have no affinity with ordinary people outside of the Westminister bubble continually blocked her plans. We even had the crazy situation of snowflake Navy captains refusing government instructions because they didn't agree with it. I don't recall voting for Navy captains on my ballot paper in 2019.

I bet people reading that will immediately come back at me with 'international maritime laws' etc. but I don't care about that as I was promised 'control of our borders' & not continual subjugation to international laws which prevent that.

I hope the same thing doesn't hamper Braverman/Sunak which did Patel/Johnson - many people think only Boris Johnsons return would get the Torys re-elected in 2024, but I don't agree - he was actually a quite hopeless PM and he didn't get Brexit done, that is just one of the many, many, lies. He didn't get control of our borders and the non-flight of the plane to Rwanda showed he didn't get control of our laws either. The money sent to France and Rwanda and wasted on this issue would also call into question 'control of our money' too! I notice that when Sunak spoke outside No. 10 earlier today he did mention getting control of our borders, and he better do so. I think most people asked about this issue (by pollsters) wont give their true views, for fear of coming across as racist, but it isn't about that its about public services: schools, hospitals, roads etc. and how we are set up for 65 million people & not 85 million and people and day-in, day-out are seeing that.

Finally can I say I realise 95% of people reading this wont agree with me, but it is free country (just-about) and I hope the bluemoon forum will respect my right to express my views.
 
Last edited:
El_george said:
The organisation I work for has recently been assessed negatively by the government authority which oversees my area of work and found wanting. Why? Because for several years our managers/leaders have been too soft. Too soft with our stakeholders and too soft with my co-workers - possibly for fear of the word 'bullying', in this snowflake generation. As a result I now expect to lose my job within a few months & I anticipate the organisation I work for will close down in 2023 as remaining customers take their business elsewhere. I wish we'd had a stronger leader - a 'bully' even, because some of my colleagues have been taking the p***.

Perhaps Rishi Sunak has realised that to avoid the same fate for himself and his MPs in 2024 or Jan 2025 he needs to bring back a 'bully' and in view of what has happened to me and my life, I have to respect him for that. A multitude of the electorate want control of illegal immigration and I think this re-appointment is a smart move if Suella Braverman can actually do something about it, unlike her predecessor. I don't blame Priti Patel for that failure by-the-way, she was driven to the limit (and also accused of bullying) because the civil servants who have no affinity with ordinary people outside of the Westminister bubble continually blocked her plans. We even had the crazy situation of snowflake Navy captains refusing government instructions because they didn't agree with it. I don't recall voting for Navy captains on my ballot paper in 2019.

I bet people reading that will immediately come back at me with 'international maritime laws' etc. but I don't care about that as I was promised 'control of our borders' & not continual subjugation to international laws which prevent that.

I hope the same thing doesn't hamper Braverman/Sunak which did Patel/Johnson - many people think only Boris Johnsons return would get the Torys re-elected in 2024, but I don't agree - he was actually a quite hopeless PM and he didn't get Brexit done, that is just one of the many, many, lies. He didn't get control of our borders and the non-flight of the plane to Rwanda showed he didn't get control of our laws either. The money sent to France and Rwanda and wasted these issues would also call into question 'control of our money' too! I notice that when Sunak spoke outside No. 10 earlier today he did mention getting control of our borders, and he better do so. I think most people asked about this issue (by pollsters) wont give their true views, for fear of coming across as racist, but it isn't about that its about public services: schools, hospitals, roads etc. and how we are set up for 65 million people & not 85 million and people and day-in, day-out are seeing that.
Click to expand...
Two things - immigration (from outside the EU) way outstrips the number crossing the channel in boats.

And you don't get the promise fulfilled of "control of borders" unless I get the promise fulfilled that "we'd still be in a free trade zone from Iceland to the Russian border".
 
Vic said:
Two things - legal immigration (from outside the EU) way outstrips the number crossing the channel in boats.

And you don't get the promise fulfilled of "control of borders" unless I get the promise fulfilled that "we'd still be in a free trade zone from Iceland to the Russian border".
Click to expand...
It’s literally pointless debating with him.
 
Vic said:
Two things - immigration (from outside the EU) way outstrips the number crossing the channel in boats.

And you don't get the promise fulfilled of "control of borders" unless I get the promise fulfilled that "we'd still be in a free trade zone from Iceland to the Russian border".
Click to expand...

Help please (I basically don't understand your point).

Yes I do know last year we issued 1.2 million visas or something, don't quite know why when 13% of the uk population who can work, don't work.

Plus, why are we stripping the Philippines of their Drs and nurses just because the median age of death is ten years greater in our country than theirs. People criticise the UK for slavery and stuff 200 years ago, but say nothing about this, now.
 
Last edited:
El_george said:
Help please (I basically don't understand your point).
Click to expand...
We have never not been in control of our borders.

Literally.

The solution you want could have been applied by any government since 1900. (This is an arbitrary date. It could have been 2000BC)

Who will you vote for when you finally realise that the “illegal” immigrants crossing the channel are a direct result of the Tories not allowing people to apply for asylum on foreign soil?

Your golden dream of zero immigrants ever will never happen as they are crucial to our economy.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.