No you're referring to Davinia Taylor not Joanna Taylornjmcfc1894 said:TGR said:mat said:
Well...
If Mr Murphy is snuggling up to that every night then - respect!
Isnt she the one a certain local love cheat belted in a nightclub?
No you're referring to Davinia Taylor not Joanna Taylornjmcfc1894 said:TGR said:mat said:
Well...
If Mr Murphy is snuggling up to that every night then - respect!
Isnt she the one a certain local love cheat belted in a nightclub?
I'm no cynic said:Any player on a weekly wage of £50k and up runs the risk of becoming complacent. The difference between VK and Danny boy though is that one has the ability to succeed at the highest level and an incentive to do so remains whereas the other has been paid far in excess of his ability and ran out of clubs willing him to pay what he alone felt he was worth.
I usually find Murphy to be Ok, but it was though they just wanted a negative slant on Vinnie's new deal yesterday. He said from his experience he finds players on a six year contract could become complacent. Well what evidence is there of this? Bale has a six- year deal, and there is no sign of him losing any interest. Keylor Navas has a new six-year contract but it is too early to judge this.Vienna_70 said:I'm no cynic said:Any player on a weekly wage of £50k and up runs the risk of becoming complacent. The difference between VK and Danny boy though is that one has the ability to succeed at the highest level and an incentive to do so remains whereas the other has been paid far in excess of his ability and ran out of clubs willing him to pay what he alone felt he was worth.
Let's face it; if Vinnie decides to ease off, he'll probably get a belt from his Mrs!
She won't want to see anything but the best for City.
strongbowholic said:It's lost its charm for me these days. It never used to be subtle or clever by any stretch of the imagination, but these days it just smacks of desperation - specious arguments etc. Got bored with it in truth.
Who knows, might pick up when the season restarts? Lamer than a duck with a broken leg at the moment.
Narrative for the season will simply be Van Turtle vs Maureen to the exclusion of everything else.
It is painful, but true. It'll take at least 6-7 more years of us winning trophies to get anywhere near them.Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
Even then it may never happen. The events of 1958 are written in club folklore and will never be laid to rest. I can understand this, but the transformation of a tragedy into a marketing tool I can't.malg said:It is painful, but true. It'll take at least 6-7 more years of us winning trophies to get anywhere near them.Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
I'm no cynic said:Even then it may never happen. The events of 1958 are written in club folklore and will never be laid to rest. I can understand this, but the transformation of a tragedy into a marketing tool I can't.malg said:It is painful, but true. It'll take at least 6-7 more years of us winning trophies to get anywhere near them.Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
Chortle.Ancient Citizen said:Tomato head has just been talking to another unintelligible Jock, Alex McLeeeeesh. It was like listening to two patients in the final stages of emphysema, McLeish was wheezing like a pair of broken bellows and a conversation involving 'Couldnee, disnee, hasnee and wilnee,' made understanding anything, akin to listening to the Proclaimers singing in Urdu.
I'm no cynic said:Even then it may never happen. The events of 1958 are written in club folklore and will never be laid to rest. I can understand this, but the transformation of a tragedy into a marketing tool I can't.malg said:It is painful, but true. It'll take at least 6-7 more years of us winning trophies to get anywhere near them.Bodicoteblue said:"The revival of utd will become the narrative of this season proving to City that they are not the big club they think they are. They are a social engineering project , renewing large parts of rundown Manchester , but they will find out that they do not have the emotional pull that utd have"
That's what they said!
The 49ers said:I'm no cynic said:Even then it may never happen. The events of 1958 are written in club folklore and will never be laid to rest. I can understand this, but the transformation of a tragedy into a marketing tool I can't.malg said:It is painful, but true. It'll take at least 6-7 more years of us winning trophies to get anywhere near them.
There is a certain other club that wears red that have almost perfected the art of turning a tragedy into a marketing tool.
Has to be bullshit, as we'd be paying north of £55m for him.Dirty Harry said:The French correspondent on there seems to think we've paid quite a bit over £40m for Mangala, on the basis we've paid Porto £32m for 57% of him, ergo we've had to pay another 47% on top of that to the third party, I'm sure it doesn't really work like that, but that's how it was reported.
I think he said we paid just over £24 million to Porto.malg said:Has to be bullshit, as we'd be paying north of £55m for him.Dirty Harry said:The French correspondent on there seems to think we've paid quite a bit over £40m for Mangala, on the basis we've paid Porto £32m for 57% of him, ergo we've had to pay another 47% on top of that to the third party, I'm sure it doesn't really work like that, but that's how it was reported.